Determine the value of the limit below:
n → ∞ lim n ( n 2 n )
Answer 666 if you think that the limit doesn't exist.
Notation: ( N M ) = N ! ( M − N ) ! M ! denotes the binomial coefficient .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
There's a much simpler approach. The reason why this works out is because each time we are multiplying by "close to 4".
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin sir can you please point out that simpler approach ?
Log in to reply
I've added it below. It simply rigorizes the notion of "multiplying by close to 4", so you should have a think about how to do that, before reading further.
Let
a
n
=
(
n
2
n
)
.
We have the recurrence relation
a
n
=
n
×
n
2
n
×
(
2
n
−
1
)
×
a
n
−
1
=
(
4
−
n
2
)
×
a
n
. Because each time we are "multiplying by close to 4", it makes sense that the final limit will be 4. Let's rigorize this idea.
Let b n = lo g a n . The expression in the problem is equivalent to
n → ∞ lim n ( n 2 n ) = e lim n 1 b n .
From the recurrence relation,
b
n
=
ln
(
4
−
n
2
)
+
b
n
−
1
.
Recall that (you should know / be able to prove that) if
lim
c
n
=
C
, then
lim
n
1
∑
i
=
1
n
c
i
=
C
.
Hence, since
lim
ln
(
4
−
n
2
)
=
ln
4
, it follows that
lim
n
1
b
n
=
ln
4
.
Thus, the limit in the question is equal to e ln 4 = 4 .
Hint: use Stirling's approximation for factorials.
for n → + ∞
n ! = 2 π n ( e n ) n
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Solution as suggested by @Yuri Lombardo :
L = n → ∞ lim n ( n 2 n ) = n → ∞ lim n ( n ! ) 2 ( 2 n ) ! = n → ∞ lim n 2 π n ( e n ) 2 n 4 π n ( e 2 n ) 2 n = n → ∞ lim n π n 2 2 n = n → ∞ lim 4 ( π n ) − 2 n 1 = n → ∞ lim 4 exp ( ln ( π n ) − 2 n 1 ) = n → ∞ lim 4 exp ( − 2 n ln ( π n ) ) = n → ∞ lim 4 exp ( − 2 n 1 ) = 4 e 0 = 4 By Stirling’s formula: n ! ∼ 2 π n ( e n ) n exp ( x ) = e x A ∞ / ∞ case, L’H o ˆ pital’s rule applies. Differentiate up and down w.r.t. x
Reference: L'Hôpital's rule
Alternative solution
L = n → ∞ lim n ( n 2 n ) = n → ∞ lim n ( n ! ) 2 ( 2 n ) ! = n → ∞ lim exp ( n 1 ln ( ( n ! ) 2 ( 2 n ) ! ) ) = n → ∞ lim exp ( n 1 ( k = 1 ∑ 2 n ln k − 2 k = 1 ∑ n ln k ) ) = n → ∞ lim exp ( n 1 ( k = n + 1 ∑ 2 n ln k − k = 1 ∑ n ln k ) ) = n → ∞ lim exp ( n 1 ( k = n + 1 ∑ 2 n ( ln k − ln n ) − k = 1 ∑ n ( ln k − ln n ) ) ) = n → ∞ lim exp ( n 1 ( k = n + 1 ∑ 2 n ln n k − k = 1 ∑ n ln n k ) ) = n → ∞ lim exp ( ∫ 1 2 ln x d x − ∫ 0 1 ln x d x ) = n → ∞ lim exp ( [ x ln x − 1 ] 1 2 − [ x ln x − 1 ] 0 1 ) = n → ∞ lim exp ( 2 ln 2 − ln 1 − ln 1 + x → 0 lim x ln x ) = n → ∞ lim exp ( 2 ln 2 − 0 − 0 + 0 ) = e ln 4 = 4 By Riemann sums By L’H o ˆ pital’s rule
Reference: Riemann sums