Far, far away

A non-conducting thin rod of lenth 1 m has 1 coulomb of charge placed on it uniformly. Very far away from the rod, the electric field will drop off as some power 1 / r n 1/r^n . What is n ? n?


The answer is 2.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Ratnottam Das
Dec 14, 2013

Charge per unit length is 1 C / m 1 C/m

For an element d x dx on the wire, charge is 1 × d x C / m 1 \times dx C/m

We know,

Field due to charge d x dx at any distance r r is

d x / r 2 dx/r^{2}

To find out field at r r ,

Let us assume the point at distance d d lies on the perpendicular from the centre O O

Therefore by Pythogoras Theorem , r 2 = x 2 + d 2 r^{2}=x^{2}+d^{2} ,

Where x x is the distance of element d x dx on the wire from mid-point O O

Therefore the total field at distance d d from the wire is

1 / 2 1 / 2 d x . / ( x 2 + d 2 ) = 1 / d × [ t a n 1 x / d ] 1 / 2 1 / 2 \int_{-1/2}^{1/2} dx./(x^{2}+d^{2})=1/d \times [tan^{-1} x/d]_{-1/2}^{1/2}

Since d > > x d>>x

Therefore, t a n 1 x / d tan^{-1}x/d tends to x / d x/d

Substituting x / d x/d for t a n 1 x / d tan^{-1}x/d

We get-

1 / d × [ x / d ] 1 / 2 1 / 2 1/d \times [x/d]_{-1/2}^{1/2}

And that leads to

1 / d 2 1/d^{2}

Therefore, the answer is 2 2

shouldnt the answer be -2 then

Akshit Johry - 7 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

the electric field will be dropped off to the power of 2

gopal chpidhary - 7 years, 5 months ago

if the rod is very far away then v can consider it a point charge so the answer should be -2, 2 is wrong....and u hav considered the point directly above rod....what if pt is far 2 the right or left such that its perpendicular does'nt fal on rod then it is wrong

Shivansh Rajolia - 7 years, 5 months ago

i don't know how to write my own solution so i'm using your comment box!!! E=1/4PiEpsilon * (q/x(x+L)) where, q is charge on rod, L is length of rod and x is distance from rod... when x >> 1, we get E~ 1/4PiEpsilon * q/x^2.... Thus electric field drops with a power 2.

Priyansh Agrawal - 7 years, 5 months ago

Very Mathematical

Aditya Dutta - 7 years, 4 months ago

BUT far far away a thin rod behaves as a line of charge not a point charge so ans is 1

zalmey khan - 7 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

The rod has a finite length. Would you really be able to tell the different between the electric field from a point, and the electric field from a 1 meter long rod if you were one million miles from the endpoint of the rod?

Josh Silverman Staff - 7 years, 3 months ago

LOL :D i solved it with adding charge nd lenght :P

Saqlain Shoaib - 7 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

I don't think that is going to work very well in general.

Josh Silverman Staff - 7 years, 2 months ago
S.M. Hoq
Feb 22, 2014

take a slice of the road and make sure you get a circle whose area will be pi (radius)^2 now think about the situation#a rod(a pure rod)#charge#uniform distribution#etc(given problem)!! *remember the closer you look the less you will actually see

Balaji Dodda
Dec 13, 2013

Very far away from the rod, we see it is a point charge rather than as a line charge. If the rod were thin infinite then the force would fall of as 1/r but since the rod is finite it will be equivalent to a point charge at very far away distance hence 1/r2.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...