2 1 × 3 2 × 4 3 × 5 4 × 6 5 × 7 6 × ⋯ = ? David was given the above infinite product as his class assignment by his teacher, Daniel. He found difficult to answer this problem. To make him clear about it , Daniel arranged the product as 1 1 × 2 2 × 3 3 × 4 4 × 5 5 × 6 6 × 7 7 × ⋯ = ? At once he answered 1 . Is the rearrangement by Daniel correct?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Yes, it is but the theme of the problem about the arrangement of the terms in product above.
If you keep on crossing out the terms in the first series, you will eventually get 1 × ∞ 1 , which would be 0.
Yes, it is but the theme of the problem about the arrangement of the terms in product above.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
We can rewrite the given product as 2 1 × 3 2 × 4 3 × ⋯ = i = 1 ∏ ∞ i + 1 i By definition, i = 1 ∏ ∞ i + 1 i = n → ∞ lim i = 1 ∏ n i + 1 i = n → ∞ lim n 1 = 0 So the answer 1 is incorrect .
The rearrangement must also, therefore, be incorrect (since the product would, indeed, be 1 after rearranging). In general, you can't rearrange the denominators of an infinite product of fractions.