Finding the Sum?

Algebra Level 1

If 1 + 3 + 5 + + 99 = 2500 , 1 + 3 + 5 + \cdots + 99 = 2500 , then what is 3 + 5 + 7 + + 101 ? 3 + 5 + 7 + \cdots + 101 ?

2500 2550 2600 2700

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

34 solutions

Naren Bhandari
Aug 2, 2018

Here, 3 + 5 + + 101 = 3 + 5 + + ( 1 + 100 ) = 1 + 3 + 5 + + 99 Given + 100 = 2500 + 100 = 2600 \begin{aligned} 3 + 5 +\cdots + 101 & = 3 + 5 + \cdots+ \,({\color{#3D99F6}1}+100) \\& = \underbrace{{\color{#3D99F6}1}+3+5+\cdots + 99 }_{\text{Given}} + 100 \\& = 2500 +100 =2600\end{aligned}

Alternatively: Given that , 1 + 3 + 5 + + 99 S = 2500 3 + 5 + + 99 S = 2499 1+\underbrace{ 3 +5 +\cdots+ 99 }_{\text{S}}=2500\implies\underbrace{ 3 +5 +\cdots+ 99 }_{\text{S}}= 2499 We need to find 3 + 5 + 7 + + 99 S + 101 = 2499 + 101 = 2600 \underbrace{3 + 5+7+\cdots +99 }_{\text{ S}} + 101 = 2499 +101 =\boxed{2600}

There is a typo at the end of the first line of equations for your alternatively. It should end with S = 2499 S=2499 , instead of S = 2449 S=2449 .

Roland van Vliembergen - 2 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Thank you ! To point out my typo :)

Naren Bhandari - 2 years, 10 months ago

Why after 99 goes 101 but not a 100?

Вадим Марченко - 2 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

We are dealing with sum of odd number however, 100 is a even number .

Naren Bhandari - 2 years, 10 months ago

Could you explain, sir?

Nathan Teshome - 2 years, 10 months ago

Oh this is not so good

Supriya Manna - 2 years, 9 months ago

Genius!

So good!

Thank you!

Zoe Codrington - 2 years, 9 months ago

Thats what i did but i addwd 100, abd i dont understand why shouldnt i

Eustache Lamort de Gail - 2 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

because the sequence has only odd numbers. 100 is not odd.

Mikael Bashir - 2 years, 8 months ago
Ram Mohith
Jul 25, 2018

Given, is the sum of all odd numbers from 1 99 1 - 99 : 1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + . . . + 99 = 2500 1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + ... + 99 = 2500

Now we are asked to find the sum of all odd numbers from 3 101 3 - 101 . It is simple. Add 101 101 and subtract 1 1 on both sides of the equation : 1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + . . . + 99 + 101 1 = 2500 + 101 1 3 + 5 + 7 + . . . + 99 + 101 = 2600 \begin{aligned} \cancel{1} + 3 + 5 + 7 + ... + 99 + 101 - \cancel{1} = 2500 + 101 - 1 \\ \implies \color{#3D99F6} 3 + 5 + 7 + ... + 99 + 101 = 2600 \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \\ \end{aligned}

it is easier than this, just summ up one by one, and you get it. use androis calculator if you need some help

Ivan Sanczewski - 2 years, 10 months ago
Venkatachalam J
Aug 5, 2018

In the know series 1 + 3 + 5 + … + 99 = 2500, excluding “1” and including “101” gives 3 + 5 + …+ 101 = 2500 - 1 + 101 = 2500 - 1 + 100 + 1= 2500 + 100 =2600.

The missing number in first row is 2392 because 2500-99-5-3-1 = 2392 in the second row every number is added with 2 so 3+5+7+2394 +101= 2510 so the answer for me is 2510

Petros Zavradinos - 2 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

I thought so too until I realized that the three dots, are a filler for every odd # between the others, so add every odd # to 99 gives you the answer 2500, not 2510

Mark H, Stevens,CMS - 2 years, 10 months ago

Relevant wiki: Arithmetic Progression Sum

3 , 5 , 7 , . . . , 101 3,5,7,...,101 is an Arithmetic Progression with a common difference of 2 2

We need to find the number of terms by using the formula a n = a 1 + ( n 1 ) d a_n=a_1+(n-1)d . Substituting, we have

