L = n → ∞ lim n n 1 n + 2 n + 3 n + ⋯ + n n
Evaluate the above limit and enter ⌊ 1 0 0 L ⌋ .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Its doesn't show that the limit does exist. One need to show that limit does.
I will just work on upper bound( different way) for this problem and for more rigorous work here are details by Sir , Mark Henning .
Note that ( n k ) n = ( 1 + k n − k ) − n ≤ e − ( n − k ) so k = 1 ∑ n ( n k ) n ≤ k = 1 ∑ n e k − n = m = 1 ∑ n − 1 e − m therefore the upper bound we seek is n → ∞ lim s u p k = 1 ∑ n ( n k ) n ≤ m ≥ 0 ∑ e − m = e − 1 e
More information : This is just particular case of Wolstenholme limit for the real positive number m = 1 . That is n → ∞ lim k = 1 ∑ n ( n k ) m n = e m − 1 e m set m = 1 we have our required result as e − 1 e .
The variant version was proposed by J. A Scott (UK) which was published by American mathematical monthly, Vol 126, November 2019 as n → ∞ lim k = 1 ∑ n ( n k ) k the result is same that of Wolstenholme limit .
I manage to find(before I discover the fact about Wolstenholme limit) the approximation / inequality for J.A Scott (Uk), which I proposed and published by RMM , here
Show that n → ∞ lim k = 1 ∑ n ( n k ) k < ln 2 ln 3
@Guilherme Niedu proposed a beautiful solution. You are just making things complex.
Log in to reply
I have added the more info. That's solution assume the existence of limit which is not proven. So it has more work to be done.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
L = n → ∞ lim n n 1 n + 2 n + 3 n + . . . + n n
L = n → ∞ lim n n 1 n + n n 2 n + n n 3 n + . . . + 1
Reversing the order of the summation, i.e., going from the last to the first term:
L = n → ∞ lim 1 + ( n n − 1 ) n + ( n n − 2 ) n + ( n n − 3 ) n + . . .
L = n → ∞ lim 1 + ( 1 − n 1 ) n + ( 1 − n 2 ) n + ( 1 − n 3 ) n + . . .
Now, a well know fact that comes from the definition of e is that:
n → ∞ lim ( 1 + n a ) b n = e a b
So:
L = 1 + e − 1 + e − 2 + e − 3 + . . .
L = 1 − e − 1 1 ≈ 1 . 5 8 2
Thus:
⌊ L ⌋ = 1 5 8