Evaluate
S = 3 ⋅ e 3 2 + 5 ⋅ e 5 4 + 7 ⋅ e 7 6 + 9 ⋅ e 9 8 + ⋯
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
did the exact same save that I came to the fact that ∑ n = 1 ∞ 2 n + 1 x 2 n + 1 = 2 1 ln ( 1 − x 1 + x ) − x in a different manner. I did it like this -
∑ n = 1 ∞ n x n = − ln ( 1 − x ) after integrating this - ∑ n = 0 ∞ x n = 1 − x 1
Also, ∑ n = 0 ∞ x 2 n + 1 − ∑ n = 1 ∞ x 2 n = ln ( 1 + x )
Adding both these and then some bashing.
Log in to reply
Of course yours is better! And yes nice question!
This is how I originally thought, while making the question that is..
Log in to reply
Hmm but Ronak's way is better, I think. What say?
You might like to use \displaystyle before \sum.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
We have S = n = 1 ∑ ∞ 2 n + 1 2 n e − ( 2 n + 1 )
Rewriting it we have :
S = n = 1 ∑ ∞ e − ( 2 n + 1 ) − n = 1 ∑ ∞ 2 n + 1 e − ( 2 n + 1 ) = S 1 − S 2
S 1 is a infinite G.P. which can be found easily and it comes out to be :
S 1 = e ( e 2 − 1 ) 1
We know that :
n = 1 ∑ ∞ x 2 n = 1 − x 2 x 2
Integrating both sides we get :
n = 1 ∑ ∞ 2 n + 1 x 2 n + 1 = 2 1 l n ( 1 − x 1 + x ) − x + C
Put x = 0 to get C = 0 hence :
n = 1 ∑ ∞ 2 n + 1 x 2 n + 1 = 2 1 l n ( 1 − x 1 + x ) − x
Put x = e 1 to get S 2 as :
S 2 = n = 1 ∑ ∞ 2 n + 1 x 2 n + 1 = 2 1 l n ( e − 1 e + 1 ) − e 1
Finally we get :
S = e ( e 2 − 1 ) 1 − ( 2 1 l n ( e − 1 e + 1 ) − e 1 )
Simplifying this we get :
S = ( e 2 − 1 ) e − 2 1 l n ( e − 1 e + 1 )