Let be the group of nonzero complex numbers under multiplication. Consider the homomorphism given by Then the first isomorphism theorem says that
Now and (that is, is onto), so the conclusion is that i.e. is isomorphic to a nontrivial quotient of itself.
What is wrong with this argument?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Nothing is wrong; the statement is true.
Not much to say: the argument is airtight, if I do say so myself! Note that the same argument shows that C ∗ / μ n ≃ C ∗ , where μ n is the set of n th roots of unity ; just replace z 2 by z n in the definition of the homomorphism.
It may seem strange that a group can be isomorphic to a nontrivial quotient of itself, but it is completely possible.
Note that the same argument does not work if C is replaced by R , because the corresponding homomorphism will not be onto: not every real number has a real square root. (Exercise: What does the First Isomorphism Theorem say in this case?)