Gamma gamma gameleon

Calculus Level 3

Which of the following is/are used in the derivation of

( s 1 ) ! 0 e t t s 1 d t ? (s-1)! \equiv \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-t}t^{s-1} \, dt\, ?

A. \ Integration by parts
B. \ U-substitution
C. \ Induction

A B C A and B A and C B and C All of them None of them

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Jake Lai
Feb 12, 2015

Let Γ ( s ) 0 e t t s 1 d t \displaystyle \Gamma(s) \equiv \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-t}t^{s-1} \ dt . Then, by integration by parts ,

Γ ( s + 1 ) = 0 e t t s d t \Gamma(s+1) = \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-t}t^{s} \ dt

= e t t s 1 0 0 s e t t s 1 d t = |-e^{t}t^{s-1}|_{0}^{\infty} - \int_{0}^{\infty} -se^{-t}t^{s-1} \ dt

= 0 + s 0 e t t s 1 d t = 0 + s\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-t}t^{s-1} \ dt

= s Γ ( s ) = s\Gamma(s)

Now, Γ ( s ) = ( s 1 ) ! \Gamma(s) = (s-1)! finally seems to be satisfied at first glance, but this is not yet the case.

By induction , if Γ ( n ) = ( n 1 ) ! \Gamma(n) = (n-1)! for some base case n n , then equality holds for all s Z s \in \mathbb{Z} . (We don't need to prove the noninteger cases since we only care about Γ \Gamma corresponding to the original values of the factorial, ie positive integral.)

So, setting n = 1 n = 1 ,

Γ ( 1 ) = 0 e t d t = e t 0 = 1 \Gamma(1) = \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-t} \ dt = |-e^{-t}|_{0}^{\infty} = 1

as desired!

Thus, we require A & C \boxed{\text{A \& C}} .

Can you help me fill this up ? Here I didn't use Induction, so can you please help me out ?

Thanks for the same !!!!

A Former Brilliant Member - 6 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Done. I added the Bohr-Mollerup theorem, Euler's reflection formula, relation to beta function, and then cleaned it up a bit.

Jake Lai - 6 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks a lot !!! ¨ \ddot\smile

A Former Brilliant Member - 6 years, 4 months ago

Very impressive - I like the surprising simplicity of the proof :) Also would you be able to prove the Bohr - Mollerup Theroem and Euler's reflection formula please

Curtis Clement - 6 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Hi Curtis , I had learnt the Euler's Reflection Formula from here .

You might consider reading from there . Also I think we can prove it using Weierstrass Factorization Theorem, so if I prove it using it I'll add it to the wiki .

If possible, why don't you add it yourself ? :)

A Former Brilliant Member - 6 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks for the PDF - I've got half term coming up so I'll research it then :)

Curtis Clement - 6 years, 4 months ago

I'll add a proof to the new wiki soon! :)

Jake Lai - 6 years, 4 months ago

You have proved that integration by parts and induction works in the derivation of Gamma function. Could you prove that the u- substitution doesn't work in the derivation of Gamma function?

Guillermo Templado - 5 years, 4 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...