Hot Integral

Calculus Level 5

If the value of the integral 0 x n 1 x 1 d x = a f ( n ) \displaystyle \int\limits_{0}^{\infty} \frac{x^{n-1}}{x-1} dx = -\frac{a}{f(n)}
where

  1. 0 < n < 1 0<n<1
  2. a a is real
  3. f ( n ) f(n) is a real function of n n
  4. f ( 0.125 ) = c f(0.125) = c .

Find the value of a + ln ( c ) a+\ln(c) .

\blacksquare This is a part of Hot Integrals


The answer is 2.2602.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Hasan Kassim
Jun 17, 2015

Our Integral can be written as:

I = 0 x n 1 x 1 d x = 0 1 x n 1 x 1 d x + 1 + x n 1 x 1 d x \displaystyle I= \int_0^{\infty} \frac{x^{n-1}}{x-1}dx = \int_0^{1^-} \frac{x^{n-1}}{x-1}dx + \int_{1^+}^{\infty} \frac{x^{n-1}}{x-1}dx

Use the substitution x 1 x x\to \frac{1}{x} in the second integral, to get:

I = 0 1 x n 1 1 x d x + 0 1 x n 1 x d x \displaystyle I = - \int_0^{1^-} \frac{x^{n-1}}{1-x}dx + \int_0^{1^-} \frac{x^{-n}}{1-x}dx

Now as long as the integral limits are the same, and bounded between 0 0 and 1 1 , we can rewrite I I as:

I = 0 1 m = 0 ( x m + n 1 x m n ) d x \displaystyle I= - \int_0^{1^-} \sum_{m=0}^{\infty} \bigg( x^{m+n-1} - x^{m-n} \bigg) dx

Integrating:

I = m = 0 ( 1 m + n + 1 m n + 1 ) \displaystyle I = - \sum_{m=0}^{\infty} \bigg( \frac{1}{m+n} + \frac{1}{m-n+1} \bigg)

= m = 1 1 m + ( 1 n ) m = 1 1 m + n 1 n + 1 1 n \displaystyle = \sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{m+(1-n)} - \sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{m+n} - \frac{1}{n} +\frac{1}{1-n}

Now we are going to show that :

m = 1 1 m + ( 1 n ) m = 1 1 m + n = H n H 1 n \displaystyle \sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{m+(1-n)} - \sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{m+n} = H_n - H_{1-n}

Where H k H_k is the k t h k^{th} Harmonic Number, Generalized to the positive non-integral arguments.

Recall that for any real positive x x :

H x = x k = 1 1 k ( k + x ) \displaystyle H_x = x\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k(k+x)}

= k = 1 1 k k = 1 1 k + x \displaystyle = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k} - \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k+x}

Therefore:

H n H 1 n = [ k = 1 1 k k = 1 1 k + n ] [ k = 1 1 k k = 1 1 k + ( 1 n ) ] \displaystyle H_n - H_{1-n} = [\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k} - \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k+n} ] - [\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k} - \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k+(1-n)} ]

= k = 1 1 k + ( 1 n ) k = 1 1 k + n \displaystyle = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k+(1-n)} - \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k+n}

So rewrite I I :

I = H n H 1 n 1 n + 1 1 n \displaystyle I =H_n - H_{1-n} - \frac{1}{n} +\frac{1}{1-n}

P r e p o s i t i o n 1 : \bullet \mathbf{ \; Preposition \; 1 \; : }

For 0 < r < 1 0<r<1 , we have the following Reflection Relation:

H 1 r H r = π cot ( π r ) 1 r + 1 1 r \displaystyle H_{1-r} - H_r = \pi \cot (\pi r ) -\frac{1}{r} +\frac{1}{1-r}

To prove this, we need other prepositions:

P r e p o s i t i o n 2 : \bullet \mathbf{ \; Preposition \; 2 \; : }

For any positive real y y :

0 y H x d x = y γ + ln ( y ! ) \displaystyle \int_0^y H_x dx = y\gamma + \ln (y!)

Where γ \gamma is the Euler-Mascheroni Constant .

P r o o f : \mathbf{ \; Proof \; : }

Start with the definition of the harmonic number, and integrate both sides :

0 y H x d x = 0 y x k = 1 1 k ( k + x ) d x \displaystyle \int_0^y H_x dx = \int_0^y x\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k(k+x)}dx

(just basic integration and evaluation):

= lim i k = 1 i ( y k ln ( y + k ) + ln k ) \displaystyle = \lim_{i\to \infty} \sum_{k=1}^i \bigg( \frac{y}{k} - \ln (y+k) +\ln k \bigg)

= lim i ( y H i ln ( ( y + i ) ! y ! ) + ln i ! ) \displaystyle = \lim_{i\to \infty} ( yH_i - \ln (\frac{(y+i)!}{y!}) + \ln i! )

