Glaciers Melting in a Teacup

Suppose you have a glass of water that contains an ice cube. What happens to the water level in the glass when the ice melts?

Rises significantly Stays the same Falls significantly

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

5 solutions

Discussions for this problem are now closed

Keith de Souza
Apr 16, 2015

Archimedes' Principles:

Any floating object displaces a volume of water equal in weight to the object's MASS.
Any submerged object displaces a volume of water equal to the object's VOLUME.

Formula

Mass / Density = Volume Melting ice cube

If you place water and an ice cube in a cup so that the cup is entirely full to the brim, what happens to the level of water as the ice melts? Does it rise, stay the same, or lower?

The ice cube is floating, so based on Archimedes' Principle 1 above, we know that the volume of water being displaced (moved out of the way) is equal in mass (weight) to the mass of the ice cube. So, if the ice cube has a mass of 10 grams, then the mass of the water it has displaced will be 10 grams.

We know the density of the ice cube is less than that of the liquid water, otherwise it wouldn't be floating. Water is one of the very few solids that is less dense than when in its liquid form. If you take a one pound bottle of water and freeze it, it will still weigh one pound, but the molecules will have spread apart a bit and it will be less dense and take up more volume or space. This is why water bottles expand in the freezer. It's similar to a Jenga tower. When you start playing it contains a fixed number of blocks, but as you pull out blocks and place them on top, the tower becomes bigger, yet it still has the same mass/weight and number of blocks.

Fresh, liquid water has a density of 1 gram per cubic centimeter (1g = 1cm 3 ^3 , every cubic centimeter liquid water will weigh 1 gram). By the formula above (Mass / Density = Volume) and basic logic, we know that 10 grams of liquid water would take up 10 cubic cm of volume (10g / 1g/cm 3 ^3 = 10cm 3 ^3 ).

So let's say that our 10 gram ice cube has a density of only .92 grams per cubic centimeter. By the formula above, 10 grams of mass that has a density of .92 grams per cubic centimeter will take up about 10.9 cubic centimeters of space (10g / .92g/cm 3 ^3 = 10.9cm 3 ^3 ). Again, the volume of 10 grams of frozen water is more than the volume of 10 grams of its liquid counterpart.

The floating ice cube has a mass of 10 grams, so based on Archimedes' Principle 1, it is displacing 10 grams of water (which has 10cm 3 ^3 of volume). You can't squeeze a 10.9cm 3 ^3 ice cube into a 10cm 3 ^3 space, so the rest of the ice cube (about 9% of it) will be floating above the water line.

So what happens when the ice cube melts? The ice shrinks (decreases volume) and becomes more dense. The ice density will increase from .92g/cm 3 ^3 to that of liquid water (1g/cm 3 ^3 ). Note that the weight will not (and cannot) change. The mass just becomes more dense and smaller - similar to putting blocks back into their original positions in our Jenga tower. We know the ice cube weighed 10 grams initially, and we know it's density (1g/cm 3 ^3 ), so let's apply the formula to determine how much volume the melted ice cube takes. The answer is 10 cubic centimeters (10g / 1g/cm 3 ^3 = 10cm 3 ^3 ), which is exactly the same volume as the water that was initially displaced by the ice cube.

In short, the water level will not change as the ice cube melts.

Reference

Sorry this is wrong, the ice cubes are submerged so displace there own volume of water!! When the ice cubes melt the resulting water displaces it's volume. However this volume is smaller as ice is less dense than water because of its chemical make up, it forms a lattice, so ice displaces more water so the level will drop.

Jamie MacEwen - 5 years, 6 months ago

And most ice has trapped air within it, making the ice take up even more volume than its water content

David Epstein - 5 years, 3 months ago

@Keith de Souza , we really liked your comment, and have converted it into a solution. If you subscribe to this solution, you will receive notifications about future comments.

Brilliant Mathematics Staff - 6 years, 1 month ago

pls take into consideration @Dan Trivates answer. It's a physics test, not algebra

George Athanasiades - 5 years, 7 months ago

I believe this doesn't take into account the ice cubes in the glass that are forced under the surface. Water expands as it becomes ice, so this principle only works if every piece of ice is given enough space to float independently. Otherwise the water level will lower slightly. Or am I mistaken?