101 = 3 + ( n 1 ) 2 101=3+(n-1)2

98 = ( n 1 ) 2 98=(n-1)2

98 2 = n 1 \dfrac{98}{2}=n-1

n = 50 n=50

Now, we will find the sum of the terms by using the formula s = n 2 ( a 1 + a n ) s=\dfrac{n}{2}(a_1+a_n) . Substituting, we have

s = 50 2 ( 3 + 101 ) = 2600 s=\dfrac{50}{2}(3+101)=\boxed{2600}

Noel Lo
Aug 5, 2018

3 + 5 + 7 + . . . + 101 = ( 1 + 2 ) + ( 3 + 2 ) + ( 5 + 2 ) + . . . + ( 99 + 2 ) = ( 1 + 3 + 5 + . . . + 99 ) + 50 × 2 = 2500 + 100 = 2600 3+5+7+...+101=(1+2)+(3+2)+(5+2)+...+(99+2)=(1+3+5+...+99)+50\times 2=2500+100=\boxed{2600}

Kevin Shi
Aug 5, 2018

To go from 1 + 3 + 5 + + 99 = 2500 , 1 + 3 + 5 + \cdots + 99 = 2500, to 3 + 5 + 7 + + 101 , 3 + 5 + 7 + \cdots + 101, we must subtract 1 1 and add 101 101 . This evens out to a + 100. + 100.

Since 2500 + 100 = 2600 , 3 + 5 + 7 + + 101 = 2600 2500 + 100 = 2600, 3 + 5 + 7 + \cdots + 101 = 2600 as well.

Uttam Manher
Aug 7, 2018

That was simple. You have to just subtract 1 and add 101.

Let's call f ( x ) = 2 x + 1 f(x)=2x+1 positive odd number function.

In one of the Brilliant's solutions,they said that:

f ( 0 ) + f ( 1 ) + f ( 2 ) + + f ( n 1 2 ) = ( n + 1 2 ) 2 f(0)+f(1)+f(2)+\dots+f(\frac{n-1}{2})=(\frac{n+1}{2})^2

Let's b = 3 + 5 + 7 + . . + 101 b={3+5+7+..+101}

Then, b b equals:

b = ( 101 + 1 2 ) 2 f ( 0 ) = ( 102 2 ) 2 1 = 5 1 2 1 = 2601 1 = 2600 b=(\frac{101+1}{2})^2-f(0)=(\frac{102}{2})^2-1=51^2-1=2601-1=\boxed{\large{2600}}

Ivan Haralamov
Aug 10, 2018

Odd number series from 1 till 99 have the following sum: 1 + 3 + 5 + + 99 = 2500 1 + 3 + 5 + \ldots + 99 = 2500

The next series are literally the same shifting one step to the right. Starts from 3 and finishes with 101. T h u s : 2500 1 + 101 = 2600 Thus:\ 2500 - 1 + 101 = 2600

Lys Lol
Aug 9, 2018

Simple solution:2500-1+101=2600.

Sinisa Gligoric
Aug 9, 2018

If we implement this task in some programming language like Python, then it would look like this in the picture below.

Jenne De Gendt
Aug 8, 2018

Substract the first sum from the second, so you get

101 + 99 - 99 +... + 3 - 3 - 1 = 101 - 1 = 100. The second sum is 100 more, so 2500 + 100 = 2600.

K .K
Aug 8, 2018

The formula to find the sum of an arithmetic sequence: s u m = n 2 ( a 1 + a n ) sum =\dfrac{n}{2}(a_1+a_n) To find n (number of terms): n = a n a 1 d i f f e r e n c e + 1 n=\frac{ a_n-a_1 }{difference}+1 Sequence given: 3 , 5 , 7 , , 101 3 , 5 , 7 , \cdots , 101 We first need to find n :
n = 101 3 2 + 1 n=\frac{101-3}{2}+1 n = 49 + 1 n=49+1 n = 50 n=50 Now, we can find the sum: S u m = 50 2 × ( 3 + 101 ) Sum=\frac{50}{2} \times (3+101) = 25 × 104 =25\times104 = 2600 =\boxed{2600}

