Field Optimization

Two particles, each with mass 1 1 , have the following coordinates in the x y xy plane:

x 1 = 1 x 2 = 1 0 y 1 1 0 y 2 1 x_1 = -1 \\ x_2 = 1 \\ 0 \leq y_1 \leq 1 \\ 0 \leq y_2 \leq 1

The y y coordinate of each particle can be anywhere within the given range. There is also a test particle of mass 1 1 at ( x , y ) = ( 0 , 1 ) (x,y) = (0,1) .

What is the maximum possible value of the net gravitational force on the test particle?

Note: Universal gravitational constant G = 1 G = 1 (for simplicity)


The answer is 0.8109.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Karan Chatrath
Sep 13, 2019

The position vectors of the two particles and test particle are: r 1 = i ^ + y 1 j ^ \vec{r}_1 = -\hat{i} + y_1 \hat{j} r 2 = i ^ + y 2 j ^ \vec{r}_2 = \hat{i} + y_2 \hat{j} r 0 = j ^ \vec{r}_0 = \hat{j}

The forces acting on the test particle due to each of the other two particles are: F 10 = 1 r 1 r 0 3 ( r 1 r 0 ) \vec{F}_{10} = \frac{1}{\mid \vec{r}_1 - \vec{r}_0 \mid^3} \left(\vec{r}_1 - \vec{r}_0\right) F 20 = 1 r 2 r 0 3 ( r 2 r 0 ) \vec{F}_{20} = \frac{1}{\mid \vec{r}_2 - \vec{r}_0 \mid^3} \left(\vec{r}_2 - \vec{r}_0\right)

The resultant force on the test particle is: F t = F 10 + F 20 \vec{F}_{t} = \vec{F}_{10} + \vec{F}_{20}

Its magnitude is: F m = F t F_m = \mid \vec{F}_{t} \mid

The resulting expression which is a function of y 1 y_1 and y 2 y_2 is a highly nonlinear expression. The objective of this question is to maximise F m F_m subject to the constraints imposed on y 1 y_1 and y 2 y_2 . One can consider computing partial derivatives and equating it to zero. This method does not account for the imposed constraints on the independent variables ( y 1 y_1 and y 2 y_2 ). Solving such an optimization problem would need the satisfaction of the optimality conditions (KKT conditions). Furthermore, the risk here is that there is a possibility of multiple local optima. The occurrence of multiple local optimal points is something I have not checked.

The quickest way is to use a computer program and vary the independent variables in the specified range in small steps until the maximum is found. The answer comes out to be: 0.8109 \boxed{0.8109} .

Thanks for the solution. Indeed, the optimum corresponds to one of the y y values at zero, and the other at 0.67 \approx 0.67

Steven Chase - 1 year, 9 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...