Let r 1 , r 2 , r 3 be the roots of polynomial P ( x ) = x 3 + 3 x + 1 . Evaluate the product k = 1 ∏ 3 ( r k 2 + r k + 1 ) .
This problem is posed by Francisco R .
Details and assumptions
For those unfamiliar with the product notation,
k = 1 ∏ 3 ( r k 2 + r k + 1 ) = ( r 1 2 + r 1 + 1 ) ( r 2 2 + r 2 + 1 ) ( r 3 2 + r 3 + 1 ) .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
k = 1 ∏ 3 ( r k 2 + r k + 1 ) = k = 1 ∏ 3 ( r k − 1 r k 3 − 1 ) = k = 1 ∏ 3 ( r k − 1 ( − 3 r k − 1 ) − 1 ) [ r k 3 + 3 r k + 1 = 0 ] = − k = 1 ∏ 3 ( r k − 1 3 r k + 2 ) = − ( r 1 − 1 ) ( r 2 − 1 ) ( r 3 − 1 ) ( 3 r 1 + 2 ) ( 3 r 2 + 2 ) ( 3 r 3 + 2 ) = − r 1 r 2 r 3 − ( r 1 r 2 + r 2 r 3 + r 3 r 1 ) + r 1 + r 2 + r 3 − 1 2 7 r 1 r 2 r 3 + 1 8 ( r 1 r 2 + r 2 r 3 + r 3 r 1 ) + 1 2 ( r 1 + r 2 + r 3 ) + 8 = − − 1 + 3 + 0 − 1 2 7 ( − 1 ) + 1 8 ( 3 ) + 1 2 ( 0 ) + 8 [Vieta’s formulas] = 5 3 5 = 7
Exactly did the same
x
3
+
3
x
+
1
=
(
x
2
+
x
+
1
)
(
x
−
1
)
+
(
3
x
+
2
)
⟹
r
2
+
r
+
1
=
1
−
r
3
r
+
2
∏
(
r
2
+
r
+
1
)
=
∏
(
1
−
r
)
∏
(
3
r
+
2
)
=
f
(
1
)
−
2
7
f
(
−
2
/
3
)
=
7
That's a nice way of using the Remainder Factor Theorem multiple times :)
Exactly, Shaurya. No need to multiply out e.g. the (1-r) terms when we already know that the product is going to equal f(1).
elegant solution.
I actually managed to get the answer by expanding the product itself. Sometimes, bulldozing through is an option too. It took more than half an hour though.
For easy typing, let r 1 = a , r 2 = b and r 3 = c
Therefore:
k = 1 ∏ 3 ( r k 2 + r k + 1 ) = ( a 2 + a + 1 ) ( b 2 + b + 1 ) ( c 2 + c + 1 )
From Vieta's formulas (go check it out if you do not know this),
a + b + c = 0
a b + a c + b c = 3
a b c = − 1
Expand the entire product and you'll get an expression with 27 terms:
( a 2 + a + 1 ) ( b 2 + b + 1 ) ( c 2 + c + 1 )
= a 2 b 2 c 2 + a 2 b c 2 + a 2 c 2 + a b 2 c 2 + a b c 2 + a c 2 + b 2 c 2 + b c 2 + c 2
+ a 2 b 2 c + a 2 b c + a 2 c + a b 2 c + a b c + a c + b 2 c + b c + c
+ a 2 b 2 + a 2 b + a 2 + a b 2 + a b + a + b 2 + b + 1
Sort out the entire mess and split it as below:
( a 2 + a + 1 ) ( b 2 + b + 1 ) ( c 2 + c + 1 )
= a 2 b 2 c 2 + a b c + a b + a c + b c + a + b + c + 1
+ a 2 b 2 c + a 2 b c 2 + a b 2 c 2 + a 2 b c + a b 2 c + a b c 2
+ a 2 + b 2 + c 2
+ a 2 b 2 + a 2 c 2 + b 2 c 2
+ a 2 b + a 2 c + a b 2 + b 2 c + a c 2 + b c 2
Now, I'll solve the split rows one by one.
