I challenge you to bash this

Geometry Level 5

Inside A B C \triangle ABC lies a point P P satisfying C A P = 1 5 \angle CAP=15^{\circ} . Let Q Q be another point inside the triangle such that Q C B = A C P , Q B C = A B P \angle QCB=\angle ACP,\angle QBC=\angle ABP . Suppose the circumcenter of A B C ABC lies on Q P QP and A = 5 5 \angle A=55^{\circ} , find P C B + Q B C \angle PCB+\angle QBC in degrees.


The answer is 75.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Xuming Liang
Aug 10, 2015

For those who have yet to study advanced Euclidean geometry, Q Q is called the isogonal conjugate of P P with respect to A B C ABC ; it also satisfies B A Q = C A P = 1 5 \angle BAQ=\angle CAP=15^{\circ} . The locus of points P P such that P Q PQ intersects a fixed point is an interesting topic of study in modern Euclidean geometry. In particular, I have written a paper(a collaberation) on a ratio perserving property this locus possesses. Anyway, the fixed point that P Q PQ crosses in this problem is the circumcenter, and I will prove below that such P P satisfies C A P + P C B + A B P = 9 0 \angle CAP+\angle PCB+\angle ABP=90^{\circ} . Since Q B C = A B P \angle QBC=\angle ABP , the answer to this question is 90 15 = 7 5 90-15=\boxed {75^{\circ}} . (As one can see, the value of A \angle A here is irrelevant, I added it in case bashers want to give it a go.)

Before attempting to prove C A P + P C B + A B P = 9 0 \angle CAP+\angle PCB+\angle ABP=90^{\circ} , I shall mention a few general properties about isogonal conjugates(try to prove these on your own):

First, the pedal triangles of P , Q P,Q with respect to A B C ABC (triangle formed by projecting the points onto the side of A B C ABC ) share the same circumcircle; the circumcenter clearly lies on the midpoint of Q P QP .

Next, let D E F DEF denote P P 's pedal triangle( D , E , F D,E,F lie on B C , A C , A B BC,AC,AB respectively), Q Q' is the isogonal conjugate of P P with respect to D E F DEF . Then P Q Q O PQ\parallel QO .

Finally, let L M N LMN denote of circumcevian triangle of P P (triangle form of the intesection of A P , B P , C P AP,BP,CP with the circumcircle of A B C ABC . i.e. L = A P A B C L=AP\cap \odot ABC and similarly for M , N M,N ). Then D E F L M N \triangle DEF\sim \triangle LMN . Moreover, Q , P Q',P are corresponding points in the two similar triangles respectively.

With these general properties about P , Q P,Q in mind, we now look at what happens with O O lying on P Q PQ . From the second property, we immediately deduce that Q Q' lies on P Q PQ . Let O O' denote the circumcenter of D E F DEF , which lies on P Q PQ from the first property. By the third property, we know that Q O , P O Q'O', PO are corresponding elements in the two similar triangles D E F , L M N DEF, LMN . Since they are parallel(they all lie on the same line), we can deduce that the triangles D E F , L M N DEF, LMN are homothetic. Again, we have established that the pedal and cevian triangle of P P are homothetic, a property that is only true with O O lies on P Q PQ . We are now ready to prove our angle equality(just angle chasing from now on)

It is a general fact about isogonals that F E A Q FE\perp AQ (easy to prove, like the ones above), since we've proven M N E F MN\parallel EF , therefore M N A Q MN\perp AQ 9 0 = N A Q + A N M = B A Q + B A N + A B P = C A P + P C B + A B P \implies 90^{\circ}=\angle NAQ+\angle ANM=\angle BAQ+\angle BAN+\angle ABP=\angle CAP+\angle PCB+\angle ABP . We are done.

Feel free to ask me anything about isogonal conjugates.

Moderator note:

Great solution motivated by the isogonal construction of points P and Q

Thanks for adding the image!

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 10 months ago

Woah , what a coincidence! I learnt about isogonal conjugates today and I saw this problem today , and I was able to solve it! Xuming , please post more such problems. I like them a lot! :)

Nihar Mahajan - 5 years, 9 months ago

Is there any more simple solution, or atleast methods using lower level geometry?

Subhiksha ND - 5 years, 9 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...