Consider the implicit modified Euler numerical integration technique. The difference between this and its explicit counterpart is that the "dot" and "double-dot" terms have the "k" subscript instead of the "k-1" subscript.
Suppose we use this to discretely approximate the following continuous-time signal:
In the above equation, is a complex number. Define "stability" as the following being true for all processing steps:
For , how much area in the complex plane is NOT included in the stability region?
Note:
Even if the numerical results are "stable" (non-divergent), that doesn't necessarily mean that they are correct
Bonus:
What do you notice about the stability properties of the implicit method, relative to the explicit method?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
No explanations have been posted yet. Check back later!