Find the area of the shaded annulus.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
first in the problem, you need to state that both the shaded and non shaded figures are circles.
I assumed these were both circles but this answer only works if we know the two circles were concentric. This was not stated.
Log in to reply
I agree. More information was definitely needed. You also need to assume that the line is tangential.
this is the most clearly stated solution
i just found out interesting way....in option there was only one option which would give dimension to that of area , and was option b(dimension of t^2 is same A )...
Log in to reply
Ya, didn't do any work...it was either none of them or whatever had the correct units...dimensional analysis is what they call it.
It could have been option d......
so we cannot just resort to dimensional analysis.
Nowhere is said the both figures are circles... Also the centre of those figures may not be same point. This mean that we do NOT have enough information and we can NOT determine the shaded area
Log in to reply
Agreed. A lot of assumptions need to made from the diagram. For clarity, those assumptions should be stated in the problem.
By definition, an annulus is "is a ring-shaped object, a region bounded by two concentric circles." See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annulus_(mathematics).
Pythagorean theorem bro, uhhm so Pi times T squared can also be in this form 3.142 times T^2 in order to comply with what's given in the choices, right? LOL
i did the same!
Yeah..its the solution i also formulated but since it comes first so i dont post it anymore...thumbs up to you...5 stars
I have understood it. Than you.
u provided best solution
did not thought of using Pythogoras Theorem
easiest solution..good one..
This is a common MathCounts question. The fast way to do it is as follows. The question never states the radius of any of the circles, but it doesn't matter. Because it didn't state the radius, we can assume that the inner circle has radius 0 . Thus, T is the radius. If T is the radius of a circle that is fully shaded in, then the area is π ∗ T 2 , which is 3 . 1 4 2 ∗ t 2 .
But you cannot assume it is 0; you must just call it "r" or some unknown. Your answer is for a specific case, not a general case.
Log in to reply
Yes you can. The value of r must work for all cases
Log in to reply
One of the answers is 'Cannot Be Determined', so therefore you cannot assume that it must work for all cases, you have to prove it.
How do we know that the figure is a circle? It doesn't look like a circle (in my browser). It looks like an ellipse, but we don't know that, either. And even if it's an ellipse, we don't know the shapes of the inner and outer ellipses. Also, it doesn't say that T is tangent to the inner circle/ellipse/whatever; it looks like it, but unless it says it, we can't assume it. Given the number of things about the figure that aren't specified, the area cannot be determined.
how can you say that'' T=radius =t " very funny ............ u mean inner circle is not present ....
@VISHAL YASH It is not funny. The radius can be of any length here and if we consider a point circle having length approximately equal to zero then T is nothing but the radius of the circle. The length of the radius does not matter here and that is why not given. So we can assume the inner radius as zero.
Shin's reasoning is quite logical and quicker. All that matters is just to find out the area of the shaded region so assuming r=0 is not invalid at all
I agree, it actually makes more sense if you do it that way...it then relates that the area, with its constraints, will always be the same whether r = 0 or if r = infinity.
maybe the right answer was ''can't be determined'', perhaps because the radius of the circles were not specified so you couldn't be assuming the inner circle's radius is 0. I solved the question by integrating T T differential(theta)/2 from 0 to 2pi.
right as R= 2r , t= sqrt (R^2- r^2 ) , t=1.732 * r , area shaded = pi R^2 - PI r^2 = 3 PI r^2 = 3.142*t^2
DONT TELL WRONG SOLUTION
let radius of larger circle be R and smaller be r then, area of annulus =pi(R^2 - r^2) but , R^2 - r^2=T^2 and area=piT^2
But that isn't how it appears in the image; it looks like T is not the "donut width", but rather R. Also, R^2 - r^2 is not necessarily the donut width squared as quadratics will create some additional issues.
R^2 - r^2 = (R+r) * (R-r) now R-r = T but (R+r) is not known right ?
We have two circles,Let r ans r1 be the radius of small and big circles.From centre if we draw lines to both points where T is shown we get right angled trianle.from this we find the area of Shaded region = pi r1 ^2 -pi( r1 ^2 - T ^2) = pi T^2 that is 3.142 xT^2 Ans K.K.GARG,India
This answer makes sense as it proves why the differences in the radii, each squared, equals T squared. Thank you.
Log in to reply
Thank you Justin Hatt!! I always try to go with basics to understand easily. K.K.GARG,India
Brilliant!
Great! I am totally stumped.
@Krishna Garg Why do you always write your name after posting a solution? Btw, good solution.
Log in to reply
To motivate others that there is no age for learning ,good that you noticed and appreciated the solution.Thanks.
first imagine the radius of small circle to be 'r' and big circle be 'R' using these find the areas we get a1=pi r^2 for small circle a2=pi R^2 for big circle. subtract the area of big circle by smaller one then we get A= pi (R^2-r^2)----------(1) [using pythagoras theorem] we get R^2=r^2 +t^2------------(2) then t^2=(R^2-r^2)---------------------(3) substitute in equation 1 we get A=pi (t^2)---------------------(4)
Not very clear, Try using LaTeX
The image given is of two ellipses and the solution given is that of two circles ! Please ensure that images are printed properly.
B y p y t h a g o r e a n t h e o r e m ,
T 2 = R 2 − r 2
A s h a d e d = A b i g c i r c l e − A s m a l l c i r c l e = π R 2 − π r 2 = π ( R 2 − r 2 ) = π T 2
well... if one looks at the solution it is clear that the area can not be something like T^3 or T^0.5, so you are left with 2 options. I calculated it anyway, but please consider adding wiser solutions, otherwise it is too easy.
Let us assume that the radius of the Inner circle is r, and radius of outer circle is R.
From the centre let us draw an inner radius line segment touching the tip of tangent, and draw the outer radius line segment where tangent touches the outer circle. By properties of tangents the line segments representing T, r and R form a right angled triangle, giving:
R² = r² + t²
We get : t² = R² - r²
Now, the required area is given by : Are of outer circle - Area of inner circle : Area = πR² - πr² = π(R² - r²) = πt² = 3.142 x t²
Area = pi(bigger radius square-smaller radius square) By pythagoras theorem , t^2=R^2 - r^2 Area=pi * t^2
This is a good question and an ow some relation.. A triangle satisfying Pythagoras Theorem is in there...
as R= 2r t= sqrt (R^2- r^2 ) , t=1.732 * r , area shaded = piR^2 - PI r^2 = 3PI r^2 = 3.142*t^2
It appears that the shape is elliptical and the area of the shaded region cannot be calculated with the given data.
I understand the solutions but Tis not equal to R-r. If you erect another tangent T prime and connect the points at which the two intersect the circle and Put R and r on the same line it is obvious. What am I missing?
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Consider this: hi So, the area of the shaded figure is A = π R 2 − π r 2 = π × ( R 2 − r 2 ) Using Pythagoras Theorem, this is equals to π × ( T 2 ) Since T 2 = R 2 − r 2