If x , y , z are positive real numbers satisfying x y z = 3 2 , find the minimum value of
x 2 + 4 x y + 4 y 2 + 2 z 2 .
Source: BMO 2000 #2
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Oh yeah, there's AM-GM.
please what's AM-GM
Log in to reply
It's Arithmetic Mean-Geometric Mean.
superb your solution is perfect
Sorry i was saying wrong.
OOps!! I'm really bad in maths!!
it was so simple!!!! I am really a great stupid.....Grrr..
Same solution as mine
How did you know how to break up the variables??
Log in to reply
I wanted the powers of x , y , z to be the same so that I can make the substitution, then played around a bit.
can't we do (x+2y)^2>=0 and 2z^2>=0 so adding those two inequalities we get that the minimum value is 0??? is this not possible because xyz=32??
Log in to reply
Ya so 0 is not possible that's why it is not minimal.
How did you show equality occurs at (4,2,4)
Take x=y=z and the answer you get will be lesser.
( x − 2 y ) 2 ≥ 0 ⟹ x 2 + 4 x y + 4 y 2 + 2 z 2 ≥ 8 x y + 2 z 2 ( z − 4 ) 2 ≥ 0 ⟹ 8 x y + 2 z 2 ≥ 8 x y + 1 6 z − 3 2 8 ( x y − 2 z ) 2 ≥ 0 ⟹ 8 x y + 1 6 z − 3 2 ≥ 9 6 x 2 + 4 x y + 4 y 2 + 2 z 2 ≥ 9 6 4 2 + 4 ⋅ 4 ⋅ 2 + 4 ⋅ 2 2 + 2 ⋅ 4 2 = 9 6
That's with sum of squares. By AM-GM, which is sum of squares in disguise,
( x + 2 y ) 2 + 2 z 2 ≥ ( 2 2 x y ) 2 + 2 z 2 = 8 x y + 2 z 2 ≥ 8 x y + 2 ( 8 z − 1 6 ) = 8 x y + 1 6 z − 3 2 ≥ 2 8 ( 1 6 ) x y z − 3 2 = 3 ( 3 2 ) = 9 6
with equality at ( x , y , z ) = ( 4 , 2 , 4 ) .
Log in to reply
It's not bad to use calculus to motivate an elementary solution.
Motivation for the z 2 ≥ 8 z − 1 6 rather than, say z 2 ≥ 2 z − 1 :
∇ [ x 2 + 4 x y + 4 y 2 + 2 z 2 ] = ⟨ 2 x + 4 y , 4 x + 8 y , 4 z ⟩ ∇ [ x y z ] = ⟨ y z , z x , x y ⟩
Lagrange multipliers suggests that
y z 2 ( x + 2 y ) = z x 4 ( x + 2 y ) = x y 4 z
From the first two equalities, x = 2 y . From the third with the first, z = 2 y . From x y z = 3 2 , ( x , y , z ) = ( 4 , 2 , 4 ) . Lagrange multipliers suggests that this is the only equality case, so inequalities such as ( z − 1 ) 2 ≥ 0 or ( z − 2 ) 2 ≥ 0 won't seem as fruitful as ( z − 4 ) 2 ≥ 0 .
Using AM-GM inequality,
x 2 + 2 x y + 2 x y + 4 y 2 + z 2 + z 2 ≥ 6 × 6 2 ∗ 2 ∗ 4 ∗ ( x y z ) 4
⇒ x 2 + 4 x y + 4 y 2 + 2 z 2 ≥ 6 × 6 2 ∗ 2 ∗ 2 2 ∗ ( 2 5 ) 4
⇒ x 2 + 4 x y + 4 y 2 + 2 z 2 ≥ 9 6
And the equality occurs at ( x , y , z ) ≡ ( 4 , 2 , 4 ) .
You must show that the equality indeed occurs. Most people forget about checking the equality case which is one of the most important parts in a maxima/minima finding problem.
Log in to reply
Late but edited.
Hello. Why do we need to show equality occurs?
Here's a technique for splitting the terms while applying AM-GM inequality. (I find this quite akin to balancing a chemical equation.)
