Let S be the set of all positive integers that can be written as the sum of two or more consecutive positive integers. Let R be the set of all the reciprocals of the squares of the elements of S , i.e., if n ∈ S then n 2 1 ∈ R .
If the sum of all the elements of R is c π a − b , where a , b , c are positive integers, then find a + b + c .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
An elegant solution, as always. Thanks for posting it. :)
At the very least, all odd numbers can be written as a sum of two consecutive integers, since odd numbers are of the form 2 n + 1 , and 2 n + 1 = n + ( n + 1 ) .
Now, consider a number p which you would like to split into k consecutive elements. If k is odd, these elements will have a form of a , a ± 1 , a ± 2 ... a ± 2 k − 1 . Adding them all leads to p = k a for some integer a , which means that to divide p into k consecutive integers, k ∣ p . So, any number that is divisible by a prime number k > 2 can be split into k consecutive integers.
If k is even on the other hand, then we will have p divided as a , a ± 1 , a ± 2 ... a + 2 k for some arbitrary integer k . Now, let us let j = 2 k . Adding them will lead to the statement p = k a + j . and since we know that j ∣ k , this becomes p = j ( 2 a + 1 ) .
We now have the condition such that j ∣ p for p to be divided into k consecutive integers. Following that, we see that 6 2 can be divided into 4 consecutive integers, but not 6 .
So it will be quite evident at this point that every number that is not a power of 2 is not an element of S .
So R will have all reciprocal of squares except those squares of powers of two. OR, this can be expressed as powers of 4 .
Knowing that n = 1 ∑ ∞ n 2 1 = 6 π 2 , and that i = 0 ∑ ∞ 4 i 1 = 3 4 , it will eventually give us the sum of the elements of R as
6 π 2 − 8
And there we have it. 2 + 8 + 6 = 1 6 .
Nice solution. Thanks for posting it. Just a couple of comments:
With k odd and k ∣ p , then p can be written as the sum of k > 2 consecutive integers, but they may not be positive, as is required in the question. For example, 2 2 = 2 × 1 1 can be written as the sum of 1 1 consecutive integers, but these integers will be − 3 , − 2 , − 1 , 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , i.e., negative integers must be included. However, using your analysis for even k , since 2 2 = 4 × 5 + 2 we find that 2 2 can be written as the sum of 4 consecutive positive integers, namely 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 .
With your analysis of even k , since p = j ( 2 a + 1 ) it could only be a power of 2 if 2 a + 1 = 1 ⟹ a = 0 , implying that some of the consecutive integers used would have to be negative, (e.g., − 1 + 0 + 1 + 2 = 2 ). However, say p = 2 0 = 4 ( 2 × 2 + 1 ) . This implies 2 0 can be written as the sum of 8 consecutive integers, but this would involve negative integers, i.e., − 1 + 0 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 2 0 . However, using your analysis for odd k we find that 2 0 can be wriiten as the sum of 5 consecutive positive integers, namely 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 2 0 .
So in summary I'm just concerned about how your proof deals with the possibility of negative integers being involved in the required consecutive integer sums.
Log in to reply
Ah, yes. I no longer specified such as for any composite number out there, given that it is not a power of two, it will have both odd and even factors. So it will be left for the solver to find out which k will appropriately divide the number into positive integer components. :)
Let n ∈ Z + . We can call n a k - polite number if k ∈ Z > 1 and n is the sum of k consecutive positive integers. Also, we say that n is an odd-polite number if there exists at least one odd integer k for which n is a k -polite number, and likewise for the even case. Following then the same idea outlined in the proof by Will Van Noordt under the problem "A special property of a number" , one can notice that:
n is an odd-polite number ⟺ ∃ an odd d ∈ Z > 1 such that d ∣ n ∧ d n ≥ 2 d + 1 ( i )
n is an even-polite number ⟺ ∃ an even p ∈ Z > 1 such that n ≡ 2 p mod p ∧ p n − 2 p ≥ 2 p ( i i )
For a few lines, let's work under the assumption that n is not an odd-polite number. To analyze for which conditions n is or is not an even-polite number, we need to verify wheter there is an integer x ≥ 1 such that n ≡ x mod 2 x , and therefore so that n = ( 2 h + 1 ) x , for a certain h ∈ Z . Furthermore, we set 2 x ( 2 h + 1 ) x − x ≥ x , which leads to h ≥ x , because the second condition above in ( i i ) is required too. It follows that h ≥ 1 holds true, and since accordingly 2 h + 1 > 1 , it is a necessary condition for n being an even-polite number that an odd integer different from 1 is a factor of n . This means that if n is a power of 2 , it cannot be an even-polite number.
Viceversa, if n is not a power of 2 , then there is at least one couple of integers h , x so that n = ( 2 h + 1 ) x and 2 h + 1 > 1 and x ≥ 1 . Hence, there is an odd integer d = 2 h + 1 in Z > 1 which divides n . By our initial assumption that n is not an odd-polite number, ( i ) ⇒ d n < 2 d + 1 , which in terms of h and x implies x < 2 2 h + 2 ⇒ x < h + 1 ⇒ h ≥ x . Thus n is an even-polite number.
We proved: n is not an odd-polite number ⇒ ( n is a power of 2 ⟺ n is not an even-polite number ) ( P )
Also, n is a power of 2 ⇒ ∄ an odd d ∈ Z > 1 : d divides n ⟹ ( i ) n is not an odd-polite number ⟹ ( P ) n is not an odd-polite number ∧ n is not an even-polite number. By De Morgan, this implication is equivalent to: n is an odd-polite number ∨ n is an even-polite number ⟹ n is not a power of 2.
On the other hand, let n not be a power of 2. Assuming n is not an odd-polite number, from ( P ) we know that n is an even-polite number as it is not a power of 2. Since tertium non datur , n is not a power of 2 ⟹ n is an odd-polite number ∨ n is an even-polite number. So we can conclude that: n is the sum of at least two positive integers ⟺ n is not a power of 2
∴ in the problem we have S = Z + ∖ { 2 b : b ∈ Z , b ≥ 0 } , and as a consequence n ∈ S ∑ n 2 1 = n = 1 ∑ ∞ n 2 1 − b = 0 ∑ ∞ 2 2 b 1 = 6 π 2 − 1 − 4 1 1 = 6 π 2 − 8
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
An integer N can be written as a sum of two or more consecutive positive integers precisely when we can find integers 0 ≤ m < n with n − m ≥ 2 such that N = ( m + 1 ) + ( m + 2 ) + ⋯ + n = 2 1 n ( n + 1 ) − 2 1 m ( m + 1 ) = 2 1 ( n − m ) ( n + m + 1 ) Note that n − m , n + m + 1 ≥ 2 are integers of opposite parity that multiply to 2 N . Thus, if N belongs to S , then 2 N has a nontrivial odd factor, and hence N is not a power of 2 .
On the other hand, if N is not a power of 2 , then N has a nontrivial odd factor, and 2 N has a nontrivial even factor. Thus we can write N = a b where 1 < a < b and a , b have opposite parities. One of a , b could be 2 k where k is the index of 2 in 2 N . We can now solve for m , n such that n − m = a and n + m + 1 = b , obtaining integers m , n with 0 ≤ m < n and n ≥ m + 2 . Hence N belongs to S .
Thus S is just the set of numbers that are not powers of 2 , and hence R = 6 1 π 2 − n = 0 ∑ ∞ ( 2 n ) 2 1 = 6 1 π 2 − 3 4 = 6 π 2 − 8 making the answer 1 6 .