How Would You Estimate The Number Of Indian Teenagers

In the population census of 2011 , India reported that she had a population of 1. 210 billion. The median age is 24, and the lower quartile was 12.

Which of the following is a reasonable estimate for the number of teenagers aged 13- 19 in India today?

Details and assumptions

If you are interested in Population statistics, you can look at What Is The Difference Between USA And India .

Image credit: Bollywood News
270 million 120 million 220 million 170 million

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Calvin Lin Staff
Jan 24, 2014

We often think of India as a developing country, and expect that there is a significantly larger group of really young children, which implies that the lower quartile is much less than half of the median. However, given the data that the median age is 24 and the lower quarter is 24 2 = 12 \frac{24}{2} =12 , that hypothesis is now suspect .

Instead, what is likely is that the mode occurs in the range 10-15 (around 12), with fewer children in ages below 10 or above 15. As we are concerned with those aged 13-19, we can still make the reasonable assumption that on average , there are 1210 2 ÷ 25 \frac{1210}{2} \div 25 million in each age group. As such, this gives us 1210 2 × 7 25 170 \frac{ 1210} { 2} \times \frac{7}{25} \approx 170 million.

In fact, India's population structure has began to change in the recent 5-10 years. The following is a graph of age against population size, based on data available from the government census.

Imager Imager

You will notice that there number of young children is on the decline, and that the mode occurs around ages 10-15, like we predicted above.

What do you think is the reason for some of the really long red bars?

This problem is depending on how you estimate; I lost 50 rating because my opinion was different from others.

Bob Yang - 7 years, 4 months ago

My final prediction was a bit over 160 million. Also, shouldn't you have tried to find the amount of people aged 10-16 since the census is from 3 years ago?

Ben Frankel - 7 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

I intentionally made the options have a huge difference, to allow for estimation differences which would arise in questions like this.

That's a valid point. Though it doesn't affect the final answer by too much.

Calvin Lin Staff - 7 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, I wasn't meaning to dispute you when I gave my estimate :)

Ben Frankel - 7 years, 4 months ago

The Really Long Red Bars In the chart suggests Large population group of the same age. Probably a result of large number of Births in those particular years.

Like:

we can see that 31 has got a long bar against it, Which clearly tells that many people are of 31 yrs age, Or many people were born in : 2014 - 31= 1983

Raj Error - 7 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Actually, there was another (related) problem that sought to identify the reason for the really long red bars. The solutions there explained why those bars arose. After all, how can the birth rate vary so regularly and by such a great amount?

Raj Magesh - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

We can see Human Life is becoming more and more easy! So there was a point in Indian History where we could have avoided Population explosion but That point was like an unstable equillibrium! We could not Control Population at that time and It Rolled On! Comforts increasing, medical facilities increasing! and every organism tends to breed when Comforts increase! So there it all started and there's no looking back! The man of equillibrium produced three children(say), all three children on becoming adult Produced 2-3 children and so on! It only rises and does not stop!

Now as we can see there are Really long red Bars, Reasons I feel appropriate for those are: -Some new medical techniques just adopted.

-Immigration.

-Many marraiges occuring in specific years!

-Fertility Rate.

-Rising comforts.

-Rising government subsidies to poor ...and many more...

Raj Error - 7 years, 1 month ago

BTW Indian Kids Are not all Fatsos, Calvin Lin!! :D

Sam Hansfield - 7 years, 4 months ago
Julio Reyes
Feb 10, 2014

You are given Total Population = 1.210 billion.

The median tells you the value at which half the population is larger and half is smaller. This means half the population is under or aged 24. So approximately 605 million are 0 - 24 years old.

1.210 2 = . 605 billion = 605 million {1.210 \over 2} = .605 \text{ billion} = 605 \text{ million}

The lower quartile tells you the value at which half of the lower half of the total population is larger and half is smaller. In other words, its sort of like the median of the lower half of the total population. This means approximately 302.5 million are aged 12 - 24.

605 2 = 302.5 million {605 \over 2} = 302.5 \text{ million}

We want to find the part of that 302.5 million that are aged 13 -19. Since this is an estimate, we can assume there is an equal proportion of people in each age group. For our purposes, there are 12 age groups, since only half of the people in the age group 12 or 24 are within our 302.5 million. This means approximately 25.2 million are in each age group.

302.5 2 25.2 million {302.5 \over 2} \approx 25.2 \text{ million}

We are interested in the age groups 13-19, which there is 7 group. So we can just multiply 25.2 by 7 to get the total estimated population that are 13-19 years old. We get approximately 176.4 million aged 13-19.

25.2 7 = 176.4 million 25.2 \cdot 7 = 176.4 \text{ million}

Our closest option is 170 million, so that is our answer.

Very gud

u hav given a splendid answer as many like me don't even know the meaning of quartile

SHIVAM RAI - 7 years, 3 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...