Hatred of Eleven II

We define an "Eleven Hater" as a number that is not a multiple of eleven, but becomes a multiple of 11 11 when any one digit is removed.

For clarity, consider a 3 digit number a b c \overline {abc} . if a b c \overline {abc} is an "Eleven Hater", then a b , a c , \overline {ab}, \overline{ac}, and b c \overline{bc} should all be multiples of 11 11 . Note that the order of the digits are not to be altered.

How many 5-digit Eleven Haters are there?

Image credit: Wikipedia istolethetv


The answer is 9.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Garrett Clarke
Jun 14, 2015

It's a well known fact that the divisibility rule for 11 is to take the alternating sum of the digits of the number, and if that number is divisible by 11 then your original number is divisible by 11.

For example, let n = 6941 n = 6941 :

6 9 + 4 1 = 0 6941 0 6-9+4-1 = 0 \Longrightarrow 6941 \equiv 0 (mod 11 11 )

Let us set n = A B C D E n = \overline{ABCDE} . This gives us the following conditions:

11 A B + C D + E 11\nmid A-B+C-D+E

11 A B + C D 11\mid A-B+C-D

11 A B + C E 11\mid A-B+C-E

11 A B + D E 11\mid A-B+D-E

11 A C + D E 11\mid A-C+D-E

11 B C + D E 11\mid B-C+D-E

What if we added up the bottom 5 conditions? This number should still be divisible by 11.

11 4 A 2 B + 2 D 4 E 11\mid 4A-2B+2D-4E

Now, take away 2 × ( A B + D E ) 2\times(A-B+D-E)

11 2 A 2 E 11\mid 2A-2E

Now 2 A 2 E 2A-2E is clearly an even number, and because A A and E E can only assume values from 0 0 to 9 9 , the only number divisible by 11 11 that this expression can assume is 0 0

2 A 2 E = 0 A = E 2A-2E = 0\Longrightarrow A=E

Now look back at our other conditions. Allowing A = E A=E , we can simplify many of them.

11 A B + C E 11 B + C 11\mid A-B+C-E \Longrightarrow 11\mid -B+C

11 A B + D E 11 B + D 11\mid A-B+D-E \Longrightarrow 11\mid -B+D

11 A C + D E 11 C + D 11\mid A-C+D-E \Longrightarrow 11\mid -C+D

These sums can only assume values in the interval [ 9 , 9 ] [-9,9] , meaning that if they are divisible by 11 11 , they must all equal 0 0 .

B + C = 0 B = C -B+C = 0\Longrightarrow B=C

B + D = 0 B = D -B+D = 0\Longrightarrow B=D

C + D = 0 C = D -C+D = 0\Longrightarrow C=D

Therefore, B = C = D B=C=D

Analyzing our last condition taking into account our newfound knowledge:

11 B C + D E 11 B E B = E 11\mid B-C+D-E\Longrightarrow 11\mid B-E \Longrightarrow B=E

This gives us A = B = C = D = E A=B=C=D=E , greatly narrowing our options of 5-digit numbers to choose from. Just to be sure that all of these work, we must refer to our first condition:

11 A B + C D + E 11 A A + A A + A 11 A 11\nmid A-B+C-D+E \Longrightarrow 11\nmid A-A+A-A+A \Longrightarrow 11\nmid A

This condition is satisfied for all A A in the interval [ 1 , 9 ] [1,9] , so we're safe to assume that as long as A = B = C = D = E A=B=C=D=E , we have a solution. Because there are 9 integers in the interval [ 1 , 9 ] [1,9] , our solution is just that: 9 \boxed{9} .

This is simply beautiful. :)

Delano Might - 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Thank you!

Garrett Clarke - 5 years, 7 months ago
Adarsh Kumar
Jun 13, 2015

Let us say that the number is a b c d e \overline{abcde} ,then we have, a b c d 0 ( m o d 11 ) a b c e 0 ( m o d 11 ) a b c d a b c e 0 ( m o d 11 ) \begin{aligned}\overline{abcd}\equiv 0\pmod{11}\\ \overline{abce}\equiv 0 \pmod{11}\\ \Longrightarrow \overline{abcd}-\overline{abce}\equiv 0 \pmod{11}\end{aligned} ,expanding the numbers and subtracting we get, d e 0 ( m o d 11 ) = d e = 11 x [ x n o n n e g a t i v e i n t e g e r s ] b u t d e < 10 d e = 0 d = e \begin{aligned}d-e\equiv 0 \pmod{11}\\ \Longrightarrow=d-e=11x[x\in {non-negative\ integers}]\\ but\ d-e<10\\ \Longrightarrow d-e=0\\ \Longrightarrow d=e\end{aligned} .Now,consider, a b c e 0 ( m o d 11 ) a b d e 0 ( m o d 11 ) a b c e a b d e 0 ( m o d 11 ) \begin{aligned}\overline{abce}\equiv 0 \pmod{11}\\ \overline{abde}\equiv 0\pmod{11}\\ \overline{abce}-\overline{abde}\equiv 0 \pmod{11}\end{aligned} .Again,expanding and subtracting we get, 10 c 10 e = 11 x [ x n o n n e g a t i v e i n t e g e r s ] x 0 m o d 10 b u t , 10 c 10 e < 110 10 c 10 e = 0 c = e \begin{aligned}10c-10e=11x[x\in {non-negative\ integers}]\\ \Longrightarrow x\equiv 0\mod{10}\\ but,10c-10e<110\\ \Longrightarrow 10c-10e=0\\ \Longrightarrow c=e\end{aligned} ,hence c = d = e c=d=e but, a c c c 0 m o d 11 , h e n c e a = c \overline{accc}\equiv 0 \mod{11},hence\ a=c .So we have that our number is a a a a a aaaaa ,there a total of 9 such numbers.Cheers!

Moderator note:

A slightly easier (but equivalent) approach is to say that

a b + c d a b + c e ( m o d 11 ) a - b + c - d \equiv a - b + c - e \pmod{11}

etc, which is why d e ( m o d 11 ) d \equiv e \pmod{11} .

By divisibility rule of 11, you can show that the values of a , c , e a,c,e are interexchangeable. same applies for b , d b,d . Since you have proved that d = e d=e , then you're left with a = b = c = d = e a=b=c=d=e .

Pi Han Goh - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

Yes,one could do that!

Adarsh Kumar - 6 years ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...