A B C is an equilateral triangle with side length 1. Square D E F G is placed in triangle A B C such that points E , F , and G are on segments A B , B C , and C A , respectively.
What is the length of the perpendicular from point D to segment B C ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
That's precisely how I did it as well. But would love to see a proof for the generic case - that is, why is the height constant for all positions of the square?
Log in to reply
Ramasamy, all parts of your comment are the same as mine. I assumed independence as Arjen did and then did calculations as he presented. I would also be interested in the proof of the generic case (which I might work on if I can find the time).
Make sense.. But how do you know f is divided the base for tow halves?
Log in to reply
I assumed I could pick F anywhere, because the answer apparently does not depend on this choice :)
because the angle of EFG is 90degree and all four sides in a square are equal,so F should seperate the triangle base by half
An even easier simplification can be be made if you wave away having the square inside the triangle. That is, the constraint in the question is only for 3 vertices to lie on the each of the triangles edges. It can be shown that the height of D is independent of whether D is inside or outside. Moving Vertex E down to Vertex B makes the height of D the same as the length of the side of the square, which is easy to work out.
This solution is too restrictive: the length of DF is constant, wherever F may be on BC.
To prove that the length of DF is constant is rather simple. Let M be the projection of E on BC and let N be the projection of G on BC. The triangles EMF and FNG are equal because they have equal angles and one side equal, viz EF=FG which is the side of the inner square. Hence EM=FN and MF=GN Now BM=EM sqrt(3) and NC=GN sqrt(3) because the angle in B and C is 60°
Sorry, here is the continuation: the side BC = BM+ MF + FN + NC = EM / sqrt(3) + MF + FN + GN / sqrt(3) BC = FN / sqrt(3) + MF + FN + MF / sqrt(3) = (mf+fn)*( 1+ 1/sqrt(3) ) = MN * (1 + sqrt(3))/sqrt(3) Hence MN = BC * (3- sqrt(3) )/2 Now MN = DH , indeed MN is the projection of the diagonal EG on the horizontal, which is equal to the projection of the other diagonal DF onto the vertical, since DEFG is a square. So the answer is DH = (3- sqrt(3) )/2 independently of the place of F.
It can be shown that the length of the perpendicular is a constant, regardless of how the square is positioned inside the triangle.
The required length is DC*sin(60).
DC = DG + GC,
DG is equal to sqrt(3)/2/(1 + sqrt(3)/2)
GC = (AC-DG)/2
Vijay, Could you please elaborate?
Clever solution!
DG (the length of the side of the square) changes as D moves. I believe the DG Vijay references is in the last panel, which I will too. Let's look at the triangle CFG, which is 30-60-90, whose sides opposite of the respective angle are related as such a-2a-a√(3).
Let CG = a, then FG = a√(3) = DG. If AC = 1 = CG + GD + AD, then 2a + a√(3) = 1, so a = 1/(2+√(3)).
To find the length of line at point D perpendicular to BC, we can construct a new triangle CDH (which is also 30-60-90 triangle), where H is a point on BC that is perpendicular to D.
Segment CD is a + a√(3) = (1+√(3)) / (2+√(3)). And DH = CD*√(3)/2.
Therefore, DH = (√(3)+3)/(2√(3)+4) ≈ 0.63397.
Nice solution, but could you explain why the perpendicular is a constant value? Im sure that it is easy to see but, sorry...I dont. Thank you so much for this nice solution.
here's a graphic to show that the height is constant:)
Log in to reply
That is an excellent post which demonstrates this... Kudos.
«It can be shown that the length of the perpendicular is a constant», probably yes, sure, but for a correct solution it must be proved. Graphic solution is not so good, in my opinion
Log in to reply
I agree.... in fact, I think that proving it, is actually the challenge of the problem, that really means to afford the problem.
I think it is proved below by Steven Yuan using coordinates.
We use coordinate geometry (with some complex numbers thrown in) to tackle the problem generally. Let B = ( 0 , 0 ) , C = ( 1 , 0 ) , A = ( 2 1 , 2 3 ) , and F = ( f , 0 ) . The line A B can be represented by the equation y = 3 x , and the line A C can be represented by the equation y = − 3 ( x − 1 ) . Thus, if we let g be the x -coordinate of G , then G = ( g , − 3 ( g − 1 ) ) .
Interpret F and G as points in the complex plane i.e. F = f , G = g − 3 ( g − 1 ) i . Point E is a 9 0 ∘ rotation counterclockwise of G about F , so
E = i ( G − F ) + F = i ( ( g − f ) − 3 ( g − 1 ) i ) + f = ( f + 3 ( g − 1 ) ) + ( g − f ) i .
The corresponding point on the Cartesian plane is E = ( f + 3 ( g − 1 ) , g − f . )
Note that E lies on A B , which has the equation y = 3 x . Plugging in our coordinates for E yields
g − f g − f g = 3 ( f + 3 ( g − 1 ) ) = 3 f + 3 ( g − 1 ) = 2 3 − 2 1 + 3 f .
