Determine all sequences ( x 1 , . . . . , x 2 0 1 1 ) of positive integers such for every positive integer n there is an integer a with
x 1 n + 2 x 2 n + . . . . + 2 0 1 1 x 2 0 1 1 n = a n + 1 + 1 .
Find the sum of all of the entries of all of the sequences.
Note: Suppose the solutions are ( 1 , 2 , 3 . . . , 2 0 1 1 ) and ( 2 , 4 , 6 , 8 , . . . , 4 0 2 2 ) , then your answer will be 1 + 2 + 3 + . . . + 2 0 1 1 + 2 + 4 + 6 + . . . . + 4 0 2 2 = 6 0 6 9 1 9 8
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Suppose x 1 , x 2 , . . , x 2 0 1 1 be a valid sequence.
For every n ,we have some y n such that x 1 n + 2 . x 2 n + . . . + 2 0 1 1 . x n n = y n n + 1 + 1
See that x 1 n + 2 . x 2 n + . . . + 2 0 1 1 . x n n < ( x 1 + 2 . x 2 + . . + 2 0 1 1 . x 2 0 1 1 ) n + 1
So , y n is a bounded sequence.There is some y such that y n = y for infinitely many n
Now,let m be the maximum of x i and write x 1 n + 2 . x 2 n + . . . + 2 0 1 1 . x n n = t m m n + t m − 1 ( m − 1 ) n + . . . + t 1
In fact,for sufficiently large values of n
t m m n + t m − 1 ( m − 1 ) n + . . . + t 1 − y . y n − 1 = 0
Now show that t m = y = m and t 1 = 1 and all other t i are 0.
Hope this procedure helps. :)
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Assume we have such a sequence.Since all numbers of the sequence are fixed, there exist infinitely many primes bigger than the largest member of the sequence.Setting n=p-1, where p is such a prime, we will get that a + 1 is congruent to 1 + 2 + . . . + 2 0 1 1 modulo an infinite number of primes.Thus, a+1 must be equal to that sum.Now we have to prove that if the following is true for every n,
x 1 n + 2 . x 2 n + . . . = 1 n + 2 . a n + 3 . a n + . . .
then (1,a,a,a...,a) is the only solution.(The RHS is just a different way of writing 1 + a n + 1 )
Im stuck here and cannot prove this...