Define the sequence recursively by , , and
for . Do there exist indices such that ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I claim that a n ≡ 2 ( m o d 3 ) ∀ n ∈ N .
We proceed by induction.
This is true for n = 1 , 2 . Now, let it hold for for some n = k , k − 1 . Then
a k + 1 = ( 2 − k 2 ) a k + ( 2 + k 2 ) a k − 1 ≡ ( 2 − 0 ) ( 2 ) + ( 2 + 0 ) ( 2 ) or ( 2 − 1 ) ( 2 ) + ( 2 + 1 ) ( 2 ) = 8 ≡ 2 ( m o d 3 )
where the 'or' condition arises depending on whether k 2 ≡ 0 or 1 ( m o d 3 ) , but in both the cases, we get that a k + 1 ≡ 2 ( m o d 3 ) completing the induction.
Now, a p a q ≡ ( 2 ) ( 2 ) ≡ 1 ( m o d 3 ) whereas a r ≡ 2 ( m o d 3 ) , and hence this equality can not hold. Hence, the answer is N o .