Faculty Selection Cut-Off

Calculus Level 3

A university is looking to fill one vacant faculty position. There are n n candidates whom the university interviews sequentially , and assigns a score in the range [ 0 , 100 ] [0,100] immediately after interviewing. Before the interviews, it is known that the scores of the candidates are independently and uniformly distributed in [ 0 , 100 ] [0,100] . For i 1 i\geq 1 , the university interviews the ( i + 1 ) th (i+1)^\text{th} candidate only if it rejects all previous candidates numbered 1 1 to i i . If the university selects the i th i^\text{th} candidate, it cannot interview candidates numbered i + 1 i+1 to n n and the selection process terminates immediately. The goal of the university is to maximize the expected score of the selected candidate. Let M n M^*_n be the minimum score of the first candidate for which the university selects him under the optimal policy . Find lim n n ( 100 M n ) . \lim_{n \to \infty} n(100-M^*_n). Enter 1 -1 as your answer if you believe that the above limit does not exist.

Image courtesy: Google


The answer is 200.00.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Abhishek Sinha
Jul 16, 2018

Relevant wiki: Continuous Probability Distributions - Uniform Distribution

For ease of typing, we will rescale the range of score to [ 0 , 1 ] [0, 1] by dividing the score of each candidate by 100 100 .

Let the cut-off score of the first candidate be t t . Also, let the random variable Z n Z_n denote the score of the selected candidate (from n n candidates) and X 1 X_1 denote the score of the first candidate. Then we can write down Z n Z_n in terms of Z n 1 Z_{n-1} as follows: Z n = 1 ( X 1 t ) X 1 + 1 ( X 1 < t ) Z n 1 . Z_n= 1(X_1 \geq t)X_1 + 1(X_1 < t)Z_{n-1}. Taking expectations of both sides and recalling that X 1 Z n 1 X_1 \perp Z_{n-1} , we have E ( Z n ) = E ( X 1 1 ( X 1 t ) ) + P ( X 1 < t ) E ( Z n 1 ) = t 1 x d x + t E ( Z n 1 ) = 1 2 ( 1 t 2 ) + t E ( Z n 1 ) . \mathbb{E}(Z_n)=\mathbb{E}(X_1 1(X_1\geq t))+ \mathbb{P}(X_1<t)\mathbb{E}(Z_{n-1}) = \int_{t}^{1} x dx + t\mathbb{E}(Z_{n-1})=\frac{1}{2}(1-t^2)+t\mathbb{E}(Z_{n-1}). The optimal threshold t = M n t=M^*_n is obtained by setting the derivative of E ( Z n ) \mathbb{E}(Z_n) w.r.t. t t to 0 0 , yielding M n = E ( Z n 1 ) . M^*_n= \mathbb{E}(Z_{n-1}). Thus, we have the following recursion for M n M^*_n : M n = 1 2 ( 1 + ( M n 1 ) 2 ) , M^*_n= \frac{1}{2}\big(1+(M^*_{n-1})^2\big), with M 1 = 0 M^*_1=0 . Define ϵ n = ( 1 M n ) , n 1 \epsilon_n=(1-M^*_n), n\geq 1 . This yields the following recursion in ϵ n \epsilon_n : ϵ n = ϵ n 1 1 2 ϵ n 1 2 , ( 1 ) \epsilon_{n}=\epsilon_{n-1}-\frac{1}{2}\epsilon_{n-1}^2, \hspace{20pt}(1) with ϵ 1 = 1 \epsilon_1=1 . It is easy to show that ϵ n 0 \epsilon_n \searrow 0 . Hence, we have ϵ n ϵ n 1 = 1 1 2 ϵ n 1 n 1. ( 2 ) \frac{\epsilon_n}{\epsilon_{n-1}}=1-\frac{1}{2}\epsilon_{n-1} \stackrel{n\to \infty}{\longrightarrow} 1. \hspace{20pt}(2) From Eqn. (1), we have k 2 \forall k \geq 2 : ϵ k ϵ k 1 ϵ k ϵ k 1 = 1 2 ϵ k 1 ϵ k . \frac{\epsilon_k-\epsilon_{k-1}}{\epsilon_k \epsilon_{k-1}}=-\frac{1}{2}\frac{\epsilon_{k-1}}{\epsilon_k}. Summing up the above for k = 2 k=2 to n n and dividing both sides by n n , we have 1 n 1 n ϵ n = 1 2 ( 1 n k = 2 n ϵ k 1 ϵ k ) . \frac{1}{n}-\frac{1}{n\epsilon_n}=-\frac{1}{2}\bigg(\frac{1}{n}\sum_{k=2}^{n}\frac{\epsilon_{k-1}}{\epsilon_k}\bigg). Taking limit as n n\to \infty and using the Cesaro mean theorem in conjunction with (2), we have

lim n n ( 1 M n ) = 2. \lim_{n \to \infty}n(1-M^*_n)=2.

The answer finally follows by scaling back the limit, i.e., multiplying both sides by 100 100 .

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...