Is it true that the product of the first few consecutive prime numbers plus 1 is always a prime number?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Fortunately we only have to check up to p 6 , as
2 × 3 × 5 × 7 × 1 1 × 1 3 + 1 = 3 0 0 3 1 = 5 9 × 5 0 9 .
In general, for n ≥ 1 , P n = k = 1 ∏ n p k + 1 is not divisible by p k for 1 ≤ k ≤ n , but there is nothing implied about its divisibility by p k > n . The construct P n is used in Euclid's proof that the set of all primes is infinite. As n increases the likelihood that P n is prime will decrease, as the prime gaps keep generally increasing in size, leading to this follow-up question: Is P n prime for a finite or infinite number of n ?