This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Why can't we get 2?
Log in to reply
Because 3 n ≫ 2 n for large n so that 3 n + 2 n 3 n + 1 + 2 n + 1 ≈ 3 n 3 n + 1 = 3
If we examine the graph of a^x the slope of 3^x is greater than 2^x and 3^x>>2^x,therefore 2^x can be neglected and left will be 3^{n+1}/3^n. therefore answer is 3. another way,we can apply binomial expansion in (3-1)^{n+1} and (3-1)^n.and then it can be evaluated.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
L = n → ∞ lim 2 n + 3 n 2 n + 1 + 3 n + 1 = n → ∞ lim 3 n 2 n + 3 n 3 n 3 n 2 n + 1 + 3 n 3 n + 1 = 0 + 1 0 + 3 = 3 Dividing up and down by 3 n