∫ 0 ∞ 2 − e − t t 2 e − 3 t d t
The above integral can be expressed as
A ζ ( B ) − D C + F E lo g G ( H ) − K J π L lo g ( M )
for positive integers A , B , C , D , E , F , G , H , J , K , L and M . And g cd ( C , D ) = g cd ( E , F ) = g cd ( J , K ) = 1 with H and M are square free.
Evaluate A + B + C + D + E + F + G + H + J + K + L + M .
■ This is a part of Hot Integrals
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Hey , i think there is a slight error in the question .. 2 in the numerator?? it should be 4 instead of 2,,!!
Log in to reply
Yes, I was thinking of it. Now that 2 which I got in the denominator makes sense.
@Kartik Sharma Can you please work the integral? I don't see it an easy integration: They are indefinite, and you will get in some place: x ln ( 1 − x ) .
Can please work it out ?? Thanks!
Ya this is lerch function,..
you have to just make it ;)
nyc one :D
Hey your question .. title - "caboodle tricks" ...(something like that ,,)
i want to repost that question in a different way ,,. and i also want to add a link of your question ,.. but i dont know how to add a link
can you tell me .?..
Log in to reply
This is the syntax - [ T i t l e ] ( l i n k )
And yeah, you don't need to write the above in Latex. Brilliant knows how to interpret this.
Or more particularly, [Caboodle of Tricks](https://brilliant.org/problems/iota-eta-tau-epsilon-g-gamma-alpha-tau-iota/?group=Y0XZCTbWJvvU&ref_id=852372)
I too did the same way to get that series. but then i used wolfram to calculate that series. @Kartik Sharma Nice Solution(+1)!!
This is Lerch Transcendent. Its integral representation :
Φ ( z , s , a ) = Γ s 1 0 ∫ ∞ 1 − z e − t t s − 1 e − a t d t
Comparing we get z = 1 / 2 , s = 3 , a = 3
Solve for Φ ( 2 1 , 3 , 3 )
= 7 ζ ( 3 ) − 4 1 7 + 3 4 lo g 3 2 − 3 2 π 2 lo g 2 2
I decided to solve the problem a second time, and it seems that I have encountered an incongruity:
\displaystyle \eqalign{\Phi\left(\frac12,3,3\right)&=\frac1{\Gamma(3)}\int_0^{\infty}\frac{t^{3-1}e^{-3t}}{1-\frac12 e^{-t}} dt\cr &=\int_0^{\infty}\frac{t^2 e^{-3t}}{2-e^{-t}}dt}
This implies that I = 4 Φ ( 2 1 , 3 , 3 ) = 2 8 ζ ( 3 ) − 1 7 + 3 1 6 lo g 3 2 − 3 8 π 2 lo g 2 .
Is there some small detail that I've missed while reworking the problem?
Log in to reply
Sorry for my little mistake i was just got confused with 2 to be put in numerator or denominator
i edited the problem.
For more querries you can report it
4 Should not be there .. check your solution once again please ,..
go step by step ,. first make the function put the value of gamma ,. you will get it..
i got same.
Please can you share some sources to study these functions in detail..it would really helpful
2 1 ∫ 0 ∞ 1 − 2 e − t t 2 e − 3 t d t
= 2 1 r = 0 ∑ ∞ ∫ 0 ∞ 2 r t 2 e − ( r + 3 ) t d t
Here we used the fact that 1 − x 1 = r = 0 ∑ ∞ x r , when − 1 < x < 1
Substituting ( r + 3 ) x = t and using Gamma Function we have:-
2 r = 0 ∑ ∞ ( r + 3 ) 3 2 r + 1 1 = 8 r = 0 ∑ ∞ ( r + 3 ) r + 3 2 r + 3 1 = 8 ( Li 3 ( 2 1 ) − 3 2 1 7 )
Now substituting the value of Li 3 ( 2 1 ) we have our answer as :-
7 ζ ( 3 ) − 4 1 7 + 3 4 ln 3 ( 2 ) − 3 2 π 2 ln ( 2 )
Notation:- Here Li 3 ( ⋅ ) denotes the Trilogarithm function .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Really, I am a fan of you and your problems(especially this Hot Integral series).
This is our problem -
0 ∫ ∞ 2 − e − t 4 t 2 e − 3 t d t
= 2 0 ∫ ∞ 1 − e − t / 2 t 2 e − 3 t d t
Now, we will use this famous series - 1 − x 1 = n = 0 ∑ ∞ x n
And we get,
n = 0 ∑ ∞ 2 n 1 0 ∫ ∞ t 2 e − 3 t e − n t d t
Now, you may call that integral a Laplace transform of t 2 or even Gamma Function and get its value as -
( n + 3 ) 3 2 !
And substituting that in our sum, we get -
2 1 n = 0 ∑ ∞ 2 n ( n + 3 ) 3 1
Well, what's that? Polylogarithm equivalent for Hurwitz zeta function? Yeah, and we have a special name for that(as far as my knowledge says) - Lerch Transcendent . And all the other "nearly same functions" become special cases of this general function. Our answer is equal to Φ ( 2 1 , 3 , 3 ) .
But let's do something different.
Again consider our "basic" series -
1 + x + x 2 + ⋯ = 1 − x 1
Multiplying by x 2 and then integrate both sides,
k = 3 ∑ ∞ k x k = ∫ 1 − x x 2
And similarly doing this, we get,
k = 0 ∑ ∞ ( k + 3 ) 3 x k = x 3 1 ∫ x 1 ∫ x 1 ∫ 1 − x x 2
Now, it's easy to do this integration and we get
7 ζ ( 3 ) − 4 1 7 + 3 4 l o g 3 ( 2 ) − 3 2 π 2 l o g ( 2 )