⎣ ⎡ r = 1 ∑ 2 0 1 7 ( r 2 0 1 7 ) ( − 1 ) r − 1 H r ⎦ ⎤ − 1 = ?
Notations:
Bonus: How would your answer change if we substitute some arbitrary non-trivial sequence a r for H r ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
You missed out on bonus there.
Log in to reply
Not really. You had already posted a general solution, so instead I posted a different, efficient solution to the initial problem.
Proposition #1: m = 1 ∑ n ⎝ ⎛ k = 1 ∑ m a k ⎠ ⎞ ( m n ) ( − 1 ) m − 1 = m = 0 ∑ n − 1 ( m n − 1 ) a m + 1 ( − 1 ) m
Proof:
LHS can be written as -
( 1 n ) a 1 − ( 2 n ) ( a 1 + a 2 ) + ( 3 n ) a 3 − ⋯ + ( − 1 ) n − 1 ( n n ) ( a 1 + a 2 + ⋯ + a n )
= ( ( 1 n ) − ( 2 n ) + ( 3 n ) − ⋯ + ( − 1 ) n − 1 ( n n ) ) a 1 + ( − ( 2 n ) + ( 3 n ) − ⋯ + ( − 1 ) n − 1 ( n n ) ) a 2 + ⋯ + ( ( − 1 ) n − 1 ( n n ) ) a n
Using the fact that − ( 0 n ) + ( 1 n ) − ( 2 n ) + ( 3 n ) − ⋯ + ( − 1 ) n − 1 ( n n ) = 0 ,
= ( 0 n ) a 1 + ( ( 0 n ) − ( 1 n ) ) a 2 + ⋯ + ( ( 0 n ) − ( 1 n ) + ( 2 n ) − ( 3 n ) + ⋯ + ( − 1 ) n − 1 ( n − 1 n ) ) a n
Proposition #2 : r = 0 ∑ k ( r n ) ( − 1 ) r = ( k n − 1 ) ( − 1 ) k
Proof:
We use induction (since it is very easy to observe using Pascal's triangle addition law).
S ( k = 0 ) : ( 0 n ) = ( 0 n − 1 ) . True
S ( k ) : r = 0 ∑ k ( r n ) ( − 1 ) r = r = 0 ∑ k − 1 ( r n ) ( − 1 ) r + ( k n ) ( − 1 ) k
= ( k − 1 n − 1 ) ( − 1 ) k − 1 + ( k n ) ( − 1 ) k = ( k n − 1 ) ( − 1 ) k . Q.E.D. ■
Coming back to our proof, we use this formula.
= ( 0 n − 1 ) a 1 − ( 1 n − 1 ) a 2 + ⋯ − 1 n − 1 ( n − 1 n − 1 ) a n
= m = 0 ∑ n − 1 ( m n − 1 ) a m + 1 ( − 1 ) m
Q.E.D. ■
Now if we substitute a k = k 1 ,
m = 1 ∑ n ( m n ) H m ( − 1 ) m − 1 = m = 0 ∑ n − 1 ( m n − 1 ) m + 1 ( − 1 ) m = n 1
It can also be done using Binomial Inversion, i.e,
a n = r = 0 ∑ n ( r n ) b r ⟺ b n = r = 0 ∑ n ( − 1 ) n − r ( r n ) a r
I have proved it here .
In general the following property holds (used in Proposition 1) r = a ∑ n k = a ∑ r a r , k = k = a ∑ n r = k ∑ n a r , k
In the end you missed out on a very important part:
= ( 0 n − 1 ) a 1 − ( 1 n − 1 ) a 2 + ⋯ + ( − 1 ) n − 1 ( n − 1 n − 1 ) a n = m = 0 ∑ n − 1 ( m n − 1 ) a m + 1 ( − 1 ) m
It was very surprising for me the fact that
m = 0 ∑ n − 1 ( m n − 1 ) m + 1 1 = n 1
Log in to reply
Oops. I am sorry for the trouble.
Log in to reply
It's fine. How about you give a shot at this problem ?
Is this, in any way, related to the recent Hong Kong TST?
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Using the identity H n = ∫ 0 1 1 − x 1 − x n d x we have r = 1 ∑ N ( r N ) ( − 1 ) r − 1 H r = ∫ 0 1 1 − x 1 r = 1 ∑ N ( r N ) ( − 1 ) r − 1 ( 1 − x r ) d x = ∫ 0 1 1 − x 1 { ( 1 − x ) N − 1 − ( 1 − 1 ) N + 1 } d x = ∫ 0 1 ( 1 − x ) N − 1 d x = N 1 With N = 2 0 1 7 , this makes the answer to the question N = 2 0 1 7 .