Factorial of Smallest Multiple Divisible by Square!

Find the smallest positive integer value of x x such that for every positive integer a a greater than 1, ( x a ) ! (xa)! is divisible by a 2 a^2 .

If there is no such positive integer value x x , then enter 0.


The answer is 2.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

The answer is 2 .

First , let's see that it works. For any positive integer a a , we have ( 2 a ) ! (2a)! = 1 × 2 × 3 × × a × × ( 2 a 1 ) × ( 2 a ) 1\times2\times3\times\ldots \ldots \ldots \times a \times \ldots \ldots \ldots \times (2a-1) \times (2a) , where the factors a a and 2 a 2a confirms the divisibility of ( 2 a ) ! (2a)! by a 2 a^2 .

Second , the only smaller candidate is 1 1 . Now showing " 1 1 doesn't work" will suffice. Just think of a prime value of a a .

Nice question!

A slightly more interesting version would be to allow x x to be a real number, which has a similar proof.

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 6 months ago
Kushal Bose
Nov 28, 2016

The problem can be generalised as ( x a ) ! (xa)! is divisible by a k a^k if x = k x=k

Can you add a proof of the generalization?

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

This generalization is instantly obvious from the fact that:

( n r ) ! n ! ( r ! ) k \frac{(nr)!}{n!(r!)^k} is an integer for n , r 1 n,r \geq 1 .

This fact can be proved by induction on n n .

By the way, k k isn't necessarily the minimum positive integer value of x x such that ( x a ) ! (xa)! is divisible by a k a^k .

Muhammad Rasel Parvej - 4 years, 6 months ago

Yes. But k isn't necessarily the minimum value of x so that ( x a ) ! (xa)! is divisible by a k a^k .

Muhammad Rasel Parvej - 4 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

If k is prime then ??

Kushal Bose - 4 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Nope. Not a matter of primality.

Muhammad Rasel Parvej - 4 years, 6 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...