= lim i ( y H i + ( y ln i + y ln i ) ln ( ( y + i ) ! y ! ) + ln i ! ) \displaystyle = \lim_{i\to \infty} ( yH_i + (- y\ln i + y\ln i) - \ln (\frac{(y+i)!}{y!}) + \ln i! )

= lim i ( y ( H i ln i ) + ln ( i y i ! ( y + i ) ! ) + ln y ! ) \displaystyle = \lim_{i\to \infty} ( y{\color{#20A900}{(H_i - \ln i )}} + {\color{#D61F06}{\ln \Bigg(\frac{i^y i!}{(y+i)!}\Bigg)}} + \ln y! )

Now, Recall the Definition of the Euler-Mascheroni Constant. Then notice that the red term will vanish using Stirling's Formula. So:

0 y H x d x = y γ + ln y ! \displaystyle \boxed{ \int_0^y H_x dx = y\gamma + \ln y! }

P r e p o s i t i o n 3 : \bullet \mathbf{ \; Preposition \; 3 \; : }

For any n > 0 n>0 :

ψ ( n ) = H n 1 n γ \displaystyle \psi (n) = H_{n} - \frac{1}{n} - \gamma

Where : ψ ( n ) \psi (n) is the Digamma Function , and γ \gamma is the Euler-Mascheroni Constant .

P r o o f : \mathbf{ \; Proof \; : }

Using the identity #2 :

0 y H x d x = y γ + ln Γ ( y + 1 ) \displaystyle \int_0^y H_x dx = y\gamma + \ln \Gamma (y+1)

Differentiate w.r.t y y Then Recall the definition of the Digamma function :

H y = γ + ψ ( y + 1 ) \displaystyle H_y = \gamma + \psi (y+1)

Therefore : ( y ( n 1 ) y \to (n-1) )

ψ ( n ) = H n 1 γ = H n 1 n γ \displaystyle \boxed{\psi (n) = H_{n-1} - \gamma = H_{n} - \frac{1}{n} - \gamma}

Now, we can prove our first preposition.

Recall the Well Known Euler's Reflection Formula for the Gamma Function:

Γ ( z ) Γ ( 1 z ) = π csc ( π z ) \displaystyle \Gamma (z) \Gamma (1-z) = \pi \csc (\pi z)

Take the Natural Logarithm of both Sides:

ln Γ ( z ) + ln Γ ( 1 z ) = ln π ln sin ( π z ) \displaystyle \ln \Gamma (z) + \ln \Gamma (1-z) = \ln \pi - \ln \sin (\pi z)

Differentiate Both Sides:

ψ ( z ) ψ ( 1 z ) = π cot ( π z ) \displaystyle \psi (z) - \psi (1-z) = -\pi \cot (\pi z)

Now use the Identity #3 :

H z 1 z H 1 z + 1 1 z = π cot ( π z ) \displaystyle H_z -\frac{1}{z} - H_{1-z} + \frac{1}{1-z} = -\pi \cot (\pi z)

Rearranging, the reflection relation is thus proved:

H 1 r H r = π cot ( π r ) 1 r + 1 1 r \displaystyle \boxed{H_{1-r} - H_r = \pi \cot (\pi r ) -\frac{1}{r} +\frac{1}{1-r} }

Now evaluate this relation back in the equation of I I :

I = π tan ( π n ) \displaystyle \boxed{I = -\frac{\pi}{\tan (\pi n ) } }

The rest work is pretty easy, use tan π 8 = 2 1 \tan \frac{\pi}{8} = \sqrt{2} -1 , and the final answer becomes: π + ln ( 2 1 ) \boxed{ \pi + \ln (\sqrt{2} -1 ) } .

Good my friend ! I have a short solution which i will post after sometime.

Aman Rajput - 5 years, 12 months ago

Log in to reply

Why can't we have a = 2 π a = 2 \pi and c = 2 2 2 c = 2 \sqrt{2} - 2 ?

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 12 months ago

Log in to reply

No i dont think so , while integrating this , one can get 2 π 2\pi in the numerator.

This question can be done via complex integration.

Aman Rajput - 5 years, 12 months ago
Kartik Sharma
Jun 20, 2015

Nice problem, seriously.

0 x n 1 x 1 d x \displaystyle \int_{0}^{\infty}{\frac{{x}^{n-1}}{x-1} dx}

is our problem. Well, I will do it using contour integration.

What we can see? A clear pole at z = 1 \displaystyle z = 1 (we will just change all the x to z since we are in Argand plane now) and there is a branch point as well z = 0 \displaystyle z = 0 . That were the singularities and now we have to play with them.

Consider the contour as a full circle around the origin with a branch cut towards the positive real axis, in short, a "keyhole contour".

