Good Numbers

Algebra Level 2

Let a natural number n n be good if there exist two distinct non-integral real numbers a a and b b such that a k b k a^k - b^k is an integer for all 1 k n 1 \leq k \leq n .

Find the number of natural numbers which are not good .


The answer is 0.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Ariel Gershon
Mar 2, 2015

Fix n N n \in \mathbb{N} . Let a = 2 n + 1 2 a = 2^n + \frac{1}{2} and b = 1 2 b = \frac{1}{2} , which are distinct non-integral real numbers.

Then, for each 1 k n 1 \le k \le n , we have: a k b k = ( 2 n + 1 2 ) k 1 2 k = i = 0 k ( k i ) 2 n ( k i ) 1 2 i 1 2 k a^k - b^k = \left(2^n + \frac{1}{2}\right)^k - \frac{1}{2^k} = \sum_{i = 0}^{k} \binom{k}{i} 2^{n(k - i)}\frac{1}{2^i} - \frac{1}{2^k} = i = 0 k 1 ( k i ) 2 n ( k i ) i = \sum_{i = 0}^{k-1} \binom{k}{i} 2^{n(k - i)-i} Now in this sum we have i k 1 i \le k - 1 . Hence, n ( k i ) i n k + 1 1 n(k - i)-i \ge n - k + 1 \ge 1 .

Therefore, each exponent is a natural number. Hence each term in that sum is an integer. Hence a k b k a^k - b^k is an integer for all 1 k n 1 \le k \le n .

Hence all natural numbers are good, so the answer is 0 \boxed{0} .

improve more

improve more - 2 years, 9 months ago
Peter Macgregor
Mar 3, 2015

The wording of the question hints that there is a finite number of NOT-GOOD numbers. Let us adopt this as an assumption.

First note that if a number is GOOD then, directly from the definition, every smaller natural number is also good.

So if any number is NOT GOOD, every greater natural number must also be NOT GOOD, and so if there is at least one NOT GOOD number there must be an infinite number of NOT GOOD numbers.

Since this is contrary to our assumption, there cannot be any NOT GOOD numbers.

So the number of NOT GOOD numbers is zero.

But you assumed that there are only finite number of NON-GOOD numbers

Aman Kumar - 2 years, 12 months ago

Log in to reply

Hi Aman,

Yes I did make this assumption. I think it is justified because the question asks us to find 'the number of not-good numbers'. All I am doing is assuming that the question has an answer!

Peter Macgregor - 2 years, 12 months ago

How can you say that if a number is not good then every greater natural number must also not be good?

Writabrata Bhattacharya - 6 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

It's obvious,think a little bit about it...

Nikola Djuric - 5 years, 3 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...