Let ζ ( n ) ( s ) be the n th derivative of the Riemann Zeta Function. Find
x → ∞ lim ζ ( x + 1 ) ( 2 ) ζ ( x ) ( 2 ) x
Bonus: Proof that ζ ( x ) ( s ) = O ( ( s − 1 ) x x ! )
Hint: Consider the Taylor Series of ζ ( s ) .
This problem is a continuation of this
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
It is a well-known result that ζ ( n ) ( 2 ) ∼ ( − 1 ) n n ! (for n → ∞ ); the proof is based on Julian's Lemma. It follows that the limit we seek is − 1 .
The quoted result is a special case of ζ ( n ) ( s ) ∼ ( − 1 ) n ( s − 1 ) n + 1 n ! (for ℜ ( s ) > 1 )
Where did you get the results? I want to know more about this.
Log in to reply
Let me try to find a good reference; I'll be back.
Here is a reference, probably not the best. Consider Theorem 4.
Log in to reply
It linked me to Ramanujan's Notebooks Volume 1 page 224. There Ramanujan proved a stronger result using Euler-Maclaurin, a relatively elementary technique as well, that enabled one to approximate ζ ( n ) ( s ) arbitrarily close. The growth rate result stated here comes from the integral of the terms of the summation.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Lemma: For k ∈ Z + , ( − 1 ) k ζ ( k ) ( s ) > 0 .
Proof: ( − 1 ) k ζ ( k ) ( s ) = ( − 1 ) k n = 1 ∑ ∞ n s ( − ln ( n ) ) k = n = 1 ∑ ∞ n s ln ( n ) k . Since all the terms are positive, the sum is positive.
The taylor series of ζ gives:
ζ ( j ) = k = 0 ∑ ∞ k ! 1 ( j − s ) k ζ ( k ) ( s )
This gives
k = 0 ∑ ∞ k ! ( 1 + δ − s ) k ζ ( k ) ( s ) k = 0 ∑ ∞ k ! ( 1 − s ) k ζ ( k ) ( s ) = ζ ( 1 + δ ) , δ > 0 – (1) = δ → 0 + lim k = 0 ∑ ∞ k ! ( 1 + δ − s ) k ζ ( k ) ( s ) = δ → 0 + lim ζ ( 1 + δ ) – (2)
Since ζ ( s ) diverges at s = 1 but converges for all s > 1 , (1) converges while (2) diverges. Let a k = k ! ( 1 + δ − s ) k ζ ( k ) ( s ) and b k = k ! ( 1 − s ) k ζ ( k ) ( s ) . By the lemma, for s > 1 + δ , a k , b k > 0 for k ∈ Z + as all the terms are positive. Hence, (1) is absolutely convergent.
By the Ratio Test,
k → ∞ lim a k a k + 1 ≤ k → ∞ lim ( k + 1 ) ζ ( k ) ( s ) ( 1 + δ − s ) ζ ( k + 1 ) ( s ) ≤ 1 ≤ k → ∞ lim b k b k + 1 1 ≤ k → ∞ lim ( k + 1 ) ζ ( k ) ( s ) ( 1 − s ) ζ ( k + 1 ) ( s )
Limiting δ to 0 + , by Squeeze Theorem,
1 = k → ∞ lim ( k + 1 ) ζ ( k ) ( s ) ( 1 − s ) ζ ( k + 1 ) ( s ) = k → ∞ lim ( 1 − s ) ζ ( k + 1 ) ( s ) ( k + 1 ) ζ ( k ) ( s ) k → ∞ lim ζ ( k + 1 ) ( s ) ζ ( k ) ( s ) = k → ∞ lim k + 1 1 − s = 0 k → ∞ lim ζ ( k + 1 ) ( s ) ζ ( k ) ( s ) k = k → ∞ lim ζ ( k + 1 ) ( s ) ( k + 1 ) ζ ( k ) ( s ) − ζ ( k + 1 ) ( s ) ζ ( k ) ( s ) = 1 − s − 0 = 1 − s
Hence the answer is when s = 2 , 1 − s = − 1 .