Balancing Act

Algebra Level 1

The above shows how a mobile will be balanced when left to hang. Assume that the fulcrum is at the center of each rod.

What are the relative weights of these shapes?

Circle > Rectangle > Triangle Rectangle > Triangle > Circle Triangle > Rectangle > Circle Rectangle > Circle > Triangle Circle > Triangle > Rectangle Triangle > Circle > Rectangle

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

4 solutions

Chew-Seong Cheong
Apr 16, 2015

The right arm > the left arm:

\LARGE \circ + + + +\triangle + \square + \LARGE \circ > + + + > \square + \triangle + \square + \LARGE \circ \quad \Rightarrow \LARGE \circ > >\square

The bottom of the right arm: > + \triangle > \square + \LARGE \circ

Therefore, > \triangle > \LARGE \circ > >\square

nice answer!!

Prasit Sarapee - 5 years, 7 months ago

The bottom left node has rectangle = rectangle + circle. This is only true if circle is weightless.

Mark Lewis - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

No it is + \square + \LARGE \circ > > \square

Chew-Seong Cheong - 5 years, 5 months ago

You really enjoyed these problems. Thanks for writing solutions for them!

Chung Kevin - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

The only issue with this variation of the problem is that there is an unfair imbalance of moments. I.e, the two rods containing rectangle and circle are not perpendicularly equidistant from the highest pivot. But I'm just being picky

Jihoon Kang - 6 years, 1 month ago

amznggg solution ....i really enjoyed this problem

Saiful Saif - 5 years, 7 months ago

Considering that the fulcrum is where the rod is movable. Don't you think that the weights above would influence the movement of the weights below? How can you be certain which is heavier? What if gravity is pulling it upwards?

Zhi Wei - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

This is an algebraic problem not really a classical mechanics. The balance is used to indicate heavier or lighter only.

Chew-Seong Cheong - 5 years, 5 months ago
David Wu
Jan 3, 2016

Bottom right arms:

.: Square + Circle <Triangle

Then, it's a process of elimination - like crossing off equivalent things on each side of an equation:

.: Circle > Square

Let me know if my reasoning is sound.

No it is not because you can't cancel objects of two different layers

Samannay Das - 4 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Why can't you?

David Wu - 3 years, 10 months ago
Drake Pitts
Dec 23, 2015

The root Rod node with right side heavier tells us T r i a n g l e + 2 S q u a r e + C i r c l e < T r i a n g l e + S q u a r e + 2 C i r c l e . Triangle + 2*Square + Circle < Triangle + Square + 2*Circle.

Equivalently, C i r c l e > S q u a r e . Circle > Square.

Furthermore, we know from the Rod node under the Circle and hanging to the right that S q u a r e + C i r c l e < T r i a n g l e . Square + Circle < Triangle. From this we can infer both that T r i a n g l e > C i r c l e Triangle > Circle and T r i a n g l e > S q u a r e . Triangle > Square.

Hence T r i a n g l e > C i r c l e > S q u a r e . Triangle > Circle > Square.

Gary Aknin
Nov 2, 2015

Notice on the lower right branch, the triangle is heavier than the square + circle. If we were to remove a circle, triangle and a rectangle from both side branches, the equilibrium would not change but the remaining circle would be heavier than the remaining rectangle. Therefore, triangle > circle > rectangle.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...