is a real number and satisfies the equation:
.
The sum of all such numbers can be expressed as
, where
and
are relatively prime positive integers. Find
Details and Assumptions
denotes the Greatest Integer Function : , where is the greatest integer less than .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Okay, so it's pretty easy to see that the x − [ x ] on the right hand side is nothing but the fractional part of x , which I'll be writing as { x } . Using this knowledge and evaluating both sides gives:
[ 2 x ] + [ x ] [ 2 x ] [ x ] = 3 3 x − 1 .
Now, the fact that 0 ≤ { x } < 1 gives us something to work with, specifically, something with which we can figure out the bounds for [ x ] ! But for that to work, it makes sense to convert [ 2 x ] into an expression which is in terms of [ x ] . We get:
[ 2 x ] = 2 [ x ] f o r 0 ≤ { x } < 0 . 5 [ 2 x ] = 2 [ x ] + 1 f o r 0 . 5 ≤ { x } < 1 .
And using this in the original re-evaluated equation gives:
2 [ x ] 3 = 3 3 { x } − 1 f o r 0 ≤ { x } < 0 . 5 ( 2 [ x ] + 1 ) ( [ x ] ) 3 [ x ] + 1 = 3 3 { x } − 1 f o r 0 . 5 ≤ { x } < 1 .
Inputting the values of { x } into the equations will give us some quadratic inequalities in [ x ] , which can be easily solved. We can easily rule out the second case ( 0 . 5 ≤ { x } < 1 ), and consider the cases that will arise from the first (which can be solved to get 1 . 8 < [ x ] < 4 . 5 ). These cases are [ x ] = 2 , 3 , 4 . Substituting into the previous equation will give the respective values for { x } , and with just a little bit of algebraic computation, the question is solved!
These are the values of x that you should finally get:
2 1 2 5 , 3 6 1 , 4 2 4 1