n → ∞ lim tan ⎝ ⎜ ⎛ 8 9 . ( n − 1 ) 9’s 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 … 9 ∘ ⎠ ⎟ ⎞ tan ⎝ ⎛ 8 9 . n 9’s 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 … 9 ∘ ⎠ ⎞ = ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
This was what I used too
I solved it similarly but used the first term of the Taylor series for c o t ( x ) . I let x 1 < x 2 and both be very small values so my limit was n → ∞ lim t a n ( 9 0 − x 2 ) t a n ( 9 0 − x 1 ) = n → ∞ lim c o t ( x 2 ) c o t ( x 1 ) = n → ∞ lim c o t ( 1 0 − ( n − 1 ) ) c o t ( 1 0 − n )
The first terms of the Taylor series for cotangent are c o t ( x ) = x 1 − 3 x − 4 5 x 3 . . . so for very small x the limit becomes: n → ∞ lim 1 0 − n 1 0 − ( n − 1 ) = 1 0 Since the final limit was a ratio of angles, it doesn't matter if we are using radians or degrees.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Use the Trigonometric Co-Function Identities : tan ( x ) = cot ( 9 0 ∘ − x ) . The numerator becomes cot ( ( 1 0 − n ) ∘ ) while the denominator becomes cot ( ( 1 0 − ( n − 1 ) ) ∘ ) . So the limit becomes
n → ∞ lim cot ( ( 1 0 − ( n − 1 ) ) ∘ ) cot ( ( 1 0 − n ) ∘ ) = n → ∞ lim tan ( ( 1 0 − n ) ∘ ) tan ( ( 1 0 − ( n − 1 ) ) ∘ )
Since the angles are small, we convert the angles to radians then let tan ( x ) ≈ x .
tan [ 1 8 0 π ⋅ ( ( 1 0 − n ) ) ] tan [ 1 8 0 π ⋅ ( ( 1 0 − ( n − 1 ) ) ) ] ≈ ( ( 1 0 − n ) ) ( ( 1 0 − ( n − 1 ) ) ) = 1 0