, , and are distinct positive integers, and the sum of any two of these integers is a Fibonacci number .
What is the smallest possible value of ?
If you think there are no possible values for , , and , please put the answer as 0.
Definition:
The first few Fibonacci numbers are .
In general, they satisfy the following recursive relation:
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Solution 1: Direct considerations
After some trial and error, we suspect that the answer is "no solutions". How can we show this?
We have the following observations:
Since we have F y > F z > F x , so z ≤ y − 1 and x ≤ y − 2 . Thus,
F x + F z − F y ≤ F y − 2 + F y − 1 − F y = 0
as desired. In all solutions to the system, a must be non-positive, thus there are no distinct positive integer solutions.
Solution 2: Proof by contradiciton
Suppose that there are positive integer solutions to a + b = F x , b + c = F y , c + a = F z .
WLOG, 1 ≤ a < b < c .
Since F y = c + b > c + a = F z , so y − 1 ≥ z .
We have b − a = F y − F z ≥ F y − F y − 1 = F y − 2 .
So, F y − 2 ≤ b − a < b + a < a + c < b + c = F y .
We have 2 Fibonacci numbers between F y − 2 and F y , which is a contradiction.
Note: This solution arose from the realization that c + a and c + b being Fibonacci numebrs puts a restriction on the size of b .
Note: If the condition of "positive" is relaxed to allow for 0, then equality must hold throughout and thus the only solution is the obvious solution { 0 , F n , F n + 1 } .