Now, we must find the coordinates of D ; specifically, we want only the y -coordinate of D , since the distance from D to B C is precisely that value. Let D F and E G intersect at M . Since D E F G is a square, M is the midpoint of both D F and E G . The y -coordinate of M is
M y = 2 ( g − f ) − 3 ( g − 1 ) = 2 ( 1 − 3 ) g − f + 3 ,
so the y -coordinate of D is
D y = 2 ( 2 ( 1 − 3 ) g − f + 3 ) − 0 = ( 1 − 3 ) g − f + 3 .
Substituting in the expression for g we found earlier yields
D y = ( 1 − 3 ) ( 2 3 − 2 1 + 3 f ) − f + 3 = 2 3 ( 1 − 3 ) − 2 ( 1 − 3 ) ( 1 + 3 ) f − f + 3 = 2 3 − 3 3 + f − f + 3 = 2 3 − 3 3 + 3 = 2 3 − 3 ≈ 0 . 6 3 4 ,
which is our final answer.
Drop a perpendicular from E to BC and let that line intersect BC at point M. Drop a perpendicular from G to BC and let that line intersect BC at point N. Let the length of EM be a and the length of GN be b. The question is basically asking us to find what a+b is (this can be seen by circumscribing a larger square around square DEFG with MN as one of its sides).
BM=a/sqrt(3) and CN=b/sqrt(3)
MF=b and NF=a.
BM + MF + NF + CN = a/sqrt(3) + b + a + b/sqrt(3) =1.
a(1+1/sqrt(3)) + b(1+1/sqrt(3)) =1
(a+b)(1+1/sqrt(3))=1
a+b=1/(1+1/sqrt(3))
Let x be the measurement of ∠ C F G , s be the length of the side of the square, and H be the point of intersection of the perpendicular from point D to segment B C .
Since △ A B C is an equilateral triangle, ∠ B = 6 0 ° and ∠ C = 6 0 ° , and since D E F G is a square, ∠ E F G = 9 0 ° .
Since the angle sum of △ F G C is 1 8 0 ° , ∠ F G C = 1 8 0 ° − 6 0 ° − x = 1 2 0 ° − x . Then by the law of sines on △ F G C , F C sin ( 1 2 0 ° − x ) = s sin 6 0 ° , which rearranges to F C = sin 6 0 ° s sin ( 1 2 0 ° − x ) .
Since a straight line is 1 8 0 ° , ∠ B F E = 1 8 0 ° − 9 0 ° − x = 9 0 ° − x . Since the angle sum of △ B E F is 1 8 0 ° , ∠ B E F = 1 8 0 ° − 6 0 ° − ( 9 0 ° − x ) = 3 0 ° + x . Then by the law of sines on △ B E F , B F sin ( 3 0 ° + x ) = s sin 6 0 ° , which rearranges to B F = sin 6 0 ° s sin ( 3 0 ° + x ) .
Since each side length of the equilateral triangle △ A B C is 1 , B F + F C = 1 , and substituting the above equations for B F and F C gives sin 6 0 ° s sin ( 3 0 ° + x ) + sin 6 0 ° s sin ( 1 2 0 ° − x ) = 1 , which simplifies to s ( sin x + cos x ) = 2 3 − 3 .
Since D F is a diagonal of the square D E F G with side lengths of s , D F = 2 s , and angle ∠ D F G = 4 5 ° . Since a straight line is 1 8 0 ° , ∠ B F D = 1 8 0 ° − 4 5 ° − x = 1 3 5 ° − x . Since △ D H F is a right triangle, sin ( 1 3 5 ° − x ) = 2 s D H , which simplifies to D H = s ( sin x + cos x ) .
Therefore, since D H = s ( sin x + cos x ) and s ( sin x + cos x ) = 2 3 − 3 , D H = 2 3 − 3 ≈ 0 . 6 3 3 9 7 4 5 9 6 , and is constant regardless of the placement of square D E F G .
As the height of D is apparently independent of the orientation of the square, we can orient it as such to align D directly above F , and use Pythagorean Theorem to easily find a solution:
In this symmetrical orientation, we know A E G is an equilateral triangle since E G is parallel to B C , and it has a side length of D F . The height of an equilateral triangle is equal to 2 3 multiplied by its side length, so we know that the height of triangle A B C is 2 3 , the height of the triangle A E G is 2 D F 3 , and the height of trapezoid E B C G is 2 D F . This means 2 D F 3 + 2 D F = 2 3 , which can be rearranged to D F = 3 + 1 3 , which gives us D F ≈ 0 . 6 3 4 .
Thanks for easy solution
I used a ruler... segment BC equeled 10 cm and the perpendicular segment measured to be 6.5 cm (I wrote .65 for the answer and got it on the first try.)
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Since the answer is apparently independent of the precise choices made, go for symmetry: make B F = F C = 2 1 , so that D lies directly above F .
We then know that in △ B E F , ∠ B = 6 0 ∘ , ∠ F = 4 5 ∘ , from which ∠ E = 7 5 ∘ .
With the Law of Sines, ∠ B E F = ∠ E B F ∴ E F = sin 7 5 ∘ sin 6 0 ∘ ⋅ 2 1 = 0 . 4 4 8 2 8 … . This is the side of the square; the required perpendicular is D F , the diagonal of the square; thus D F = 2 E F = 0 . 6 3 3 9 7 4 … .