Help provided by Fermat

How many solutions of n n are possible if [ a , b , n ε N ] [a,b,n \: ε \: \mathbb{N}]

a n = ( b + 1 ) n + ( a 1 ) n ? a^{n}=(b+1)^{n}+(a-1)^{n}?

note 0 N 0 \notin \mathbb{N}


The answer is 1.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Joseph Wilson
Jul 12, 2017

Let x = b + 1 x=b+1 and y = a 1 y=a-1 .

a n = x n + y n a^{n}=x^{n}+y^{n}

Now we can use Fermat's Last Theorem to see that n < = 2 n<=2 .

n = 1 , 2 n=1,2 fit the theorem and the definition as a natural number.

Although consider that when n = 1 n=1 , then a = b + 1 + a 1 a=b+1+a-1 .

Rearrange:

a a = b + 1 1 a-a=b+1-1

0 = b 0=b

As b = 0 b=0 (a number not part of the natural numbers), a contradiction occurs when n = 1 n=1 .

Therefore there is only one solution for n n when n = 2 n=2 .

For a complete solution, how do we know there exists a possible solution for n = 2 n = 2 ? If there is, how do we know there is only one solution for n = 2 n = 2 ? Fermat's Last Theorem states that there exists no solutions to the equation x n + y n = z n x^n + y^n = z^n for n > 2 n > 2 . It does not guarantee the existence of a solution for n 2 n \leq 2 . Thus, you need to show that there is a solution for n = 2 n = 2 , and that there is one , unique solution.

Zach Abueg - 3 years, 11 months ago

There are absolutely at least two solutions of the ordered pair (a,b) when n=2. I've found that (5,2) and (313,24) are distinct solutions. All that is required is a Pythagorean triple with its hypotenuse equal to one more than another one of its sides.

Joseph Wilson - 3 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

How did you find these?

Zach Abueg - 3 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

I looked up a list of Pythagorean triples that satisfied the condition. It would be wonderful to see a proof that allows infinite, or limits the amount of solutions when n=2.

Joseph Wilson - 3 years, 11 months ago

Would help if it was clarified whether 0 N 0 \in \mathbb{N} or 0 N 0 \notin \mathbb{N} . In France apparently it is common for 0 0 to be natural, which would make the answer 2 2 :)

Arthur Conmy - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

You're absolutely right! Thank you, I'll change it now.

Joseph Wilson - 3 years, 10 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...