So, C = Γ + L 1 + L 2 + γ \displaystyle C = \Gamma + {L}_{1} + {L}_{2} + \gamma

Γ \Gamma represents the "outside" of C with radius M( M \displaystyle M \Rightarrow \infty )

γ \displaystyle \gamma represents the small circle around the origin with radius ϵ ( 0 ) \displaystyle \epsilon(\Rightarrow 0)

L 1 \displaystyle {L}^{1} represents the straight line extending from the small circle over the +ve real axis.

L 2 \displaystyle {L}_{2} represents the straight line extending from the small circle below the +ve real axis.

We can see that

Γ z n 1 z 1 0 \displaystyle \int_{\Gamma}{\frac{{z}^{n-1}}{z-1}} \Rightarrow 0

γ z n 1 z 1 0 \displaystyle \int_{\gamma}{\frac{{z}^{n-1}}{z-1}} \Rightarrow 0

*I am not giving the details of the above integrals but they can easily be seen.

And surely, we'll then evaluate the rest.

We can write z n 1 = e ( n 1 ) l n ( z ) {z}^{n-1} = {e}^{(n-1)ln(z)} . Why did we do that?

L 1 z n 1 z 1 = 0 e ( n 1 ) l n ( z ) z 1 \displaystyle \int_{{L}_{1}}{\frac{{z}^{n-1}}{z-1}} = \int_{0}^{\infty}{\frac{{e}^{(n-1)ln(z)}}{z-1}}

as L 1 \displaystyle {L}_{1} is a straight line.

Similarly,

L 1 z n 1 z 1 = 0 e ( n 1 ) ( l n ( z ( e 2 i π ) ) z 1 \displaystyle \int_{{L}_{1}}{\frac{{z}^{n-1}}{z-1}} = -\int_{0}^{\infty}{\frac{{e}^{(n-1)(ln(z({e}^{2i\pi}))}}{z-1}}

We did that for this. Now, it becomes easy for us to get the answer.

Why did the minus sign come in front? L 2 \displaystyle {L}_{2} is below so, the denominator would change as well.

Why did that e 2 i π \displaystyle {e}^{2i\pi} come? Well, because that is the "phase difference" between the two.

Finally, we know that

C = Γ + L 1 + L 2 + γ \displaystyle C = \Gamma + {L}_{1} + {L}_{2} + \gamma

Hence,

C z n 1 z 1 = ( 1 e 2 ( n 1 ) i π ) ( 0 z n 1 z 1 ) \displaystyle \int_{C}{\frac{{z}^{n-1}}{z-1}} = (1 - {e}^{2(n-1)i\pi})(\int_{0}^{\infty}{\frac{{z}^{n-1}}{z-1}})

Now, the line integral around the curve C can be found using Residue theorem and comes out to be 2 i π e 2 i π ( n 1 ) \displaystyle 2i\pi{e}^{2i\pi(n-1)}

Therefore,

0 z n 1 z 1 = 2 i π e 2 i π ( n 1 ) ( 1 e 2 ( n 1 ) i π ) \displaystyle \int_{0}^{\infty}{\frac{{z}^{n-1}}{z-1}} = \frac{2i\pi{e}^{2i\pi(n-1)}}{(1 - {e}^{2(n-1)i\pi})}

which can be simplified to

= π t a n ( n π ) i π \displaystyle = -\frac{\pi}{tan(n\pi)} - i\pi

Now, I don't how to get rid of that extra i π i\pi and it was the reason of I first reporting it. But still, we can see that we want a real value and consider the first. Help me here!

@Aman Raimann Where am I wrong? I didn't get it. Can you please help?

Kartik Sharma - 5 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

Okay i will check it! and tell you later :)

Aman Rajput - 5 years, 11 months ago

you forgot to take a pole at z=0

Aman Rajput - 5 years, 7 months ago

Good work @Kartik Sharma !

Please Can you tell me how I can learn contour integration? Still I don't know anything about complex analysis.. Can you suggest some books ?

Hasan Kassim - 5 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

Well, I would suggest you to look out for it on Google and there you will find a link to MSE(Math StackExchange). There, you can get a better overview of all the available books. Well, for a beginner(as I'm too), I would suggest to take up some lectures notes of any university(as you like). They are usually a good read and I too learnt from them. Good luck! However, this is not good work since I am not able to get the correct answer, I am getting my answer as a complex number.

Kartik Sharma - 5 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

Ok thanks ! :)

Hasan Kassim - 5 years, 11 months ago

Can u tell me how did u find out line integral . its wrong ! because using residue theorem you have considered the singularity at z=1 which is outside the countour.

Aman Rajput - 5 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

The contour is a circle of infinite radius. I didn't get what you are saying. A branch cut doesn't make the singularity to go out of the "complete contour".

Kartik Sharma - 5 years, 11 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...