Illumination

Calculus Level 3

Two spheres of radii 2 2 and 8 8 have their centers separated by a distance of 18. 18.

If a π a\pi is the largest surface area that can be illuminated by a light source placed somewhere on the line joining their centers, what is a ? a?


The answer is 64.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Zico Quintina
Mar 20, 2018

The part of a sphere illuminated by an external light source is a spherical cap (or spherical dome ); there are several formulas for the area of a spherical dome, the one we shall be using is A = 2 π r 2 ( 1 cos θ ) A=2\pi r^2 (1-\cos\theta) , where θ \theta is the angle between the radius to the top of the cap and a radius to the edge of the cap.

We call the distance from the light source to the centre of the smaller sphere α \alpha ; then the distance from the light source to the larger sphere is 18 α 18-\alpha .

From the diagram above, we see that cos θ 1 = 2 α \cos\theta_{1} = \dfrac{2}{\alpha} and that cos θ 2 = 8 18 α \cos\theta_{2} = \dfrac{8}{18-\alpha} .

Then, using the formula mentioned above, we have that the combined illuminated area is

A = 2 π r 1 2 ( 1 cos θ 1 ) + 2 π r 2 2 ( 1 cos θ 2 ) = 8 π ( 1 2 α ) + 128 π ( 1 8 18 α ) = 8 π [ 17 2 α + 128 α 18 ] \begin{aligned}A&=2\pi r_{1}^2 \left(1-\cos\theta_{1}\right)+2\pi r_{2}^2 \left(1-\cos\theta_{2}\right)\\ &=8\pi \left(1-\dfrac{2}{\alpha}\right)+128\pi \left(1-\dfrac{8}{18-\alpha}\right)\\ &=8\pi \left[17-\dfrac{2}{\alpha}+\dfrac{128}{\alpha-18} \right]\end{aligned}

Then setting the derivative equal to zero we get

d A d α = 8 π [ 2 α 2 128 ( α 18 ) 2 ] = 0 \dfrac{dA}{d\alpha}=8\pi \left[\dfrac{2}{\alpha^2}-\dfrac{128}{(\alpha-18)^2}\right]=0

Dividing by 16 π 16\pi and simplifying gives us

1 α 2 = 64 ( α 18 ) 2 64 α 2 = ( α 18 ) 2 8 α = ± ( α 18 ) α = 18 7 , 2 \begin{aligned}\dfrac{1}{\alpha^2} &= \dfrac{64}{(\alpha-18)^2}\\ 64\alpha^2 &= (\alpha-18)^2\\ 8\alpha &= \pm(\alpha-18)\\ \alpha &= \dfrac{-18}{7}, 2 \end{aligned}

Since α \alpha must be positive, we discard the first solution. Using α = 2 \alpha=2 , we get

A = 8 π [ 17 2 α + 128 α 18 ] = 8 π [ 17 2 2 128 16 ] = 64 π \begin{aligned}A&=8\pi \left[17-\dfrac{2}{\alpha}+\dfrac{128}{\alpha-18} \right]\\ &=8\pi \left[17-\dfrac{2}{2}-\dfrac{128}{16} \right]\\ &=64\pi\end{aligned}

Thus the required value of a is 64 . a \text{ is } \boxed{64}.

Simple and beautiful :)

Roberto Gomide - 3 years, 2 months ago

Another way to maximize the area without derivatives is using the arithmetic-harmonic inequality.

In fact, there exist variables x 1 x_1 , x 2 x_2 and weights w 1 w_1 , w 2 w_2 such that

r 1 2 + r 2 2 A / ( 2 π ) = r 1 2 cos θ 1 + r 2 2 cos θ 2 w 1 x 1 + w 2 x 2 r_1^2+r_2^2 - A/(2\pi) = r_1^2 \cos\theta_1 + r_2^2 \cos\theta_2 \equiv w_1x_1 + w_2x_2 is proportional to the weighted arithmetic mean of x 1 x_1 , x 2 x_2 and

d = r 1 / cos θ 1 + r 2 / cos θ 2 w 1 / x 1 + w 2 / x 2 d = r_1/\cos\theta_1 + r_2/\cos\theta_2 \equiv w_1/x_1 + w_2/x_2 is proportional to their weighted harmonic mean.

