It seems like I have proven that for and ;
Here's the prove:
Step 1: We have that .
Step 2: Assume that .
Step 3: We have that: This is true for .
Step 4: Using inductive reasoning, the statement above is true for .
I sent this prove to my teacher, and she said I was wrong at some point.
Where did I go wrong in this prove?
(This is actually a real story a while ago.)
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
No explanations have been posted yet. Check back later!