What is the largest possible number of integers n such that for some fixed polynomial f ( x ) of degree 3 with integer coefficients, f ( n ) = n 1 0 0 0 ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Nice solution! Indeed, the integer condition is irrelevant (except for presenting a minor difficulty in constructing an example). However asking the question for the reals would have been a giveaway.
Can you explain Rolle's Theorem? Thanks!
Log in to reply
Between every two zeros of a differentiable function you can find a zero of the derivative.
Consider the polynomial:
f ( x ) = a x 3 + x 2 − a x , a = 3 2 9 9 9 − 2
Clearly f ( 0 ) = 0 , f ( 1 ) = 1 , f ( − 1 ) = 1 and f ( 2 ) = 6 a + 4 = 2 1 0 0 0 . Hence f ( n ) = n 1 0 0 0 at four distinct points: n = − 1 , 0 , 1 , 2 .
On the other hand, suppose there exists a cubic polynomial f ( x ) such that f ( x ) = x 1 0 0 0 at five distinct real values a 1 < a 2 < … < a 5 . Thus, g ( x ) : = x 1 0 0 0 − f ( x ) has roots a i and by Rolle's theorem, for i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , we can find b i satisfying a i < b i < a i + 1 such that the derivative of g disappears.
By the same reasoning, we can find distinct c 1 < c 2 < c 3 at which g ′ ′ ( x ) = 1 0 0 0 ⋅ 9 9 9 x 9 9 8 − f ′ ′ ( x ) disappears. And also d 1 < d 2 at which g ′ ′ ′ ( x ) = 1 0 0 0 ⋅ 9 9 9 ⋅ 9 9 8 x 9 9 7 − f ( 3 ) ( x ) disappears. But f ( 3 ) is constant and x 9 9 7 is a strictly increasing function, so this is impossible.
Interestingly, if we replace n 1 0 0 0 by n 1 0 0 1 , then the answer is five instead of four.
Nice solution, and great observation about 1001!
Really nice solution! I used Lagrange Interpolation to prove that the number of such integers is ≥ 4 , but could not prove that it cannot be greater than 4 . I got this problem correct only because of good luck.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Since 2 1 0 0 0 ≡ 1 modulo 3 , if we define b = 3 1 ( 2 1 0 0 0 − 1 ) then the quadratic polynomial f 0 ( x ) = 1 − b + b x 2 is such that f 0 ( n ) = n 1 0 0 0 for n = − 2 , − 1 , 1 , 2 .
Suppose that f ( x ) was a cubic polnomial with real coefficients such that the equation f ( n ) = n 1 0 0 0 has five or more distinct real roots. Then the polynomial g ( x ) = x 1 0 0 0 − f ( x ) would have at least five distinct real zeros. Rolle's Theorem tells us that g ′ ( x ) would have at least four distinct real zeros, g ′ ′ ( x ) at least three distinct real zeros, and g ′ ′ ′ ( x ) at least two distinct real zeros.
However, if f ( x ) = a x 3 + b x 2 + c x + d , then g ′ ′ ′ ( x ) = 1 0 0 0 × 9 9 9 × 9 9 8 x 9 9 7 − 6 a which (since 9 9 7 is odd) has exactly one real real root.
Thus no cubic polynomial can be found which satisfies the equation f ( n ) = n 1 0 0 0 five or more times, and so 4 is the largest possible number. Whether or not the polynomial f ( x ) has integer coefficients, or whether the values of n are integers, is irrelevant.