It is enough to set w k = r k 3 / 2 w_k = r_k^{3/2} and x k = r k 1 / 2 cos θ k x_k = r_k^{1/2} \cos\theta_k , k { 1 , 2 } k \in \{1,2\} .

For fixed d , r 1 2 + r 2 2 A / ( 2 π ) r_1^2+r_2^2 - A/(2\pi) will be minimum (thus A maximum) when x 1 = x 2 x ˉ x_1 = x_2 \equiv \bar x . Substituting into the second equation yields x ˉ = ( w 1 + w 2 ) / d = ( r 1 3 / 2 + r 2 3 / 2 ) / d \bar x = (w_1+w_2)/d = (r_1^{3/2}+r_2^{3/2}) / d

and finally A = 2 π [ r 1 2 + r 2 2 ( r 1 3 / 2 + r 2 3 / 2 ) 2 / d ] = 2 π [ 4 + 64 ( 2 2 + 8 8 ) 2 / 18 ] = 64 π A = 2\pi \left[ r_1^2 + r_2^2 - \left(r_1^{3/2}+r_2^{3/2}\right)^2 / d \right] = 2\pi \left[ 4 + 64 - \left(2\sqrt 2 + 8 \sqrt 8\right)^2 / 18 \right] = 64\pi .

Sorry for being so compact but I don't know how to submit solutions, so I had to squeeze it all inside a comment.

Giacomo Lanza - 2 years, 8 months ago
Joseph Newton
Mar 9, 2018

To represent the two spheres, we will consider the equations of two semicircles, one of radius 2 at (0,0) and one of radius 8 at (18,0).

These will have equations y = 4 x 2 y=\sqrt{4-x^2} and y = 64 ( x 18 ) 2 y=\sqrt{64-(x-18)^2} respectively.

Now consider 2 x coordinates a and b, each lying within one of the semicircles, and a tangent is drawn from the edge of the circle at x=a or x=b to the x axis: We can find the derivative of the equations of the semicircles to get the gradient of this tangent, and subsequently find the equation of the tangents: y = 4 x 2 y = 64 ( x 18 ) 2 y = x 4 x 2 y = ( x 18 ) 64 ( x 18 ) 2 y ( a ) = a 4 a 2 y ( b ) = ( b 18 ) 64 ( b 18 ) 2 \begin{aligned}y&=\sqrt{4-x^2}&y&=\sqrt{64-(x-18)^2}\\ y'&=\frac{-x}{\sqrt{4-x^2}}&y'&=\frac{-(x-18)}{\sqrt{64-(x-18)^2}}\\ y'(a)&=\frac{-a}{\sqrt{4-a^2}}&y'(b)&=\frac{-(b-18)}{\sqrt{64-(b-18)^2}}\end{aligned} y y 1 = m ( x x 1 ) y y 1 = m ( x x 1 ) y 4 a 2 = a ( x a ) 4 a 2 y 64 ( b 18 ) 2 = ( b 18 ) ( x b ) 64 ( b 18 ) 2 \begin{aligned}y-y_1&=m(x-x_1)&y-y_1&=m(x-x_1)\\ y-\sqrt{4-a^2}&=\frac{-a(x-a)}{\sqrt{4-a^2}}&y-\sqrt{64-(b-18)^2}&=\frac{-(b-18)(x-b)}{\sqrt{64-(b-18)^2}}\end{aligned} Now in each of these equations of the tangents, we let y=0 to find where they meet the x axis: 4 a 2 = a ( x a ) 4 a 2 64 ( b 18 ) 2 = ( b 18 ) ( x b ) 64 ( b 18 ) 2 4 a 2 = a ( x a ) 64 ( b 18 ) 2 = ( b 18 ) ( x b ) 4 a 2 = a x a 2 64 b 2 + 36 b 1 8 2 = b x 18 x b 2 + 18 b a x = 4 18 b b x = 1 8 2 18 x 64 a = 4 x b ( 18 x ) = 18 ( 18 x ) 64 b = 18 64 18 x \begin{aligned}-\sqrt{4-a^2}&=\frac{-a(x-a)}{\sqrt{4-a^2}}&-\sqrt{64-(b-18)^2}&=\frac{-(b-18)(x-b)}{\sqrt{64-(b-18)^2}}\\ 4-a^2&=a(x-a)&64-(b-18)^2&=(b-18)(x-b)\\ 4-a^2&=ax-a^2&64-b^2+36b-18^2&=bx-18x-b^2+18b\\ ax&=4&18b-bx&=18^2-18x-64\\ a&=\frac{4}{x}&b(18-x)&=18(18-x)-64\\ &&b&=18-\frac{64}{18-x}\end{aligned} Now, using these formulas, we can determine the location of a and b for any value on the x axis. To explain fully: we will let x be the position of the light source. The source lights a circular dome on each sphere, but the light only reaches as far as the points whose tangents meet the light source. Since we know where these points are (a and b), we can determine a formula for the total area lit up.

