For x > 1 , define f ( x ) = n = 2 ∏ ∞ ( 1 − n x 1 ) .
Find the value of f 2 ( 3 ) f ( 6 ) .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Great problem, Ariel. Can you help me to understand the partial products section? I'm not totally understanding how you went from the one telescoping product to two. Thank you so much.
Log in to reply
Thanks!
Ok well, when you have a finite product, you can rearrange the terms however you like and still have the same answer. Consequently, we get the following identity about finite products: n = 2 ∏ m f ( n ) g ( n ) = n = 2 ∏ m f ( n ) ∗ n = 2 ∏ m g ( n ) (for any functions f and g ). In this case, f ( n ) = n − 1 n + 1 and g ( n ) = n 2 + n + 1 n 2 − n + 1 .
When I split up the product, I skipped a step - in the second product, I rewrote n 2 − n + 1 as ( n − 1 ) 2 + ( n − 1 ) + 1 . This is to demonstrate that the second product is also a telescoping product.
Does that help? :)
I interpreted the question, that the denominator was a cyclic function of order 2 and therefore was unable to solve it. I was suggest changing the location of the squared symbol to make it unambiguous.... see... https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1861580/notation-of-the-square-or-other-power-of-a-function-fx
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
After simplifying a little, we get the following: f 2 ( 3 ) f ( 6 ) = ∏ n = 2 ∞ n 6 ( n 3 − 1 ) 2 ∏ n = 2 ∞ n 6 n 6 − 1 = n = 2 ∏ ∞ ( n 3 − 1 ) 2 n 6 − 1 = n = 2 ∏ ∞ n 3 − 1 n 3 + 1 = n = 2 ∏ ∞ ( n − 1 ) ( n 2 + n + 1 ) ( n + 1 ) ( n 2 − n + 1 ) Now let's use partial products to help us figure this out. Let P m represent the m t h partial product for m ≥ 2 : P m = n = 2 ∏ m ( n − 1 ) ( n 2 + n + 1 ) ( n + 1 ) ( n 2 − n + 1 ) = n = 2 ∏ m n − 1 n + 1 n = 2 ∏ m n 2 + n + 1 ( n − 1 ) 2 + ( n − 1 ) + 1 So now we have two telescoping products. It can be shown by induction that the first product is equal to 2 m ( m + 1 ) , and the second is equal to m 2 + m + 1 3 . Therefore, P m = 2 m ( m + 1 ) m 2 + m + 1 3 = 2 3 ( 1 − m 2 + m + 1 1 ) Therefore, as m approaches infinity, this product approaches 2 3