f ( a , n ) = r = a − 1 ∑ 2 a − 1 k = 1 ∑ n n r + 1 k r
Find f ( 1 0 7 , 1 0 7 ) to 1 decimal place.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Um I don't know how to respond to this really. I'm stunned by your thorough analysis despite it has gaps that my knowledge fails to help me fill. Utterly speechless..
@Rohith M.Athreya How this can be a JEE question ???
Log in to reply
By sheer rotten luck :P
If u read what I have named the set,it says problems FOR jee aspirants and not jee type problems
yes i did like too considered n as infinity :) (but not with this much perfection :P)
i was too overconfident. ur=k^r/n^(r+1) i thought u1+u2+......+un can be approximated by integral of x^r from 0 to 1. the integral is 1/(r+1). now we get 1/a +1/a+1+...........1/2a this i approximated by integral of ln(x+1) from 0 to 1. i got a horribly wrong answer. your approach is nice. just i am not understanding why i ended with such a horrible answer. at least my wrong answer should have been closer to the actual answer.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
This is a complicated piece of convergence and error analysis. We shall do this in stages. First note that − ln ( 1 − x ) > x for all 0 < x < 1 and also that − ln ( 1 − x ) < x + x 2 for all 0 < x < 2 1 .
We deduce from the above that ( 1 − n x ) 2 n ≤ e − 2 x for all 0 < x < n , and that ( 1 − n x ) 2 n > e − 2 x − n 2 x 2 for all 0 < x < 2 1 n . Let us define α n , k = { k 1 ( 1 − n k ) 2 n 0 1 ≤ k ≤ n − 1 k ≥ n A = k = 1 ∑ ∞ k e − 2 k = ln ( e 2 − 1 e 2 ) Then we note that 0 ≤ α n , k ≤ k e − 2 k k ≥ 1 , n ≥ 2 n → ∞ lim α n , k = k e − 2 k k ≥ 1 Thus the Dominated Convergence Theorem tells us that n → ∞ lim k = 1 ∑ n − 1 k 1 ( 1 − n k ) 2 n = n → ∞ lim k = 1 ∑ ∞ α n , k = k = 1 ∑ ∞ k e − 2 k = A Since 3 e 4 ( e 2 − 1 ) > 1 0 0 0 we note that 0 ≤ A − k = 1 ∑ n − 1 k 1 ( 1 − n k ) 2 n = k = 1 ∑ ∞ ( k e − 2 k − α n , k ) ≤ k = 1 ∑ 2 ( k e − 2 k − α n , k ) + k = 3 ∑ ∞ k e − 2 k < k = 1 ∑ 2 k 1 [ e − 2 k − ( 1 − n k ) 2 n ] + 1 0 − 3 for all n ≥ 3 . But then 0 ≤ A − k = 1 ∑ n − 1 k 1 ( 1 − n k ) 2 n ≤ k = 1 ∑ 2 k 1 e − 2 k [ 1 − e − n 2 k 2 ] + 1 0 − 3 ≤ k = 1 ∑ 2 k e − 2 k × n 2 k 2 + 1 0 − 3 = n 2 k = 1 ∑ 2 k e − 2 k + 1 0 − 3 < 2 × 1 0 − 3 using the Mean Value Theorem, provided that n > 3 5 0 .
We now define β n , k = { k 1 ( 1 − n k ) n − 1 0 1 ≤ k ≤ n − 1 k ≥ n B = k = 1 ∑ ∞ k e − k = ln ( e − 1 e ) Then we note that (we use the fact that k ( n − k ) n ≤ n − 1 n < 2 for 1 ≤ k ≤ n − 1 ) 0 ≤ β n , k ≤ 2 k e − k k ≥ 1 , n ≥ 2 n → ∞ lim β n , k = k e − k k ≥ 1 Thus the Dominated Convergence Theorem tells us that n → ∞ lim k = 1 ∑ n − 1 k 1 ( 1 − n k ) n − 1 = n → ∞ lim k = 1 ∑ ∞ β n , k = k = 1 ∑ ∞ k e − k = B Since 6 e 5 ( e − 1 ) > 1 0 0 0 , we have ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ B − k = 1 ∑ n − 1 k 1 ( 1 − n k ) n − 1 ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ≤ k = 1 ∑ 5 k 1 ∣ ∣ ∣ e − k − ( 1 − n k ) n − 1 ∣ ∣ ∣ + k = 6 ∑ ∞ k e − k ≤ k = 1 ∑ 5 k ( n − k ) n ∣ ∣ ( 1 − n k ) e − k − ( 1 − n k ) n ∣ ∣ + 1 0 − 3 ≤ n 2 k = 1 ∑ 5 k e − k + 2 k = 1 ∑ 5 ∣ ∣ e − k − ( 1 − n k ) n ∣ ∣ + 1 0 − 3 ≤ n 2 k = 1 ∑ 5 k e − k + 2 k = 1 ∑ 5 e − k ∣ ∣ ∣ 1 − e − n k 2 ∣ ∣ ∣ + 1 0 − 3 ≤ n 2 k = 1 ∑ 5 k e − k + 2 k = 1 ∑ 5 e − k × n k 2 + 1 0 − 3 = n 2 k = 1 ∑ 5 k ( k + 1 ) e − k + 1 0 − 3 for all n > 1 0 , using the Mean Value Theorem, from which we deduce that ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ B − k = 1 ∑ n − 1 k 1 ( 1 − n k ) n − 1 ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ≤ 2 × 1 0 − 3 n ≥ 5 5 0 0
Now for the problem itself. We have (note that the k = n terms have to be handled separately) f ( a , n ) = r = a − 1 ∑ 2 a − 1 k = 1 ∑ n n r + 1 k r = n a + 1 + r = a − 1 ∑ 2 a − 1 k = 1 ∑ n − 1 n r + 1 k r = n a + 1 + k = 1 ∑ n − 1 1 − n k n a k a − 1 ( 1 − ( n k ) a + 1 ) = n a + 1 + k = 1 ∑ n − 1 n − k 1 ( ( n k ) a − 1 − ( n k ) 2 a ) and hence f ( n , n ) = n n + 1 + k = 1 ∑ n − 1 n − k 1 ( ( n k ) n − 1 − ( n k ) 2 n ) = n n + 1 + k = 1 ∑ n − 1 k 1 [ ( 1 − n k ) n − 1 − ( 1 − n k ) 2 n ] = n n + 1 + k = 1 ∑ n − 1 k 1 ( 1 − n k ) n − 1 − k = 1 ∑ n − 1 k 1 ( 1 − n k ) 2 n and hence we have shown above that n → ∞ lim f ( n , n ) = 1 + B − A = ln ( 1 + e ) = 1 . 3 1 3 2 6 1 6 8 8 Moreover f ( n , n ) is within 5 × 1 0 − 3 of this limit if n > 5 5 0 0 . Certainly, then f ( 1 0 7 , 1 0 7 ) is equal to 1 . 3 to 1 decimal place. Mathematica evaluates f ( 1 0 7 , 1 0 7 ) as 1 . 3 1 3 2 6 to 5 decimal places.