A particle of mass m = 1 begins at position y = 0 with initial velocity y ˙ = 5 . Throughout its travels, the particle experiences a force in the y direction F y = − y 2 . The particle eventually returns to its starting position at time t f .
Let T ( t ) be the particle's kinetic energy as a function of time. Let V ( t ) be the particle's potential energy as a function of time, measured with respect to y = 0 . The classical action for the particle's path is:
S = ∫ 0 t f ( T ( t ) − V ( t ) ) d t
If the position along this path is y ( t ) , define two deformed paths y 1 ( t ) and y 2 ( t ) .
y 1 ( t ) = 0 . 9 y ( t ) y 2 ( t ) = 1 . 1 y ( t )
Note that these deformations preserve the starting and ending points of the path in space and time (over the relevant time interval). Let the actions for these paths be S 1 and S 2 .
Determine the value of the quantity Q :
Q = ( 1 − S S 1 ) + ( 1 − S S 2 )
Note:
This is a one-dimensional problem
Bonus:
What is the physical interpretation of these results?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
@Steven Chase
Upvoted! Thanks for explaining
Sir can you post post problems of Electrical engineering. Some advance problems, and new concepts..
Thanks for the explanation. Rightly said regarding having gone astray. When I I answered the problem, I expected my answer to be wrong when I noticed that S 1 < S and S 2 < S .
The external force acting on the particle is:
F y = − y 2 The potential energy associated with this force is governed by:
d y d V = − F y d y d V = y 2
Given that the reference is y = 0 , the PE of the system is finally:
V = 3 y 3
Extra details:
Applying conservation of energy:
T + V = T i n i t + V i n i t 2 y ˙ 2 + 3 y 3 = 2 2 5
As time progresses y ˙ decreases: y ˙ = − 2 5 − 3 2 y 3
The particle comes to rest when kinetic energy is zero. This happens when y is governed by: 0 + 3 y f 3 = 2 2 5 y f = ( 2 7 5 ) 1 / 3
Separating variables and integrating:
2 ∫ 0 y f 2 5 − 3 2 y 3 d y = t f
The time taken is multiplied by two to account for the return journey of the particle to y = 0 . Having found the time of motion, the next step is to compute the action which is done as such:
S = ∫ 0 t f ( T − V ) d t
This integral is solved numerically. In fact, all the calculations are performed numerically. The above time duration computation is some extra detail for the problem.
Simulation code attached bolow:
Q = 0 . 0 6
It is strange that the actions S 1 and S 2 are lower than S . I would have expected S to be the least. This result is counter-intuitive.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 |
|
@Karan Chatrath
Upvoted!
Is above code a python code?
Log in to reply
No, it is a MATLAB code. But the exact logic can be used to program in python. You can try if you want. As for the 0.9 and 1.1, those are just factors by which the motion is scaled.
@Karan Chatrath what does 0.9 and 1.1 mean in the problem??
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
@Karan Chatrath has shown the details of how to solve this problem. I will comment on the physical meaning of the results. "Least action" is a misleading name for the principle being considered here. A much better name is "the principle of stationary action". The physical path is one for which a small deformation in the path results in essentially zero change to the action. In this problem, we have introduced a "deformation parameter", which is the multiple out in front of y ( t ) .
y ′ ( t ) = α y ( t )
Suppose we make a plot of the action S ′ vs α . The physical path corresponds to an α value at which the following is true:
d α d S ′ = 0
So on the graph, there should be a local extreme for α = 1 . This means that a small deviation from the physical path (and correspondingly, a small deviation in α ) has no effect on the action (because the slope is locally zero). And since the two other paths have α values just below and just above unity, we expect the actions for those paths to either both be less than (for a local max) or both be greater than (for a local min) the action for the physical path. As it turns out, both action values for the deformed paths are smaller than the action for the physical path, and it is a local maximum.
So the results of this exercise agree with the "stationary action" principle. Looking for "least action" would have led one astray.