David Skulavik - 5 years, 6 months ago

How are they 'forced under' the water? I think there is not much water in the glass, so it is nearly as cold as ice itself, therefore only a very small part of the floating ice is above the water level. If there was just one ice cube, the water would be warmer and therefore more of the ice would be above the surface

John Hextall - 5 years, 6 months ago

In that case the ocean water levels will not increase in the next century? So suspicious ¬¬"

Hideo Chiba - 5 years, 6 months ago

That's not quite right. The oceans are fundamentally different because much of the glacial mass is resting on top of land, not floating in the water.

Josh Silverman Staff - 4 years, 11 months ago

alright, BUT when you put ice cubes on the glass of water, a certain percentage of the cube is above the line of water because it flotes. There for, when it all melts, and the ice becomes water, the water line has to be a little above the line you initially​ started with

Cláudio Fernandes - 5 years, 6 months ago

The ice (including above the water) line has a lower density, obviously. So when it melts, the volume above the water line was of a lower density, once melted, it had a higher density (same mass, but LESS volume) so it won't take up as much space.

Bruce Jackson - 5 years, 6 months ago
Josh Silverman Staff
Dec 6, 2014

The buoyant force felt by the floating ice is given by the weight of the water that is is displacing, i.e. the volume of the ice that is below the water line, times the density of water, times the gravitational field:

F buoyant = V b ρ w g F_\text{buoyant} = V_b \rho_w g

This buoyant force is balanced by gravity. The strength of the gravitational force is the mass of the ice times the gravitational field. The mass of the ice is the total volume of the ice times the density of ice:

F gravity = M ice g = ρ ice V tot g F_\text{gravity} = M_\text{ice} g = \rho_\text{ice} V_\text{tot} g

Because these forces balance ( F gravity = F buoyant F_\text{gravity} = F_\text{buoyant} ), we have

V b ρ w g = ρ ice V tot g V_b \rho_w g = \rho_\text{ice} V_\text{tot} g

or V b / V tot = ρ ice / ρ w V_b / V_\text{tot} = \rho_\text{ice} / \rho_w .

In other words, the fraction of the ice that is below the water is V b / V tot = ρ ice / ρ w V_b / V_\text{tot} = \rho_\text{ice} / \rho_w .

Now, what is the fraction of the ice that is above the water? It's 1 V b / V tot = 1 ρ ice / ρ w 1 - V_b / V_\text{tot} = 1 - \rho_\text{ice} / \rho_w .

Therefore, the volume of the ice that's above the water is V tot ( 1 ρ ice / ρ w ) V_\text{tot} (1 - \rho_\text{ice} / \rho_w) .

The original question we were interested in is whether when the ice melts, it will raise the water level in the glass. What I will show now is that the reduction in volume of the ice is exactly equal to the volume of ice that was above the water line.

What is the reduction in volume of the ice cube when it melts? Before it melts, it is equal to V tot = M ice / ρ ice V_\text{tot} = M_\text{ice} / \rho_\text{ice} . After it melts it is equal to M ice / ρ w M_\text{ice}/\rho_w .

The difference is

M ice / ρ ice M ice / ρ w = M ice ( 1 ρ ice 1 ρ w ) = M ice ρ ice ( 1 ρ w / ρ ice ) = V tot ( 1 ρ w ρ ice ) \begin{aligned} M_\text{ice} / \rho_\text{ice} - M_\text{ice}/\rho_w &= M_\text{ice}\left(\frac{1}{\rho_\text{ice}} - \frac{1}{\rho_w}\right) \\ &= \frac{M_\text{ice}}{\rho_\text{ice}} \left(1-\rho_w / \rho_\text{ice}\right) \\ &= V_\text{tot} \left(1-\frac{\rho_w }{ \rho_\text{ice}}\right) \end{aligned}

If you compare this to the portion of the ice that was above the water line before it melted, the two quantities are exactly the same!

This means that the reduction in volume of the ice when it melts is equal to the volume of the ice that floated above the water level. The ice simply becomes water that occupies the same volume below the water line that it did to begin with.

Great answer!

