Given that f ( 3 2 x − 1 ) = 9 4 x 2 − 1 0 x − 5 ,
find f ( f ( 1 ) f ( 3 ) − f ( 2 ) ) .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
same as i did...... cheers Finn
Great one!
I also did it the same way...without finding the function....cheers!
That's how I did it. :)
Log in to reply
Same. :)
Yeah.
Thats the way I did it
Log in to reply
Cool!
I did the same way
If we could solve for f(x) then it would be easy for us to solve the problem.
Let f ( 3 2 x − 1 ) = a ( 3 2 x − 1 ) 2 + b ( 3 2 x − 1 ) + c . Then expanding it would yield:
f ( 3 2 x − 1 ) = a ( 9 4 x 2 − 4 x + 1 ) + b ( 9 6 x − 3 ) + 9 9 c
f ( 3 2 x − 1 ) = 9 4 a x 2 − 4 a x + a + 9 6 b x − 3 b + 9 9 c
f ( 3 2 x − 1 ) = 9 4 a x 2 − 4 a x + a + 6 b x − 3 b + 9 c
f ( 3 2 x − 1 ) = 9 ( 4 a x 2 ) + ( − 4 a x + 6 b x ) + ( a − 3 b + 9 c )
Do not be confused about the grouping of terms; I just grouped the quadratic term, the linear terms, and the constant terms. If we compare this with f ( 3 2 x − 1 ) = 9 4 x 2 − 1 0 x − 5 , we can see that 4 a x 2 = 4 x 2 , or a = 1 (by cancelling 4 x 2 ) ; − 4 a x + 6 b x = − 1 0 x , or − 4 a + 6 b = − 1 0 (by cancelling x ) ; and a − 3 b + 9 c = − 5 .
Now, we are left with the system
a = 1
− 4 a + 6 b = − 1 0
a − 3 b + 9 c = − 5
which, when solved, easily gives us a = 1 , b = − 1 , and c = − 1 . Substitute these values to f ( 3 2 x − 1 ) = a ( 3 2 x − 1 ) 2 + b ( 3 2 x − 1 ) + c and you will obtain:
f ( 3 2 x − 1 ) = ( 3 2 x − 1 ) 2 - ( 3 2 x − 1 ) - 1
Replace 3 2 x − 1 with x and you'll obtain: f ( x ) = x 2 − x − 1
Now, f ( f ( 1 ) f ( 3 ) − f ( 2 ) ) = f ( ( 1 2 − 1 − 1 ) ( 3 2 − 3 − 1 ) − ( 2 2 − 2 − 1 ) ) = f ( − 1 5 − 1 ) = f ( − 4 )
Finally, f ( − 4 ) = ( − 4 ) 2 − ( − 4 ) − 1 = 1 6 + 4 − 1 = 1 9
You made it complicated dude.....but great one..
We can let g ( x ) = 3 2 x − 1 and find for g − 1 ( x ) .
We can check that g − 1 ( x ) = 2 3 x + 1 .
Now we solve for f ( x ) by computing for f ( g ( 2 3 x + 1 ) ) .
Why does this work? It is because in reality, you are solving for f ( g ( g − 1 ( x ) ) ) = f ( x ) .
It is easy to verify that f ( x ) = x 2 − x − 1
Then f ( f ( 1 ) f ( 3 ) − f ( 2 ) ) = f ( 1 − 1 − 1 ( 9 − 3 − 1 ) − ( 4 − 2 − 1 ) ) = f ( − 1 4 ) = ( − 4 ) 2 − ( − 4 ) − 1 = 1 6 + 4 − 1 = 1 9
Replace x by (3x+1)/2 This will give f(x)
From f ( 3 2 x − 1 ) we need to find f ( x ) .
Let's find f ( k ) for some real number k .
So, what should we put in place of
x
to get
k
?
3
2
x
−
1
=
k
⟹
x
=
2
3
k
+
1
Thus, we obtain f ( k ) = 9 4 ( 2 3 k + 1 ) 2 − 1 0 ( 2 3 k + 1 ) − 5 ⟹ f ( k ) = k 2 − k − 1 ⟹ f ( x ) = x 2 − x − 1
So, we get f ( 1 ) = − 1 , f ( 2 ) = 1 , f ( 3 ) = 5 .
Putting this values according to the question, we find f ( − 1 5 − 1 ) = f ( − 4 ) = 1 9
By looking at given equation it can be concluded that f(x)=x^2-x-1. Then it becomes very simple. f(3)=5;f(2)=1;f(1)=-1.required answer is 19
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
I have a very creative solution to this problem that requires much less bashing. Let's examine the second equation (the one we have to solve). Let's first find f ( 3 ) . If we want f ( 3 2 x − 1 ) = f ( 3 ) , then 3 = 3 2 x − 1 ⟹ x = 5 . Plugging this into the equation, we see that f ( 3 ) = 5 (it's just a coincidence that plugging five into the equation produces five). Doing likewise for the other two functions ( f ( 2 ) and f ( 1 ) ) turns the final expression into f ( − 1 5 − 1 ) ⟹ f ( − 4 ) . We know how to tackle this, and doing so produces 1 9 as the desired answer. Notice that we never even solved for the function! Great problem! :D