Find the sum of all the integer values of x and y which can be plugged in the equation shown.

If x^2 = 1 + y + y^2 + y^3 + y^4

Find the sum of all the integer values of x and y which are greater than 2 which satisfy the above equation.


The answer is 14.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Zico Quintina
May 18, 2018

In this proof we will use the fact that for m , n Z m,n \in \mathbb{Z} , either m 2 = n 2 m^2 = n^2 or m 2 n 2 2 n 1 \bigl \vert m^2 - n^2 \bigr \vert \ge 2n - 1 ; this is because the closest square to n 2 n^2 is ( n 1 ) 2 = n 2 2 n + 1 (n-1)^2 = n^2 - 2n + 1 .

We complete the square on y 4 + y 3 + y 2 + y + 1 \ y^4 + y^3 + y^2 + y + 1 ; the simplest way is by equating coefficients. We get

y 4 + y 3 + y 2 + y + 1 = ( y 2 + 1 2 y + 3 8 ) + α y + β y^4 + y^3 + y^2 + y + 1 = (y^2 + \frac{1}{2}y + \frac{3}{8}) + \alpha y + \beta

Since the perfect square has fractional coefficients, we multiply our equation by the square of the LCD to simplify finding α \alpha and β \beta :

( 8 x ) 2 = ( 8 y 2 + 4 y + 3 ) 2 + 40 y + 55 (8x)^2 = (8y^2 + 4y + 3)^2 + 40y + 55

Now we apply the fact mentioned at the top. If ( 8 x ) 2 = ( 8 y 2 + 4 y + 3 ) 2 \ (8x)^2 = (8y^2 + 4y + 3)^2 , then 40 y + 55 = 0 \ 40y + 55 = 0 , but then clearly y ∉ Z y \not\in \mathbb{Z} . Thus it must be true that

( 8 x ) 2 ( 8 y 2 + 4 y + 3 ) 2 2 ( 8 y 2 + 4 y + 3 ) 1 40 y + 55 16 y 2 + 8 y + 5 16 y 2 + 8 y + 5 40 x + 55 OR 16 y 2 + 8 y + 5 - 40 x 55 16 y 2 32 y 50 0 OR 16 y 2 + 48 y + 60 0 \begin{aligned} \bigl \vert (8x)^2 - (8y^2 + 4y + 3)^2 \bigr \vert &\ge 2 \ (8y^2 + 4y + 3) -1 \\ \\ \bigl \vert 40y + 55 \bigr \vert &\ge 16y^2 + 8y + 5 \\ \\ 16y^2 + 8y + 5 \le 40x + 55 \qquad &\text{OR} \qquad 16y^2 + 8y + 5 \le \text{-}40x - 55 \\ \\ 16y^2 - 32y -50 \le 0 \qquad &\text{OR} \qquad 16y^2 + 48y + 60 \le 0 \end{aligned}

The second quadratic has a negative discriminant, and since its leading coefficient is positive, the second inequality has no solution in R \mathbb{R} . Solving the first, we get

4 66 4 y 4 66 4 - 1.031... y 3.031... \begin{aligned} \dfrac{4 - \sqrt{66}}{4} \le \ &y \ \le \dfrac{4 - \sqrt{66}}{4} \\ \\ \text{-}1.031... \le \ &y \ \le 3.031... \end{aligned}

So y { - 1 , 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 } y \in \{\text{-}1,0,1,2,3\} . Testing these in the polynomial, the only ones that yield squares are - 1 , 0 \text{-}1,0 and 3 3 , and the six solutions ( x , y ) (x,y) are

( - 1 , - 1 ) ; ( 1 , - 1 ) ; ( - 1 , 0 ) ; ( 1 , 0 ) ; ( - 11 , 3 ) ; ( 11 , 3 ) (\text{-}1,\text{-}1); (1,\text{-}1); (\text{-}1,0); (1,0); (\text{-}11,3); (11,3)

and only the last one satisfies the condition in the question. Thus our answer is x + y = 11 + 3 = 14 \ x + y = 11 + 3 = \boxed{14}

Note: we could have shortened the proof a little by applying the condition that our solutions had to be greater than 2 earlier, but this way we found all solutions over the integers.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...