Geometry problem #133126

Geometry Level 1

What is the sum of the angles numbered 1-8?

54 0 540^\circ 63 0 630^\circ 72 0 720^\circ 81 0 810^\circ 90 0 900^\circ

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

7 solutions

Relevant wiki: General Polygons - Angles

The sum of the exterior angles of a polygon is 360 360 . In the problem statement, it is shown that the exterior angles are doubled, therefore the desired answer is 2 ( 360 ) = 2(360)= 720 \color{#D61F06}\boxed{720}

The sum of the exterior angles of a polygon is.... NOT 360º
it's: (N-2)*180

(you meant quadrilateral and wrote polygon...)

Gil Costa - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

(N-2)*180 is the sum of the interior angles of a polygon.

A Former Brilliant Member - 3 years, 8 months ago

Imagine it as a square 90*8=720 Simple

chindukuri pavan - 1 year, 2 months ago
Me Myself
Sep 24, 2017

Relevant wiki: General Polygons - Angles

The total sum of degrees of all four vertices is 4 360 ° = 1440 ° 4·360°=1440° . The sum of the internal angles of a quadrilateral is 360°, and as their vertical angles are equal to them, their sum is also 360°. The only angles we haven't counted are the angles numbered 1-8, So their sum is:

(total angles of 4 vertices)-(quadrilateral internal angles)-(vertical angles to quadrilateral internal angles)= 4 360 ° 360 ° 360 ° = 2 360 ° = 720 ° 4·360°-360°-360°=2·360°=720° .

I barely remember this from middle school in Abu Dhabi-UAE where all science is mandatory.

Nadir Hussain - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

I'm right there with you. I am borderline torturing myself but I have decided that I need to learn it. I struggle with it and want to get better 😁

Mary Trueman - 3 years, 8 months ago
Kevin Tran
Sep 24, 2017

Moderator note:

Let's take a math competition perspective on this answer:

In a competition that requires answering problems via a proof, this answer would not be acceptable, because it proved a specific case and not the general one the problem asks for. (Note that for Brilliant.org solutions, in general we request for full proofs.)

In a competition that only requires an answer (especially one where the answer is needed quite rapidly), this sort of technique of assuming the uniqueness of an answer can be useful. Here's another problem (from a Martin Gardner book) where a similar technique works:

A six inch high cylindrical hole is drilled through the center of a sphere. How much volume is left in the sphere?

If you make the sphere have a radius of 3 inches, the "hole" has a radius of 0. Applying the volume of a sphere formula 4 3 π r 3 , \frac{4}{3} \pi r^3 , the volume "remaining" is 36 π 36 \pi cubic inches.

The angles may not be 90° You have to prove it generally​

avik das - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Not if you're doing a multiple choice question. This answer shows that 720 is the only possible solution of the answers given. There's nothing in the problem that says the quadrilateral isn't a rectangle. Therefore any general solution must also hold in that particular case. And this is a case that is rather easy to solve.

Richard Desper - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

While this is a successful method for getting a correct multiple choice answer, it does not make it a correct proof. (This is similar to our problems which ask for the maximum or minimum way to do something and people produce an example as the "answer" - but they have to prove there is no larger / smaller value to be complete.)

Jason Dyer Staff - 3 years, 8 months ago

As only one of the possible answers can be true and there are no angles given in the question to start with, we must assume that one of the possible answers must be true for any four lines in similar arrangement. Therefore summing up the 90° angles in a perpendicular arrangement of lines leads to the correct sum.

Dustin Frank - 3 years, 8 months ago

@Calvin Lin While it is true that this technique does not provide a proof, it is actually a worthwhile problem solving strategy. If you have no idea of what the problem is like, it is a good idea to play around and try the limiting cases.

Agnishom Chattopadhyay - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Yep, and it's certainly good to have know the answer before you start the proof than work entirely open-ended.

Jason Dyer Staff - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

I am in agreement.

Sometimes I feel an urge to respond to the challenge master's note...

Agnishom Chattopadhyay - 3 years, 8 months ago

I like this approach but in this case it is better to stretch the quadrilateral. It it becomes apparent that 4 of the angles are a bit less than 180 and 4 are a bit more than 0.

Rod Woodford - 3 years, 7 months ago
Venkatachalam J
Sep 26, 2017

Mohammad Khaza
Sep 25, 2017

that's very easy to think.

as there are 4 vertices, total summation of angle is = 360 × 4 = 1440 360 \times 4=1440 degrees

now, there is a quadrilateral which has total 360 degrees(which has not been counted) and its vertical angles are equal.

so, total 360 × 2 = 720 360 \times 2=720 degrees has not been counted.

so, there remains= 1440 720 = 720 1440-720=720 degrees.(that has been wanted) ,

Chew-Seong Cheong
Sep 25, 2017

Let the unmarked opposite angles be a a , b b , c c , and d d as shown in the figure. We note that each point (intersection of two straight lines) is 36 0 360^\circ and the sum of angles numbered 1-8 is given by:

k = 1 8 k + 2 ( a + b + c + d ) = 4 × 36 0 4 points Note that a , b , c , d , are the 4 quadrilateral internal angles. k = 1 8 k + 2 × 36 0 = 4 × 36 0 k = 1 8 k = 72 0 \begin{aligned} \sum_{k=1}^8 \angle k + 2\color{#3D99F6}(a+b+c+d) & = \underbrace{4 \times 360^\circ}_{\text{4 points}} & \small \color{#3D99F6} \text{Note that }a, \ b, \ c, \ d, \text{ are the 4 quadrilateral internal angles.} \\ \sum_{k=1}^8 \angle k + 2\times \color{#3D99F6}360^\circ & = 4 \times 360^\circ \\ \implies \sum_{k=1}^8 \angle k & = \boxed{720^\circ} \end{aligned}

Austin Payton
Sep 29, 2017

The logic I used was the fact that each intersection equated to 360°, therefore two of the angles must be equal to 180°. So...

4*180=720

*two angless on opposite sides

Austin Payton - 3 years, 8 months ago

I used almost the same as that, but that four angles equal 360, so 360 times 2 as there are 8 angles.

gh dgfhdgf - 3 years, 3 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...