The formula for the area of a dome is 2 π r h 2\pi rh where r is the radius of the sphere and h is the height of the dome. The height of the dome on the radius 2 sphere is the distance between a and the edge of the sphere, i.e. h = 2 a h=2-a . The same goes for b, where the edge of the sphere is at 18-8=10: h = b 10 h=b-10 . Now we can put all of this into a single formula for the total surface area lit up on both spheres: A = 2 π ( 2 ) ( 2 a ) + 2 π ( 8 ) ( b 10 ) = 4 π ( 2 4 x ) + 2 π ( 8 ) ( 18 64 18 x 10 ) = 8 π ( 17 2 x 128 18 x ) \begin{aligned}A&=2\pi(2)(2-a)+2\pi(8)(b-10)\\ &=4\pi\left(2-\frac{4}{x}\right)+2\pi(8)\left(18-\frac{64}{18-x}-10\right)\\ &=8\pi\left(17-\frac{2}{x}-\frac{128}{18-x}\right)\end{aligned} Then we simply derive this to find a maximum turning point. d A d x = 8 π ( 2 x 2 128 ( 18 x ) 2 ) let d A d x = 0 8 π ( 2 x 2 128 ( 18 x ) 2 ) = 0 ( 18 x ) 2 = 64 x 2 7 x 2 + 4 x 36 = 0 x = 2 ( where x > 0 ) \frac{dA}{dx}=8\pi\left(\frac{2}{x^2}-\frac{128}{(18-x)^2}\right)\\ \text{let }\frac{dA}{dx}=0\\ 8\pi\left(\frac{2}{x^2}-\frac{128}{(18-x)^2}\right)=0\\ (18-x)^2=64x^2\\ 7x^2+4x-36=0\\ \qquad\qquad x=2\qquad(\text{where }x>0) Next we would prove that this is a maximum turning point, but this should be elementary for those who know maxima and minima. It's a maximum. It also turns out that this point is actually on the edge of the small sphere, so interestingly we only get the maximum area illuminated if the small sphere is not illuminated at all.

Now we plug this value of x into the formula for the combined area to get the final answer. A = 8 π ( 17 2 2 128 18 2 ) = 64 π \begin{aligned}A&=8\pi\left(17-\frac{2}{2}-\frac{128}{18-2}\right)\\ &=64\pi\end{aligned} So the answer is 64 \boxed{64}

I have been surprised that the surface area of a dome is simply 2 π r h 2\pi rh , I'd also calculated it but I thought it was wrong! Good solution! Like it.

