This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Note that 71, 73, and 79 are all prime numbers, so that every divisors is of the form d = 7 1 a ⋅ 7 3 b ⋅ 7 9 c with a , b , c non-negative integers.
1. Count all triples a , b , c with a + b + c ≤ 9 .
Rationale: If a + b + c > 9 , the divisor d is greater than N . Proof: the smallest possible divisor with a + b + c > 9 is 7 1 1 0 = ( 7 1 3 ⋅ 7 3 2 ⋅ 7 9 4 ) ⋅ ( 7 3 7 1 ) 2 ⋅ ( 7 9 7 1 ) 4 ⋅ 7 1 > N ⋅ ( 2 1 ) 2 ⋅ ( 2 1 ) 4 ⋅ 6 4 = N .
Therefore the set of all triples with a + b + c ≤ 9 is guaranteed to contain all solutions (and several more, which we subtract out later.) To do the counting, consider in how many ways a set of 9 "stars" can be partitioned by placing 3 "bars": n 1 = ( 1 2 3 ) = 2 2 0 .
2. Rule out all triples a , b , c with b ≥ 7 and a + b + c ≤ 9 .
Rationale: Since d must divide N 3 , we require a ≤ 9 , b ≤ 6 , and c ≤ 1 2 . The conditions on a and c are automatically fulfilled is a + b + c ≤ 9 , but we need to rule out the situation b > 6 .
To do the counting, we count "stars-and-bars" for a + ( b − 7 ) + c ≤ 2 : n 2 = ( 5 3 ) = 1 0 .
3. Rule out all triples ( a , b , c ) ≤ ( 3 , 2 , 4 ) .
Rationale: Such triples corresponds to the divisors of N itself.
The count is simply n 3 = ( 3 + 1 ) ⋅ ( 2 + 1 ) ⋅ ( 4 + 1 ) = 6 0 .
4. Rule out the triples with a + b + c = 9 and b ≤ 6 for which the divisor is too great ( d > N ) .
Rationale: If a + b + c < 9 the divisor is certainly less than N . Proof: the largest possible divisor with a + b + c < 9 is 7 9 8 , and using a similar technique as under (1) we can show it is less than N . But if a + b + c = 9 the divisor may be either less or greater than N .
(Incidentally, it is not difficult to count that there are 49 divisors for which a + b + c = 9 and b ≤ 6 .)
a. We take our starting point in N itself, which corresponds to ( a , b , c ) = ( 3 , 2 , 4 ) . (We ruled this out in step (3) above.)
b. One way to increase the divisor is to replaces factors 71 by 73 or 79; or factors 73 by 79. This corresponds to the 17 triples with a ≤ 3 and c ≥ 4 (but not both equal): ( 3 , 1 , 5 ) , ( 3 , 0 , 6 ) , ( 2 , 3 , 4 ) , ( 2 , 2 , 5 ) , ( 2 , 1 , 6 ) , ( 2 , 0 , 7 ) , ( 1 , 4 , 4 ) , ( 1 , 3 , 5 ) , ( 1 , 2 , 6 ) , ( 1 , 1 , 7 ) , ( 1 , 0 , 8 ) , ( 0 , 5 , 4 ) , ( 0 , 4 , 5 ) , ( 0 , 3 , 6 ) , ( 0 , 2 , 7 ) , ( 0 , 1 , 8 ) , ( 0 , 0 , 9 ) .
c. A more subtle way to increase the divisor is to replace two factors 73 by 7 1 ⋅ 7 9 . This works because 7 1 ⋅ 7 9 > 7 3 2 . We obtain the triple: ( a , b , c ) = ( 4 , 0 , 5 ) .
d. Replacing a factor 79 by 73 lowers the value of the divisor; however, this can be compensated by replacing two factors 71 by 73, because 7 1 ⋅ 7 1 ⋅ 7 9 > 7 3 3 . This gives the final triple to be ruled out: ( a , b , c ) = ( 0 , 6 , 3 ) .
e. All other triples in this category correspond to divisors less than N . They are obtained by replacing higher factors by lower factors, or by substituting 7 3 2 for 7 1 ⋅ 7 9 . In either case the value decreases.
Thus in this category we rule out n 4 = 1 9 cases.
Finish up:
The number of divisors that meet the conditions is n 1 − n 2 − n 3 − n 4 = 2 2 0 − 1 0 − 6 0 − 1 9 = 1 3 1 .