Prasit Sarapee - 5 years, 6 months ago

the mass of water displaced by ice is equal to mass of ice ( mass of fraction of ice ) immersed in water... according to relative density... only 90 percent of ice is immersed in water... after it melts .. complete 100 percent mass is added.... so the level of water must actually rise

Rudra Sanjeev - 5 years, 7 months ago

what about the volume, it decreases when ice melts.

Ryuuki Ando - 5 years, 7 months ago

Yes u r right Level should drop

Hassan Sohail - 5 years, 6 months ago

You are not quite right. The mass of the displaced water (times gravity acceleration) is the same as the buoyant force that acts on the submerged body. That force is holding the ice in the balance so it has to counteract the gravity force on the whole ice block which means that the mass of the ice corresponds to the mass of the displaced water - this holds for free floating ice blocks. If we add more ice blocks underneath the original ice block - this won't change this conclusion - the underlying ice blocks will push the first ice block more to the surface until the same equilibrium is achieved.

Alija Bevrnja - 5 years, 6 months ago
Achille 'Gilles'
Nov 21, 2015

The easiest way to explain the answer is to do the reverse experiment.

Put water in a glass (leaving some room at the top) and place it in a freezer. As the water freezes, the increase in volume will push some of the ice above the water's surface.

Now if you let this ice melt, the glass will go back to its original level and as it melts you will notice that the water level is always the same as the original level.

Rohit Jain
Mar 30, 2014

The ice cube is floating, so based on Archimedes' Principle 1 above, we know that the volume of water being displaced (moved out of the way) is equal in mass (weight) to the mass of the ice cube. So, if the ice cube has a mass of 10 grams, then the mass of the water it has displaced will be 10 grams. In short, the water level will not change as the ice cube melts

Alija Bevrnja
Nov 22, 2015

NICE, EASY SOLUTION (not too short though - for sake of better explanation)

PRINCIPLE: The weight of a floating body is equal to the weight of the displaced water (by weight we mean if we placed it on the scales).

CLARIFICATION: The displaced water is the water that would occupy the volume currently occupied by the submerged part of the body - it is SOMEWHAT abstract thing. It is NOT the water that has moved during the process of submerging a part of the floating body (see figure above).

EXPLANATION: If we (mentally) compress the floating body (no matter if it is ice or not) into the shape of its submerged part (green + yellow), maintaining uniform density:

  • its mass stays the same (so does the gravitational force) and

  • the buoyancy force upon it stays the same (no changes are made to the boundary of the water and body - as if the water "does not know" we changed the body at all).

Therefore, the body will remain in equilibrium. It will levitate (completely submerged, but not sinking). Note that such a body must now have the same AVERAGE density as the water itself:

  • If it was denser - it would sink or

  • If it was thinner - it would float to the surface,

but we know that it is impossible, since we know we have retained the equilibrium.

NOTE: We required UNIFORM DENSITY (during mental compression) to avoid the toppling of the body and leaving this geometrical configuration.

FURTHER EXPLANATION: For the case of ice, we do the same procedure. At the end, it will have the same density as the water and melting will not change anything - therefore, the level remains the same as when the ice was floating. (I know that you can not compress the ice like that - but we are not interested in the intermediate steps but only at the initial and the final states because we know that the way in which we melt the ice should not affect whether the water level will rise or lower).

ADDENDUM: There is no difference for this case if there is a SINGLE floating block of ice or MANY of them. We can treat all the ice cubes as one body (system) and we would again have only two external forces: gravity and buoyancy. (The completely submerged ice blocks will feel greater buoyancy than their "dry weight" and will push against the upper blocks until equilibrium is reached, i.e. until the upper blocks rise and the buoyant force upon them reduces).

DISCLAIMER: We are assuming the near freezing water and melting ice, so everything at the freezing point of water.

DISCLAIMER 2: This solution holds if there are no other forces on the ice except buoyancy and gravity, e.g. the bottom of the glass is not supporting the ice column - which can easily happen if we try stacking too many ice blocks (this is not the only way for having an ice column - inclined sides of the glass could also do this etc.).

Alija Bevrnja - 5 years, 6 months ago

...

INTERESTING FACT: The meltdown of the floating icebergs does not contribute to the global water level rise :D

Alija Bevrnja - 5 years, 6 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...