Kelvin Hong - 3 years, 2 months ago

Further the light from big sphere, more is the area covered. The furthest it can go is when it touches the smaller sphere. It does not matter if small sphere gets no light since what it losses is more than compensated by gain by bigger sphere.
So light source is 18-2=16 from the center of big sphere..
The tangent to the big makes an angle of ArcSin(8/16)=30 degrees with line joining centers. So radius at the point of tangency makes an angle
of 90-30=60 degrees with line joining centers. The area covered is the cap area = 2 π R 2 ( 1 C o s 60 ) = 64 π = a π . S o a = 64. =2 \pi R^2(1-Cos60)=64\pi=a\pi. \\ So~ a=\color{#D61F06}{64}.


Niranjan Khanderia - 3 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

That is not true. This question is a special case where the smaller sphere doesn't have to be illuminated.

You can try it with spheres of radii 1 and 2 separated by a distance 10. In this case, the smaller sphere will have to be illuminated to illuminate the largest surface area.

Digvijay Singh - 3 years, 2 months ago

Oh, newton knows it all!

Mr. India - 3 years, 2 months ago

This is a classic case of how a good diagram helps. The diagram in the question is not to scale and so hides the fact that the big sphere dominates the problem. The small sphere is in fact at the greatest distance it can be and not have the optimum light source position away from its surface.

Ed Sirett - 3 years, 2 months ago
David Vreken
Mar 20, 2018

A light source near a sphere will illuminate a spherical cap , whose surface area is S = 2 π r h S = 2\pi rh . Below is a diagram of a cross-section of a sphere being illuminated by a light source at L L that is x x away from the surface of the sphere. Let r r be the radius of the sphere, O O be the center of the sphere, C C be the point of tangency of the sphere, B B be the intersection of the O L OL and the sphere, and A A be the perpendicular dropped from C C to O L OL , which makes A B AB the height h h of the cap.

By Pythagorean's Theorem on O C L \triangle OCL we have C L = O L 2 O C 2 CL = \sqrt{OL^2 - OC^2} or C L = ( x + r ) 2 r 2 CL = \sqrt{(x + r)^2 - r^2} or C L = x ( x + 2 r ) CL = \sqrt{x(x + 2r)} .

O C L L A C \triangle OCL ~ \triangle LAC by angle-angle similarity, so A L C L = C L O L \frac{AL}{CL} = \frac{CL}{OL} , or x + h x ( x + 2 r ) = x ( x + 2 r ) x + r \frac{x + h}{\sqrt{x(x + 2r)}} = \frac{\sqrt{x(x + 2r)}}{x + r} , which simplifies to h = r x x + r h = \frac{rx}{x + r} .

Substituting h h into S = 2 π r h S = 2\pi rh , the surface area of the spherical cap illuminated by the light source is S = 2 π r 2 x x + r S = \frac{2\pi r^2x}{x + r} .

The total surface area illuminated on both spheres, where the light source is x x away from the sphere with radius r = 2 r = 2 , and y y away from the sphere with radius r = 8 r = 8 , would then be T = 2 π 2 2 x x + 2 + 2 π 8 2 y y + 8 T = \frac{2\pi 2^2x}{x + 2} + \frac{2\pi 8^2y}{y + 8} .

Since the distance between the surfaces of the two spheres is 18 2 8 = 8 18 - 2 - 8 = 8 , so x + y = 8 x + y = 8 , or y = 8 x y = 8 - x . Therefore, T = 8 π x x + 2 + 128 π ( x 8 ) x 16 T = \frac{8\pi x}{x + 2} + \frac{128\pi (x - 8)}{x - 16} .

The function T T is always decreasing on the interval 0 x 8 0 \leq x \leq 8 , so its largest value is at x = 0 x = 0 .

Therefore, the largest surface area illuminated by the light source is T = 8 π 0 0 + 2 + 128 π ( 0 8 ) 0 16 = 64 π T = \frac{8\pi 0}{0 + 2} + \frac{128\pi (0 - 8)}{0 - 16} = 64\pi , which means a = 64 a = \boxed{64} .

I found your solution to be the simplest and easiest to follow; however, in the second line beneath the figure you arrive at h=(rx)/(x+2). I believe this equation should instead be h=(rx)/(r+x).

James Jensen - 3 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks! I fixed it.

David Vreken - 3 years, 2 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...