We are considering polynomials of the form ( x − 1 ) ( x − 2 ) ( x − 3 ) ⋯ ( x − p + 1 ) + 1 − p 2 that can be factorized into 2 non-constant polynomials with integer coefficients.
What is the number of those polynomials if p is prime and less than 1 0 8 ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Many theorems has been used for the proof:
Eisenstein's Irreducibility Criterion
This is a marvelous problem and solution!
I'm amazed how far that one problem has inspired you. Would love to see more :)
Log in to reply
This is no limit to inspiration.
The only constraints I can see are:
to not become too complex
and
to have the answer to the problem
Short and sweet.
I wonder if there is a simple way to check the reducibility of f 1 3 and f 5 6 3 .
Log in to reply
On computer checking with Mathematica, it seems that both f 1 3 and f 5 6 3 are irreducible. I have yet to find a good reason why. It seems that f 1 3 is irreducible modulo 1 1 ; if that were easyish to prove, that would confirm the irreducibility of f 1 3 . There is no prime p less than 5 6 3 for which f 5 6 3 becomes irreducible modulo p , so the modulus-reduction technique will not help in this case.
It seems, however, that p = 5 is the only case where f p is reducible for p < 5 × 1 0 8 .
Log in to reply
May be we should consider f p , k ( x ) = ( x − 1 ) ( x − 2 ) . . ( x − p + 1 ) + 1 + k p 2 for k in Z
The proof will be the same. only f 5 , k , f 1 3 , k , f 5 6 3 , k could be reducible.
If we take k = − p 2 ( p − 1 ) ! + 1 , it will be reducible.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
If p is prime, then a j ≡ 1 for all 1 ≤ a ≤ p − 1 , so that x p − 1 − 1 ≡ j = 1 ∏ p − 1 ( x − j ) in Z p [ x ] . Thus, if f p ( x ) = j = 1 ∏ p − 1 ( x − j ) + 1 − p 2 then f p ( x ) ≡ x p − 1 in Z p [ x ] . If p 2 fails to divide ( p − 1 ) ! + 1 , then p 2 does not divide the constant coefficient of f p ( x ) , and hence f p ( x ) is irreducible in Z [ x ] by Eisenstein's irreducibility criterion.
Thus the primes p for which Eisenstein's Criterion, using the prime p , fails to show that f p ( x ) is irreducible are the ones for which p 2 divides ( p − 1 ) ! + 1 . These primes are called Wilson primes . Only three Wilson primes are known up to 5 × 1 0 8 , these being 5 , 1 3 and 5 6 3 . Since f 5 ( x ) has no constant term, it certainly is reducible. I haven't checked the reducibility of f 1 3 ( x ) and f 5 6 3 ( x ) , but it is clear that the number of primes p between 1 and 1 0 8 for which f p ( x ) is reducible is at least 1 and no more than 3 , making between 1 and 9 the correct answer.