Factorials And Divisors

1 ! 1! has 1 positive divisor.
2 ! 2! has 2 positive divisors.
3 ! 3! has 4 positive divisors.
4 ! 4! has 8 positive divisors.
5 ! 5! has 16 positive divisors.
6 ! 6! has ______ \text{\_\_\_\_\_\_} positive divisors.

Notation: ! ! is the factorial notation. For example, 8 ! = 1 × 2 × 3 × × 8 8! = 1\times2\times3\times\cdots\times8 .


The answer is 30.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Arjen Vreugdenhil
Oct 22, 2016

Relevant wiki: Number of Factors

From the wiki above,

If N = p 1 q 1 p 2 q 2 p n q n N = p_1 ^{q_1} p_2^{q_2} \ldots p_n ^ {q_n} , then N N has d ( N ) = ( q 1 + 1 ) ( q 2 + 1 ) ( q n + 1 ) d(N) = (q_1 +1) (q_2 +1) \cdots (q_n + 1) divisors.

With 6 ! = 720 = 2 4 3 2 5. 6! = 720 = 2^4\cdot3^2\cdot 5.

From this prime factorization we see immediately that there are ( 4 + 1 ) ( 2 + 1 ) ( 1 + 1 ) = 30 (4+1)(2+1)(1+1) = \boxed{30} positive divisors.

Very nice fake pattern. I was slightly surprised that 4! worked out!

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Essentially it is because 3 + 1 = ( 1 + 1 ) ( 1 + 1 ) 3+1 = (1+1)(1+1) .

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 4 years, 7 months ago

@Calvin Lin ,

Sir this question is very easy. You can see that. Then also it is marked with level 4.

One have to only find number of divisors of 720 which is a one line answer.

I posted one IMO question which was also rated level 4. This means that there is no difference between that IMO problem and this problem.

I don't think there is a deep reason behind this rating.

So, Please see and do the necessary changes.

Priyanshu Mishra - 4 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

This is a brand new problem and ratings take some time to stabilize. It does seem like it's stabilizing around mid-level 3.

We were aggressive in featuring this problem (leading to many more people trying it), because I wanted to highlight the misconception in pattern recognition.

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 7 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...