Evaluate the limit!

Calculus Level 5

L = lim n 1 n + 2 n + 3 n + + n n n n L=\lim_{n\to \infty}\frac{1^n+2^n+3^n+\cdots+n^n}{n^n}

Evaluate the above limit and enter 100 L \lfloor 100L \rfloor .


The answer is 158.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Guilherme Niedu
Jul 17, 2020

L = lim n 1 n + 2 n + 3 n + . . . + n n n n \large \displaystyle L = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1^n + 2^n + 3^n + ... + n^n}{n^n}

L = lim n 1 n n n + 2 n n n + 3 n n n + . . . + 1 \large \displaystyle L = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1^n}{n^n} + \frac{2^n}{n^n} + \frac{3^n}{n^n} + ... + 1

Reversing the order of the summation, i.e., going from the last to the first term:

L = lim n 1 + ( n 1 n ) n + ( n 2 n ) n + ( n 3 n ) n + . . . \large \displaystyle L = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} 1 + \left( \frac{n-1}{n} \right )^n + \left( \frac{n-2}{n} \right )^n + \left( \frac{n-3}{n} \right )^n + ...

L = lim n 1 + ( 1 1 n ) n + ( 1 2 n ) n + ( 1 3 n ) n + . . . \large \displaystyle L = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} 1 + \left( 1 - \frac1n \right )^n + \left( 1 -\frac2n \right )^n + \left( 1 - \frac3n \right )^n + ...

Now, a well know fact that comes from the definition of e e is that:

lim n ( 1 + a n ) b n = e a b \large \displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \left (1 + \frac{a}{n} \right) ^{bn} = e^{ab}

So:

L = 1 + e 1 + e 2 + e 3 + . . . \large \displaystyle L = 1 + e^{-1} + e^{-2} + e^{-3} + ...

L = 1 1 e 1 1.582 \color{#20A900} \boxed{ \large \displaystyle L = \frac{1}{1-e^{-1}} \approx 1.582}

Thus:

L = 158 \color{#3D99F6} \boxed{ \large \displaystyle \lfloor L \rfloor = 158 }

Its doesn't show that the limit does exist. One need to show that limit does.

Naren Bhandari - 10 months, 4 weeks ago
Naren Bhandari
Jul 17, 2020

I will just work on upper bound( different way) for this problem and for more rigorous work here are details by Sir , Mark Henning .

Note that ( k n ) n = ( 1 + n k k ) n e ( n k ) \left(\frac{k}{n}\right)^n=\left(1+\frac{n-k}{k}\right)^{-n}\leq e^{-(n-k)} so k = 1 n ( k n ) n k = 1 n e k n = m = 1 n 1 e m \sum_{k=1}^n \left(\frac{k}{n}\right)^{n}\leq \sum_{k=1}^{n} e^{k-n}=\sum_{m=1}^{n-1} e^{-m} therefore the upper bound we seek is lim n sup k = 1 n ( k n ) n m 0 e m = e e 1 \lim_{n\to \infty} \operatorname{sup}\sum_{k=1}^n\left(\frac{k}{n}\right)^n\leq \sum_{ m\geq 0} e^{-m}=\frac{e}{e-1}


More information : This is just particular case of Wolstenholme limit for the real positive number m = 1 m=1 . That is lim n k = 1 n ( k n ) m n = e m e m 1 \lim_{n\to\infty}\sum_{k=1}^{n}\left(\frac{k}{n}\right)^{mn}=\frac{e^m}{e^m-1} set m = 1 m=1 we have our required result as e e 1 \frac{e}{e-1} .


The variant version was proposed by J. A Scott (UK) which was published by American mathematical monthly, Vol 126, November 2019 as lim n k = 1 n ( k n ) k \lim_{n\to\infty}\sum_{k=1}^{n}\left(\frac{k}{n}\right)^{k} the result is same that of Wolstenholme limit .


I manage to find(before I discover the fact about Wolstenholme limit) the approximation / inequality for J.A Scott (Uk), which I proposed and published by RMM , here

Show that lim n k = 1 n ( k n ) k < ln 3 ln 2 \lim_{n\to\infty} \sum_{k=1}^{n}\left(\frac{k}{n}\right)^k < \frac{\ln 3}{\ln 2}

@Guilherme Niedu proposed a beautiful solution. You are just making things complex.

Keshav Khandelwal - 10 months ago

Log in to reply

I have added the more info. That's solution assume the existence of limit which is not proven. So it has more work to be done.

Naren Bhandari - 10 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...