The first sum may be written in sigma notation as k = 1 50 ( 2 k 1 ) = 2500 \displaystyle\sum_{k=1}^{50} (2k-1) = 2500
The second is written as k = 1 50 ( 2 k + 1 ) \displaystyle\sum_{k=1}^{50} (2k+1) which is equivalent to k = 1 50 ( 2 k 1 ) + k = 1 50 2 \displaystyle\sum_{k=1}^{50} (2k-1) + \displaystyle\sum_{k=1}^{50} 2
k = 1 50 ( 2 k 1 ) + k = 1 50 2 \displaystyle\sum_{k=1}^{50} (2k-1) + \displaystyle\sum_{k=1}^{50} 2 can then be simplified to 2500 + 2 k = 1 50 1 = 2500 + 100 = 2600 2500+ 2 \displaystyle\sum_{k=1}^{50} 1 = 2500+100 = 2600

Daniel Deri
Aug 6, 2018

i got it right but they wrote it pretty confusing, i didnt realized at the beginning if the 101 is after the 99 or not.

You add the last number with the first one, and so on:

(3+101) + (5+99) + (7+97) + ... + (101+3)
= 104 + 104 + 104 + ... + 104

The amount of 104's of this last sum is 50, so we multiply 104*50 and divide it by 2 because we have twice the sum.

Therefore: 104*(50/2) = 2600

My suggestion is to write up both sequences up on top of each other like this:

1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + . . . + 99 = 2500 \thinspace1+3+5+7+...+99\quad\quad\thinspace =2500

3 + 5 + 7 + . . . + 99 + 101 = ? \quad\quad3+5+7+...+99+101 = ?

That way, it is easy to see that the series below lacks a 1 and has one more 101. The difference is therefore +100 and the total sum is 2600.

1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + + 99 = 2500 1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + + 99 1 = 2500 1 3 + 5 + 7 + + 99 + 101 = 2499 + 101 3 + 5 + 7 + + 101 = 2600 \begin{aligned} 1+3+5+7 + \cdots + 99 & = 2500 \\ 1+3+5+ 7 + \cdots + 99 \color{#D61F06} -1 & = 2500 \color{#D61F06} - 1 \\ 3+5+7+\cdots + 99 \color{#3D99F6} +101 & = 2499 \color{#3D99F6} + 101 \\ 3+5+7 + \cdots + 101 & = \boxed{2600} \end{aligned}

Marta Reece
Aug 4, 2018

The two series are the same except the top series has 1 in front, which the second is without, and the second has 101 added at the back instead.

So the sum of the second is up by 101 1 = 100 101-1=100 , so it is equal to 2500 + 100 = 2600 2500+100=\boxed{2600}

Gandoff Tan
Sep 13, 2019

3 + 5 + 7 + + 101 = 1 + 3 + 5 + + 99 1 + 101 = 2500 + 100 = 2600 \begin{aligned} &\quad\space3+5+7+\cdots+101\\ &=1+3+5+\cdots+99-1+101\\ &=2500+100\\ &=\boxed{2600} \end{aligned}

Utsav Playz
Jan 16, 2019

There is a great trick which I used to solve this problem.

First I choose a limit for ex- I want to add the consecutive odd numbers from 1to 9

So I add 1 to 9 ( 9 + 1 ) = 10.

So, now I divide it by 2 ( 10/2 ) = 5

and I square the number. ( 5 * 5 ) = 25

Now, In the given question.

I need to go from 3 to 101. Now, here I used my brain. I considered that I want to go from 1 to 101 and applied all the steps.

==> Add -> 101 + 1 = 102

==> Divide -> 102 / 2 = 51

==> Square the number = 51 * 51 = 2601 ( It's easy just multiply or else I have tricks)

Now, 2601 isn't my answer as I started from 1, but now its easy for me that I will just subtract 1 from it.

= 2601 - 1 = 2600

Here is your answer in a clever way.

Samuel Emeka
Aug 28, 2018

Let us consider 3+5+7......+101 an A.P. Solving for nth term we get 101=50th term. Next we solve for S50 that is the sum of first 50 terms of the A.P.We get 2600.

