Factor A Degree 100 Polynomial

Algebra Level 4

Can the polynomial ( x 1 ) ( x 2 ) ( x 3 ) ( x 100 ) 1 (x-1)(x-2)(x-3) \cdots (x-100) - 1 be factorized into 2 non-constant polynomials with integer coefficients?

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Mark Hennings
Nov 17, 2016

If this factorization were possible, we could find A ( x ) , B ( x ) Z [ x ] A(x),B(x) \in \mathbb{Z}[x] , both with degrees less than 100 100 , such that A ( x ) B ( x ) j = 1 100 ( x j ) 1 A(x)B(x) \; \equiv\; \prod_{j=1}^{100}(x-j) - 1 and hence A ( j ) B ( j ) = 1 1 j 100 A(j)B(j) \; = \; -1 \hspace{2cm} 1 \le j \le 100 Thus we can find ϵ j { 1 , 1 } \epsilon_j \in \{-1,1\} for 1 j 100 1 \le j \le 100 such that A ( j ) = ϵ j B ( j ) = ϵ j 1 j 100 A(j) \; = \; \epsilon_j \hspace{1cm} B(j) \; = \; -\epsilon_j \hspace{2cm} 1 \le j \le 100 so that A ( j ) + B ( j ) = 0 A(j) + B(j) = 0 for 1 j 100 1 \le j \le 100 . Thus A ( x ) + B ( x ) A(x) + B(x) is a polynomial of degree at most 99 99 with at least 100 100 distinct zeros, and hence is identically zero. Thus B ( x ) A ( x ) B(x) \equiv - A(x) , and so A ( x ) 2 j = 1 100 ( x j ) 1 -A(x)^2 \; \equiv\; \prod_{j=1}^{100}(x-j) - 1 Putting x = 101 x=101 , this would imply that 100 ! 1 = A ( 101 ) 2 100! - 1 = -A(101)^2 was negative, which is nonsense. Thus no such factorization exists.

Oh, that's a nice alternative trick!

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 7 months ago

Byvyt yv is

Paul Morrissey - 4 years, 6 months ago
Kushal Bose
Nov 15, 2016

( x 1 ) ( x 2 ) ( x 3 ) ( x 100 ) 1 = p ( x ) q ( x ) (x-1)(x-2)(x-3) \cdots (x-100)-1=p(x)q(x) where p(x) and q(x) are 2 non-constant polynomials with integer coefficients.

p ( 1 ) q ( 1 ) = 1 p(1)q(1)=-1 So, either p ( 1 ) = 1 , q ( 1 ) = 1 or p ( 1 ) = 1 , q ( 1 ) = 1 p(1)=1,q(1)=-1 \, \text{or}\, p(1)=-1,q(1)=1

p ( 2 ) q ( 2 ) = 1 p(2)q(2)=-1 .So,either p ( 2 ) = 1 , q ( 2 ) = 1 or p ( 2 ) = 1 , q ( 2 ) = 1 p(2)=1,q(2)=-1 \, \text{or}\, p(2)=-1,q(2)=1

Now it continues...

p ( 100 ) q ( 100 ) = 1 p(100)q(100)=-1 .So,either p ( 100 ) = 1 , q ( 100 ) = 1 or p ( 100 ) = 1 , q ( 100 ) = 1 p(100)=1,q(100)=-1 \, \text{or}\, p(100)=-1,q(100)=1 .

Each p(i) or q(i) will be ± 1 \pm1 where 1 i 100 1 \leq i \leq 100 ..

We know for a polynomial p ( x ) p(x) we know ( i j ) p ( i ) p ( j ) (i-j) |p(i)-p(j) where i , j i,j are integers.Now we can find i , j i,j with i j > 2 , p ( i ) = 1 , p ( j ) = 1 i-j >2,p(i)=1,p(j)=-1 ,This will become i j > 2 i-j>2 does not divide p ( i ) p ( j ) = 2 p(i)-p(j)=2 .it will not satisfy above condition because p(x) is an polynomial with integer coefficients.So, there is no p ( x ) p(x) exists.This logic is also valid for q ( x ) q(x) .

Again if every p ( i ) = 1 p(i)=1 ,then we can write the p ( x ) = ( x 1 ) ( x 2 ) . . . . ( x 100 ) + 1 = ( x 1 ) ( x 2 ) . . . . ( x 100 ) 1 + 2 = p ( x ) q ( x ) + 1 p(x)=(x-1)(x-2)....(x-100)+1 \\ =(x-1)(x-2)....(x-100)-1+2=p(x)q(x)+1

That's not possible .So, there must be at least one p ( i ) = 1 p(i)=-1 .hence we can find i , j i,j for above logic.Same logic for q(x) also.

Again if every p ( i ) = 1 p(i)=-1 ,then we can write the p ( x ) = ( x 1 ) ( x 2 ) . . . . ( x 100 ) 1 = p ( x ) q ( x ) p(x)=(x-1)(x-2)....(x-100) -1=p(x)q(x)

That's not possible because q ( x ) q(x) will become constant polynomial. .So, there must be at least one p ( i ) = 1 p(i)=1 .hence we can find i , j i,j for above logic.Same logic for q(x) also.

That's why factorization is not possible.

Good approach :)

There is a slight gap towards the end. After finding p ( i ) = 1 p (i ) = 1 , why must there be a j j such that p ( j ) = 1 p(j) = -1 ? Do you see how to plug that gap?

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

I have updated m y solution.Plzz check.

Kushal Bose - 4 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

That's the idea, but it's not completely correct. Note that all we have is

p ( x ) = A ( x ) × ( x i ) + 1 p(x) = A(x) \times \prod( x - i ) + 1

for some (possibly constant) polynomial.

A cleaner argument is to start off with deg p < 100 \deg p < 100 from the non-trivial factorization, and then show that in this case deg p 100 \deg p \geq 100 .

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 7 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...