⌊ x + 2 1 ⌋ + ⌈ x ⌉ + ⌊ x − 2 1 ⌋ ≥ ⌈ x + 2 1 ⌉ + ⌊ x ⌋ + ⌈ x − 2 1 ⌉ Given that 1 ≤ x ≤ 1 0 0 0 is a real number, find the number of different x 's that satisfy the above inequality.
If you believe there are an infinite number of x 's that satisfy the inequality, then submit − 1 .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
It's interesting that these two integer valued functions are never equal, but still leapfrog back and forth.
I've done in the same process too...
⌊ x + 2 1 ⌋ + ⌈ x ⌉ + ⌊ x − 2 1 ⌋ ≥ ⌈ x + 2 1 ⌉ + ⌊ x ⌋ + ⌈ x − 2 1 ⌉
For now, assume x is an integer. We have
x + x + x − 1 ≥ x + 1 + x + x
This is obviously false so x can't be an integer. Now, rearrange the equation.
0 ≥ ( ⌈ x + 2 1 ⌉ − ⌊ x + 2 1 ⌋ ) + ( ⌊ x ⌋ − ⌈ x ⌉ ) + ( ⌈ x − 2 1 ⌉ − ⌊ x − 2 1 ⌋ )
(The equality sign has been change do, it's now facing the correct way).
We already established x is not an integer, thus ( ⌊ x ⌋ − ⌈ x ⌉ ) = − 1 . The other two sections are either BOTH equal to 0 or 1. If they're both 1, then the sum is greater than 0 and we can't have that.
For both parts to be equal to 0, x = n + 0 . 5 where n ϵ N . Since there are 999 of these between 1 and 1000, out answer is 999.
That's a nice direct comparison.
Note that the inequality sign in the last new line equation should be reversed.
Interesting solution!
Did the same way
Amazingly, this problem is exactly the same as Floor Ceiling Floor Ceiling Floor Ceiling
See if you can figure out why ⌊ x + 2 1 ⌋ + ⌈ x ⌉ + ⌊ x − 2 1 ⌋ ≥ ⌈ x + 2 1 ⌉ + ⌊ x ⌋ + ⌈ x − 2 1 ⌉ ⟺ ⌊ x + 2 1 ⌋ ⌈ x ⌉ ⌊ x − 2 1 ⌋ ≥ ⌈ x + 2 1 ⌉ ⌊ x ⌋ ⌈ x − 2 1 ⌉
There is an obvious casework solution, and a not-so-obvious, but much more enjoyable, solution by algebraic manipulation.
We are under the assumption, of course, that ∣ x ∣ ≥ 1 .
Interesting claim.
Spoiler: Solution to my above claim
Rearrange the inequality to ⌊ x + 2 1 ⌋ + ⌊ x − 2 1 ⌋ − ⌊ x ⌋ ≥ ⌈ x + 2 1 ⌉ + ⌈ x − 2 1 ⌉ − ⌈ x ⌉
I claim that ⌊ x + 2 1 ⌋ + ⌊ x − 2 1 ⌋ − ⌊ x ⌋ = ⌊ x ⌋ ⌊ x + 2 1 ⌋ ⌊ x − 2 1 ⌋
Multiplying both sides by ⌊ x ⌋ gives ⌊ x ⌋ ⌊ x + 2 1 ⌋ + ⌊ x ⌋ ⌊ x − 2 1 ⌋ − ⌊ x ⌋ 2 = ⌊ x + 2 1 ⌋ ⌊ x − 2 1 ⌋ ⌊ x ⌋ ⌊ x + 2 1 ⌋ + ⌊ x ⌋ ⌊ x − 2 1 ⌋ − ⌊ x ⌋ 2 − ⌊ x + 2 1 ⌋ ⌊ x − 2 1 ⌋ = 0 ( ⌊ x ⌋ − ⌊ x − 2 1 ⌋ ) ( ⌊ x + 2 1 ⌋ − ⌊ x ⌋ ) = 0
But this is clearly true as when 0 ≤ { x } < 2 1 then ⌊ x + 2 1 ⌋ − ⌊ x ⌋ = 0 and when 2 1 ≤ { x } < 1 then ⌊ x ⌋ − ⌊ x − 2 1 ⌋ = 0 is true.
The exact same process can be done for ⌈ x + 2 1 ⌉ + ⌈ x − 2 1 ⌉ − ⌈ x ⌉ = ⌈ x ⌉ ⌈ x + 2 1 ⌉ ⌈ x − 2 1 ⌉ so we have proved that version 1 and version 2 of the problem are equivalent.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Similar solution as part 1, so just cut and paste solution and change a bit.
Let f ( x ) = ⌊ x + 2 1 ⌋ + ⌈ x ⌉ + ⌊ x − 2 1 ⌋ , g ( x ) = ⌈ x + 2 1 ⌉ + ⌊ x ⌋ + ⌈ x − 2 1 ⌉ and x = ⌊ x ⌋ + { x } = n + δ , where ⌊ x ⌋ = n and { x } = δ are the integral and fractional parts of x respectively; n and δ are positive for x ∈ [ 1 , 1 0 0 0 ] .
There are four cases of f ( x ) and corresponding g ( x ) as follows:
⎩ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎧ δ = 0 0 < δ < 2 1 δ = 2 1 2 1 < δ < 1 ⇒ { f ( x ) = n + n + ( n − 1 ) g ( x ) = ( n + 1 ) + n + n ⇒ { f ( x ) = n + ( n + 1 ) + ( n − 1 ) g ( x ) = ( n + 1 ) + n + n ⇒ { f ( x ) = ( n + 1 ) + ( n + 1 ) + n g ( x ) = ( n + 1 ) + n + n ⇒ { f ( x ) = ( n + 1 ) + ( n + 1 ) + n g ( x ) = ( n + 2 ) + n + ( n + 1 ) ⇒ f ( x ) < g ( x ) ⇒ f ( x ) < g ( x ) ⇒ f ( x ) > g ( x ) ⇒ f ( x ) < g ( x )
Therefore, for each n ∈ [ 1 , 1 0 0 0 ) , there is a case that f ( x ) > g ( x ) or 9 9 9 x 's that satisfy the inequality.