Gravity Velocity, max. height and gravity

A ball is thrown straight up is caught back by the thrower after 6 sec. Calculate

1) The velocity with which the ball was thrown up,

2) The max. height it reaches and

3) The distance travelled by the ball for 2 seconds after it hits the maximum height.

DETAILS AND ASSUMPTIONS :

i) Give the answer in the form, a n s w e r 1 + a n s w e r 2 + a n s w e r 3 answer 1 + answer 2 + answer 3 .

ii) To make the calculations easier take the value of acceleration due to gravity as, g = 10 m / s 2 g = 10 m/s^2


The answer is 95.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Chew-Seong Cheong
Mar 11, 2015
  1. Let the velocity with which the ball was thrown up be v 0 v_0 , then the velocity at time t t after it was thrown was: v ( t ) = v 0 g t v(t) = v_0 - gt . Since the ball took 6 s 6s to came back to the thrower's hand, it took half that time, 3 s 3s , to reached the maximum height when its velocity is zero. v ( 3 ) = v 0 10 ( 3 ) = 0 v 0 = 30 m s 1 \Rightarrow v(3) = v_0 - 10(3) = 0\quad \Rightarrow v_0 = 30ms^{-1} .

  2. Vertical distance on the way up was given by s ( t ) = v 0 t 1 2 g t 2 s(t) = v_0 t - \frac {1}{2} g t^2 . Therefore, the maximum height h = s ( 3 ) = 30 ( 3 ) 1 2 ( 10 ) ( 9 ) = 90 45 = 45 m h = s(3) = 30(3) - \frac {1}{2}(10)(9) = 90 - 45 = 45m .

  3. The distance when the ball was coming down was given by s ( t ) = 0 + 1 2 g t 2 s ( 2 ) = 1 2 ( 10 ) ( 4 ) = 20 m s(t) = 0 + \frac {1}{2} g t^2\quad \Rightarrow s(2) = \frac{1}{2}(10)(4) = 20m .

Then, the required answer is 30 + 45 + 20 = 95 30+45+20 = \boxed{95}

Perfect again! you've done a wonderful job sir!!!

Please don't feel bad, Are you really 57 years old sir???

Sravanth C. - 6 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Of course, Sravanth. And that's the Amazing!!!

Muhammad Arifur Rahman - 6 years, 1 month ago

Yes, I am 57 years old.

Chew-Seong Cheong - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Thanks for replying . . .

Sravanth C. - 6 years, 1 month ago

something is wrong with the question....should use displacement but not distance....question has problem

Zack Yeung - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

yes even i think so .......they should mention whether we take the displacement from bottom or top and acc. to my calculations its 30+45+30 which is 115 instead of 95

roger potter - 5 years, 5 months ago
Anoorag Nayak
Nov 13, 2015

Isn't a similar question is in class 9 NCERT science textbook?

yes .....but the last part {dist. one is wrong.........i think]

roger potter - 5 years, 5 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...