Let each of the terms be split into a, b, c and d parts respectively.
x 2 + 4 x y + 4 y 2 + 2 z 2 = a a x 2 + b b 4 x y + c c 4 y 2 + d d 2 z 2
For using AM-GM inequality, the powers of x, y and z should be the same in the product of the terms. So, Power of x 2 a + b = Power of y 2 c + b = Power of z 2 d One possible solution is a = c = 1 , b = d = 2
Thus, the expression becomes: x 2 + 2 4 x y + 2 4 x y + 4 y 2 + 2 2 z 2 + 2 2 z 2
Using AM-GM Inequality, A M ≥ G M 6 x 2 + 2 4 x y + 2 4 x y + 4 y 2 + 2 2 z 2 + 2 2 z 2 ≥ 6 1 6 x 4 y 4 z 4 x 2 + 4 x y + 4 y 2 + 2 z 2 ≥ 6 6 2 4 3 2 4 x 2 + 4 x y + 4 y 2 + 2 z 2 ≥ 9 6 So min value = 9 6 (when x = z = 4 , y = 2 )
Why it has to be equal ?(assuming that question is different from this , since in this one it's actually mentioned that product is 32 , so we try to get that in products section) . Also how about putting a=b=c=2 and d=3.
Log in to reply
We are given the value of x y z , so we need something like ( x y z ) n under the root to compute the GM.
I just equated as many variables possible to 1 to make the calculation easier. But it seems any other solution yields a value less than 96.
There you go....Great question....Demanding quite some creativity....Post a few more harder problems..
great example's solution for beginners like me thanks
f ( x , y ) = x 2 + 2 x y + 4 y 2 + 2 z 2 = ( x + 2 y ) 2 + 2 z 2 = ( x + 2 y ) 2 + x 2 y 2 3 2 2 ;
we have imposed x y z = 3 2 ; z = x y 3 2 ;
g r a d ( f ) = 0 , which leads to:
{ x + 2 y = x 3 y 2 2 1 1 x + 2 y = x 2 y 3 2 1 0 ( 1 )
equating 2nd members of the two equations of ( 1 ) , because 1st members are equal:
2 x 2 y 3 = x 3 y 2 ; x = 2 y ; substituting in 1st equation of ( 1 ) :
x 6 = 2 1 2 ; x ∗ = ± 4 ; y ∗ = ± 2
f ( x , y ) is sum of all positive values, so has no maximum, so ( x ∗ , y ∗ ) are points of minima, and the minimum is:
f ( x ∗ , y ∗ ) = 9 6
We can also break the expression as
x 2 + 2 x y + 2 x y + 4 y 2 + z 2 + z 2
And then apply AM-GM inequality to it we get
x 2 + 4 x y + 4 y 2 + 2 z 2 ≥ 9 6
Since x 2 + 4 x y + 4 y 2 + 2 z 2 = x 2 + 2 x y + 2 x y + 4 y 2 + z 2 + z 2 and by AM-GM inequality :
x 2 + 2 x y + 2 x y + 4 y 2 + z 2 + z 2 ≥ 6 6 1 6 x 4 y 4 z 4 = 9 6
Equality occurs when x = z = 4 and y = 2 .
We have (x + 2y)^2 ≥ 8xy with equality iff x = 2y. Hence (x + 2y)^2 + 2z^2 ≥ 256/z + 2z^2 with equality iff x = 2y. We have z^2 + 128/z - 48 = (z - 4)^2(z + 8)/z ≥ 0 with equality iff z = 4 (for positive z). Hence 256/z + 2z^2 ≥ 96 with equality iff z = 4. So the expression given has minimum value 96, achieved only at x = 4, y = 2, z = 4.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
x 2 + 4 x y + 4 y 2 + 2 z 2 = ≥ AM GM = = x y z = 3 2 = x 2 + 2 x y + 2 x y + 4 y 2 + z 2 + z 2 6 6 x 2 ⋅ 2 x y ⋅ 2 x y ⋅ 4 y 2 ⋅ z 2 ⋅ z 2 6 6 2 4 ( x y z ) 4 6 6 2 4 ⋅ 2 2 0 9 6 Equality occurs at ( x , y , z ) = ( 4 , 2 , 4 ) , so 9 6 indeed is the minimum.