Indices in recursion

Define the sequence a n n \langle a_{n} \rangle_{n} recursively by a 1 = 2 a_{1}=2 , a 2 = 5 a_{2}=5 , and

a n + 1 = ( 2 n 2 ) a n + ( 2 + n 2 ) a n 1 a_{n+1}=(2-n^{2})a_{n}+(2+n^{2})a_{n-1}

for n 2 n \geq 2 . Do there exist indices p , q , r p,q,r such that a p a q = a r a_{p}a_{q}=a_{r} ?

No Yes

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Aditya Khurmi
Nov 2, 2017

I claim that a n 2 ( m o d 3 ) a_{n} \equiv 2 \pmod {3} n N \forall n \in N .

We proceed by induction.

This is true for n = 1 , 2 n=1,2 . Now, let it hold for for some n = k , k 1 n=k,k-1 . Then

a k + 1 = ( 2 k 2 ) a k + ( 2 + k 2 ) a k 1 ( 2 0 ) ( 2 ) + ( 2 + 0 ) ( 2 ) a_{k+1}=(2-k^{2})a_{k}+(2+k^{2})a_{k-1} \equiv (2-0)(2)+(2+0)(2) or ( 2 1 ) ( 2 ) + ( 2 + 1 ) ( 2 ) = 8 2 ( m o d 3 ) (2-1)(2)+(2+1)(2) =8 \equiv 2 \pmod {3}

where the 'or' condition arises depending on whether k 2 0 k^{2} \equiv 0 or 1 ( m o d 3 ) 1 \pmod{3} , but in both the cases, we get that a k + 1 2 ( m o d 3 ) a_{k+1} \equiv 2 \pmod {3} completing the induction.

Now, a p a q ( 2 ) ( 2 ) 1 ( m o d 3 ) a_{p}a_{q} \equiv (2)(2) \equiv 1 \pmod {3} whereas a r 2 ( m o d 3 ) a_{r} \equiv 2 \pmod {3} , and hence this equality can not hold. Hence, the answer is N o \boxed{No} .

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...