Data Space
Aug 15, 2018

From (my) theorem:

n = 1 k a n + b = a k ( k + 1 ) 2 + b k \displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{k} an+b = \frac {ak(k+1)}{2}+bk

We can replace the variables and find the required sum. First, we can see that 2 n + 1 = 3 , 5 , 7... 2n+1 = 3, 5, 7... , which is the series we are using in this case. So a = 2 a=2 and b = 1 b=1 . Then we find k k in 2 k + 1 = 101 2k+1=101 , which is 50. So 3 + 5 + 7... + 101 = ( 2 ) ( 50 ) ( 50 + 1 ) 2 + ( 1 ) ( 50 ) = 2600. 3+5+7... + 101 = \frac{(2)(50)(50+1)}{2} + (1)(50) = 2600.

Link for the demonstration of the theorem (only spanish, sorry): https://www.scribd.com/document/384794060/Suma-de-Toda-Funcion-Lineal

Gabriele Minotti
Aug 12, 2018

2500 - 1 +101 = 2600

1+3+...+99=2500 Add +1 and -1 to 3+5+...+101=(1+3+...+99)+101+(-1)=2500+100=2600

Joaquin Albornoz
Aug 11, 2018

According to the legend, genius Gauss solved a similar (and more complicated) problem with this method as a very young child:

Expanding the sequence a bit more you'll have that

1 + 3 + 5 + + 95 + 97 + 99 = 2500 1+3+5+\cdots+95+97+99=2500

Then all you have to do is add up the first integer with the last integer of the sequence, the second with the one preceding the last, etc.:

( 1 + 99 ) + ( 3 + 97 ) + ( 95 + 5 ) + = ( 100 ) + ( 100 ) + ( 100 ) + (1+99) + (3+97) + (95+5) + \cdots = (100)+(100)+(100)+\cdots

Given that the interval [ 1..99 ] [1..99] contains 100 integers only 50 pairs can be made, but since our first sequence only contains odd numbers (which is half of all integers in [ 1..99 ] [1..99] ) only 25 pairs can be made:

25 ( 100 ) = 2500 25 (100) = 2500

2500 = 2500 2500 = 2500

Now using this method on the other sequence implies that:

( 3 + 101 ) + ( 5 + 99 ) + ( 7 + 97 ) + = ( 104 ) + ( 104 ) + ( 104 ) + (3+101)+(5+99)+(7+97)+\cdots=(104)+(104)+(104)+\cdots

25 ( 104 ) = 2600 25(104)=\boxed{2600}

Jakob Rainer
Aug 8, 2018

So the algorithm goes 1+3+5+7+...+99=2500. That means every count it adds 2. Now you have to know how many counts you have got. In this case 50. Know the algorithm goes 3+5+7+9+...+101=?. The things you know it needed 50 counts to get to ?. And you know every count is +2. So you do: 50 counts 2 because you have got +2 at every count means: 50 2=100+2500=2600 That was the way i got the answer and I hope its helpful. ;D

Achyut Dhiman
Aug 8, 2018

Dumbest question ever! I don't want to post a solution

Ervyn Manuyag
Aug 8, 2018

2500-1+101=2600

Simon The Great
Aug 7, 2018

You're taking away 1 and adding 101. So the entire equation has gone up in value by 100.

Thor Stambaugh
Aug 7, 2018

The easiest way is to pair off the numbers 101 plus 3 is 104 There are 25 pairs each adding to 104 104 times 25 = 2600

Abhishek Krishna
Aug 7, 2018

Given sum of 1st series is 2500 but after calculating sum from AP formula we have the sum as 4950. Similarly , calculating the sum of 2nd series from AP formula we have the sum as 5148 but the required sum must be in the same ratio as the ratio is obtained from the sums of the 1st series. So we have the required sum as, (2500/4950)×5148 = 2600

1+2=3, 3+2=5, 5+2=7....99+2=101

Apparently, 2 is the difference for each complementary entry. So, count the number of times you'll need to add 2 between 1 and 99 (which is fifty times, since there are fifty odd numbers between 1 and 99), multiply it by 2 (2x50=100) and add it to 2500 (=2600).

Laszlo Uveges
Aug 6, 2018

The numbers can be divided into groups. Take the sum of the first number and the last one that is 100 in the 1..99 case and 104 in the 3..101 case. Imagine keep "collapsing" the sequence by taking again the first and the last number 3 and 97 and 5 and 99 respectively getting 100 and 104 again. In both case we have 50 numbers resulting in 25 groups. As a result in the first case we get 25 * 100 = 2500 and in the second 25 * 104 = 2600.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...