The first row, you can substitute the values directly from the equations above:
a 2 b 2 c 2 + a b c + a b + a c + b c + a + b + c + 1
= ( a b c ) 2 + a b c + ( a b + a c + b c ) + ( a + b + c ) + 1
= 1 − 1 + 3 + 0 + 1 = 4
For the second row, you can factorize a b c :
a 2 b 2 c + a 2 b c 2 + a b 2 c 2 + a 2 b c + a b 2 c + a b c 2
= a b c ( a b + a c + b c + a + b + c )
= − 1 ( 3 + 0 ) = − 3
For the third row, square the first equation above:
( a + b + c ) 2 = a 2 + b 2 + c 2 + 2 a b + 2 a c + 2 b c
Therefore,
a 2 + b 2 + c 2 = ( a + b + c ) 2 − 2 ( a b + a c + b c )
= 0 2 − 2 ( 3 ) = − 6
For the fourth row, square the second equation above:
( a b + a c + b c ) 2 = a 2 b 2 + a 2 c 2 + b 2 c 2 + 2 a 2 b c + 2 a b 2 c + 2 a b c 2
Therefore,
a 2 b 2 + a 2 c 2 + b 2 c 2
= ( a b + a c + b c ) 2 − 2 a 2 b c − 2 a b 2 c − 2 a b c 2
= ( a b + a c + b c ) 2 − 2 a b c ( a + b + c )
= 3 2 − 2 ( − 1 ) ( 0 ) = 9
The final row is a bit tricky:
a 2 b + a 2 c + a b 2 + b 2 c + a c 2 + b c 2
= a b ( a + b ) + a c ( a + c ) + b c ( b + c )
From equation 1,
a + b + c = 0 ⟹ a + b = − c , a + c = − b , b + c = − a
Substitute the three equations here, and you get:
a b ( − c ) + a c ( − b ) + b c ( − a )
= − a b c − a b c − a b c
= − 3 a b c = − 3 ( − 1 ) = 3
With the values of all 5 rows obtained, we can get the product:
( a 2 + a + 1 ) ( b 2 + b + 1 ) ( c 2 + c + 1 ) = 4 − 3 − 6 + 9 + 3
k = 1 ∏ 3 ( r k 2 + r k + 1 ) = 7
Note: I used this method because I had no other better way to do it, and I didn't want to view solutions. There are much better solutions listed above. I wrote my solution only because I didn't want my efforts to go to waste
Write P ( x ) = x 3 + 3 x + 1 = ( x − 1 ) ( x 2 + x + 1 ) + ( 2 + 3 x ) and since r k are the roots of P ( x ) , then for each k r k 2 + r k + 1 = 1 − r k 2 + 3 r k
Hence, we have k = 1 ∏ 3 ( r k 2 + r k + 1 ) = 1 − ( r 1 + r 2 + r 3 ) + ( r 1 r 2 + r 2 r 3 + r 1 r 3 ) − r 1 r 2 r 3 8 + 1 2 ( r 1 + r 2 + r 3 ) + 1 8 ( r 1 r 2 + r 2 r 3 + r 1 r 3 ) + 2 7 r 1 r 2 r 3 From P ( x ) , we have r 1 + r 2 + r 3 = 0 , r 1 r 2 + r 2 r 3 + r 1 r 3 = 3 , and r 1 r 2 r 3 = − 1 . Then k = 1 ∏ 3 ( r k 2 + r k + 1 ) = 5 3 5 = 7
Good way of using vieta's formula.
Note that we could have expressed it as − P ( 1 ) 3 3 P ( − 3 2 ) . Do you see why?
Since ( r k 2 + r k + 1 ) ( r k − 1 ) = r k 3 − 1 = − 3 r k − 2 , the asked product is equal with the following one: ∏ k = 1 3 r k − 1 − 3 r k − 1 . Now, let the y = x − 1 a subtitution that transform the original ecuation into y 3 + 3 y 2 + 6 y + 5 = 0 and, according to Viete formulas, we have y 1 y 2 y 3 = − 5 , thus ( r 1 − 1 ) ( r 2 − 1 ) ( r 3 − 1 ) = − 5 . Proceeding in the same manner with the subtitution t = − 3 x − 2 , we get the equation t 3 + 6 t 2 + 3 9 t + 3 5 = 0 , so that t 1 t 2 t 3 = − 3 5 . Now, the asked product is − 5 − 3 5 = 7 .
∏ i = 1 3 ( x − r i ) = x 3 + 3 x + 1 = P ( x ) .
∏ i = 1 3 ( r i 2 + r i + 1 ) = ∏ i = 1 3 ( 1 − r i ) ∏ i = 1 3 ( 1 − r i 3 ) = P ( 1 ) Q ( 1 ) , where, Q ( x ) = ∏ i = 1 3 ( x − r i 3 ) .
From P(x) we get, r 1 + r 2 + r 3 = 0 , r 1 r 2 + r 2 r 3 + r 3 r 1 = 3 and r 1 r 2 r 3 = − 1 . Using these three equations, following are easily calculated:
r 1 3 + r 2 3 + r 3 3 = − 3 , r 1 3 r 2 3 + r 2 3 r 3 3 + r 3 3 r 1 3 = 3 0 and r 1 3 r 2 3 r 3 3 = − 1 .
Therefore, Q ( x ) = x 3 + 3 x 2 + 3 0 x + 1 .
P ( 1 ) Q ( 1 ) = 5 3 5 = 7
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Note that P ( x ) = ( x − r 1 ) ( x − r 2 ) ( x − r 3 ) and r k 2 + r k + 1 = ( w − r k ) ( w 2 − r k ) , where w is a primitive cubic root of unity.
Then, our product is ( w − r 1 ) ( w 2 − r 1 ) ( w − r 2 ) ( w 2 − r 2 ) ( w − r 3 ) ( w 2 − r 3 ) , or simply P ( w ) P ( w 2 ) .
P ( w ) P ( w 2 ) = ( w 3 + 3 w + 1 ) ( w 6 + 3 w 2 + 1 ) P ( w ) P ( w 2 ) = ( 2 + 3 w ) ( 2 + 3 w 2 ) P ( w ) P ( w 2 ) = 4 − 2 ( 3 ) + 3 2 P ( w ) P ( w 2 ) = 7