We define an "Eleven Hater" as a number that is not a multiple of eleven, but becomes a multiple of
1
1
when any one digit is removed.
For clarity, consider a 3 digit number a b c . if a b c is an "Eleven Hater", then a b , a c , and b c should all be multiples of 1 1 . Note that the order of the digits are not to be altered.
How many 5-digit Eleven Haters are there?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
This is simply beautiful. :)
Let us say that the number is a b c d e ,then we have, a b c d ≡ 0 ( m o d 1 1 ) a b c e ≡ 0 ( m o d 1 1 ) ⟹ a b c d − a b c e ≡ 0 ( m o d 1 1 ) ,expanding the numbers and subtracting we get, d − e ≡ 0 ( m o d 1 1 ) ⟹ = d − e = 1 1 x [ x ∈ n o n − n e g a t i v e i n t e g e r s ] b u t d − e < 1 0 ⟹ d − e = 0 ⟹ d = e .Now,consider, a b c e ≡ 0 ( m o d 1 1 ) a b d e ≡ 0 ( m o d 1 1 ) a b c e − a b d e ≡ 0 ( m o d 1 1 ) .Again,expanding and subtracting we get, 1 0 c − 1 0 e = 1 1 x [ x ∈ n o n − n e g a t i v e i n t e g e r s ] ⟹ x ≡ 0 m o d 1 0 b u t , 1 0 c − 1 0 e < 1 1 0 ⟹ 1 0 c − 1 0 e = 0 ⟹ c = e ,hence c = d = e but, a c c c ≡ 0 m o d 1 1 , h e n c e a = c .So we have that our number is a a a a a ,there a total of 9 such numbers.Cheers!
A slightly easier (but equivalent) approach is to say that
a − b + c − d ≡ a − b + c − e ( m o d 1 1 )
etc, which is why d ≡ e ( m o d 1 1 ) .
By divisibility rule of 11, you can show that the values of a , c , e are interexchangeable. same applies for b , d . Since you have proved that d = e , then you're left with a = b = c = d = e .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
It's a well known fact that the divisibility rule for 11 is to take the alternating sum of the digits of the number, and if that number is divisible by 11 then your original number is divisible by 11.
For example, let n = 6 9 4 1 :
6 − 9 + 4 − 1 = 0 ⟹ 6 9 4 1 ≡ 0 (mod 1 1 )
Let us set n = A B C D E . This gives us the following conditions:
1 1 ∤ A − B + C − D + E
1 1 ∣ A − B + C − D
1 1 ∣ A − B + C − E
1 1 ∣ A − B + D − E
1 1 ∣ A − C + D − E
1 1 ∣ B − C + D − E
What if we added up the bottom 5 conditions? This number should still be divisible by 11.
1 1 ∣ 4 A − 2 B + 2 D − 4 E
Now, take away 2 × ( A − B + D − E )
1 1 ∣ 2 A − 2 E
Now 2 A − 2 E is clearly an even number, and because A and E can only assume values from 0 to 9 , the only number divisible by 1 1 that this expression can assume is 0
2 A − 2 E = 0 ⟹ A = E
Now look back at our other conditions. Allowing A = E , we can simplify many of them.
1 1 ∣ A − B + C − E ⟹ 1 1 ∣ − B + C
1 1 ∣ A − B + D − E ⟹ 1 1 ∣ − B + D
1 1 ∣ A − C + D − E ⟹ 1 1 ∣ − C + D
These sums can only assume values in the interval [ − 9 , 9 ] , meaning that if they are divisible by 1 1 , they must all equal 0 .
− B + C = 0 ⟹ B = C
− B + D = 0 ⟹ B = D
− C + D = 0 ⟹ C = D
Therefore, B = C = D
Analyzing our last condition taking into account our newfound knowledge:
1 1 ∣ B − C + D − E ⟹ 1 1 ∣ B − E ⟹ B = E
This gives us A = B = C = D = E , greatly narrowing our options of 5-digit numbers to choose from. Just to be sure that all of these work, we must refer to our first condition:
1 1 ∤ A − B + C − D + E ⟹ 1 1 ∤ A − A + A − A + A ⟹ 1 1 ∤ A
This condition is satisfied for all A in the interval [ 1 , 9 ] , so we're safe to assume that as long as A = B = C = D = E , we have a solution. Because there are 9 integers in the interval [ 1 , 9 ] , our solution is just that: 9 .